- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:06 am to Bottom9
Five years of eligibility?
Fine. Five years to play five .
No redshirts, no injury/illness exceptions, nothing.
Clock starts when you enroll.
Fine. Five years to play five .
No redshirts, no injury/illness exceptions, nothing.
Clock starts when you enroll.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:19 am to Bottom9
Kiffin was “joking” about Dart filing an appeal or something for another year after last night’s game. Seems he knew about this
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:23 am to StansberryRules
quote:
College football gonna become the XFL
we are already there
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:55 am to ragincajun03
quote:
But hell...who has time to "play school" these days and go to class? Is the percent towards your degree each year still even a requirement?
Most aren't student athletes these days, they are just mercenaries
Posted on 1/3/25 at 11:17 am to Bottom9
I have advocated for years the abolition of the redshirt, and just give everyone 5 years to play 5.
Of course this was before the transfer portal.
I haven't seen this proposal or if it also gets rid of the redshirt.
Of course this was before the transfer portal.
I haven't seen this proposal or if it also gets rid of the redshirt.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 12:38 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
I haven't seen this proposal or if it also gets rid of the redshirt.
Yeah I hope at worst it is 5 to play 5 and not 5 to play 8 or 9. I am tired of these old fricks who should be getting CDLs or working at Amazon being 26 playing college ball against 18 and 19 year olds
Posted on 1/3/25 at 12:54 pm to Bottom9
This is going to push NCAAF to a super league.
JuCo years don't count anymore . Now you could get five years.
This is going to make it where super league (B1G/SEC) becomes the "majors", grabbing the best talent via transfer instead of high school players.
Elite HS players can still go to the super league but rosters will just be Elite HS plus portal players - Thus making the non-elite HS prospects go to mid-majors, then be taken by the super league schools later on - which creates the cycle.
I've rolled my eyes at a lot of the "spirit of the sport is gone" posts - but this would put a nail in the coffin to the spirit of the sport. I bitch, but I don't have an answer.
JuCo years don't count anymore . Now you could get five years.
This is going to make it where super league (B1G/SEC) becomes the "majors", grabbing the best talent via transfer instead of high school players.
Elite HS players can still go to the super league but rosters will just be Elite HS plus portal players - Thus making the non-elite HS prospects go to mid-majors, then be taken by the super league schools later on - which creates the cycle.
I've rolled my eyes at a lot of the "spirit of the sport is gone" posts - but this would put a nail in the coffin to the spirit of the sport. I bitch, but I don't have an answer.
This post was edited on 1/3/25 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 1/3/25 at 1:05 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Five years of eligibility?
Fine. Five years to play five .
No redshirts, no injury/illness exceptions, nothing.
Clock starts when you enroll.
I am assuming this is what they are planning. It gets the NCAA out of enforcement and keeps them from having to make "judgment calls" on stuff that they have been losing in court. 5 years to play 5 across the board period.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 1:09 pm to Bottom9
This is bad especially in Olympic sports and non-football where fewer spots exist. There will be ramifications with this into youth and HS sports that a lot of people do not see yet.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 1:18 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Is the percent towards your degree each year still even a requirement?
Yes. Plenty of players that transfer still have to sit if they don’t offer general studies degrees at the school because of this.
If this is the case, then no redshirts and no medical redshirts. Injuries happen. Tough luck. You have 5 years to play and that is it. No hardship waivers, nothing.
Punish the ones trying to actually get an education to placate a bunch of kids that have no business in an academic campus.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 2:41 pm to Bottom9
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/30/25 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 1/3/25 at 2:44 pm to Bottom9
If this gets rid of redshirts, and everyone just has 5 years and that's it. Id be ok with this.
My fear is it won't be the end of it. You will still have another Diego Pavia who sues because he thinks he should be allowed a 6th year.
My fear is it won't be the end of it. You will still have another Diego Pavia who sues because he thinks he should be allowed a 6th year.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 5:00 pm to Bottom9
The only thing I think this helps is Baseball. Gives players 2 maybe 3 leverage years. With NIL players go to school, spend 3 years in college verses rookie ball in the sticks. If TV can really put more games, schools invest more money, the college game would be great.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 5:06 pm to Bottom9
I've said it again and again. It will not be long - 10 years maybe - until the eligibility rules are dropped. Players will be able to play for as long as they want, and eventually won't have to be in school at all. We'll have 37 year old adults playing "college ball".
I get mass downvoted each time, but it's coming.
I get mass downvoted each time, but it's coming.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 5:12 pm to goldennugget
quote:The courts would not rule that the universities are not allowed to be a restriction on number of years of eligibility.
It's a joke but the NCAA would just be sued in court over this and lose.
If they did, that would then extend down to high schools and lower.
Will not happen.
Posted on 1/3/25 at 7:16 pm to RelicBatches86
quote:And a lot of younger college players coming up that would like to get their chance to play. But many of them who don’t have prospective careers at the next level will want to graduate in 4 years and start their real world careers. So now they spend more of their 4 years stuck behind 5th and 6th year guys who weren’t good enough to turn pro, but didn’t play school well enough to have a good career path after their college athlete days are over. So those guys will milk NCAA eligibility for as many years as they can
but there are alot of damn good football players that probably would loved to play an extra year rather then graduate and sell cars
Posted on 1/3/25 at 7:48 pm to GeauxtigersMs36
It helps players. This actually makes sense.
You almost can’t redshirt kids anymore because they will leave and if you are a kid you don’t get stuck deciding to play a 5th game at the end of the year and burning a year.
Just give them 5 total years
Where they will run into issues is injuries and applications for 6th year. Basically any season ender is now a medical redshirt situation
You almost can’t redshirt kids anymore because they will leave and if you are a kid you don’t get stuck deciding to play a 5th game at the end of the year and burning a year.
Just give them 5 total years
Where they will run into issues is injuries and applications for 6th year. Basically any season ender is now a medical redshirt situation
Posted on 1/3/25 at 8:37 pm to Bottom9
Screw it. Give them 10 year contracts at this point.
Popular
Back to top


0








