Started By
Message

re: NCAA considering move to 5 years of Eligibility

Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:00 am to
Posted by AkronTiger
Rubber City
Member since May 2021
2735 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:00 am to
Oh come on
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:06 am to
Five years of eligibility?
Fine. Five years to play five .
No redshirts, no injury/illness exceptions, nothing.
Clock starts when you enroll.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
75888 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:19 am to
Kiffin was “joking” about Dart filing an appeal or something for another year after last night’s game. Seems he knew about this
Posted by PSS101
Member since Jun 2024
1126 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:23 am to
quote:

College football gonna become the XFL


we are already there
Posted by goldennugget
NIL Ruined College Sports
Member since Jul 2013
26239 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 10:55 am to
quote:

But hell...who has time to "play school" these days and go to class? Is the percent towards your degree each year still even a requirement?



Most aren't student athletes these days, they are just mercenaries
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
34118 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 11:17 am to
I have advocated for years the abolition of the redshirt, and just give everyone 5 years to play 5.

Of course this was before the transfer portal.

I haven't seen this proposal or if it also gets rid of the redshirt.
Posted by Bottom9
Arsenal Til I Die
Member since Jul 2010
24616 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

I haven't seen this proposal or if it also gets rid of the redshirt.



Yeah I hope at worst it is 5 to play 5 and not 5 to play 8 or 9. I am tired of these old fricks who should be getting CDLs or working at Amazon being 26 playing college ball against 18 and 19 year olds
Posted by JukeLeft
Member since Feb 2015
994 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 12:54 pm to
This is going to push NCAAF to a super league.

JuCo years don't count anymore . Now you could get five years.

This is going to make it where super league (B1G/SEC) becomes the "majors", grabbing the best talent via transfer instead of high school players.

Elite HS players can still go to the super league but rosters will just be Elite HS plus portal players - Thus making the non-elite HS prospects go to mid-majors, then be taken by the super league schools later on - which creates the cycle.

I've rolled my eyes at a lot of the "spirit of the sport is gone" posts - but this would put a nail in the coffin to the spirit of the sport. I bitch, but I don't have an answer.
This post was edited on 1/3/25 at 12:55 pm
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
9323 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Five years of eligibility?
Fine. Five years to play five .
No redshirts, no injury/illness exceptions, nothing.
Clock starts when you enroll.


I am assuming this is what they are planning. It gets the NCAA out of enforcement and keeps them from having to make "judgment calls" on stuff that they have been losing in court. 5 years to play 5 across the board period.
Posted by rpg37
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Sep 2008
53709 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 1:09 pm to
This is bad especially in Olympic sports and non-football where fewer spots exist. There will be ramifications with this into youth and HS sports that a lot of people do not see yet.
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
13299 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Is the percent towards your degree each year still even a requirement?


Yes. Plenty of players that transfer still have to sit if they don’t offer general studies degrees at the school because of this.

If this is the case, then no redshirts and no medical redshirts. Injuries happen. Tough luck. You have 5 years to play and that is it. No hardship waivers, nothing.

Punish the ones trying to actually get an education to placate a bunch of kids that have no business in an academic campus.
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
4481 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 2:41 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/30/25 at 9:58 pm
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
17229 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 2:44 pm to
If this gets rid of redshirts, and everyone just has 5 years and that's it. Id be ok with this.

My fear is it won't be the end of it. You will still have another Diego Pavia who sues because he thinks he should be allowed a 6th year.
Posted by GeauxtigersMs36
The coast
Member since Jan 2018
12477 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 5:00 pm to
The only thing I think this helps is Baseball. Gives players 2 maybe 3 leverage years. With NIL players go to school, spend 3 years in college verses rookie ball in the sticks. If TV can really put more games, schools invest more money, the college game would be great.
Posted by Thundercles
Mars
Member since Sep 2010
6130 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 5:06 pm to
I've said it again and again. It will not be long - 10 years maybe - until the eligibility rules are dropped. Players will be able to play for as long as they want, and eventually won't have to be in school at all. We'll have 37 year old adults playing "college ball".

I get mass downvoted each time, but it's coming.
Posted by GusAU
Member since Mar 2014
4920 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

It's a joke but the NCAA would just be sued in court over this and lose.
The courts would not rule that the universities are not allowed to be a restriction on number of years of eligibility.

If they did, that would then extend down to high schools and lower.

Will not happen.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25186 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

but there are alot of damn good football players that probably would loved to play an extra year rather then graduate and sell cars
And a lot of younger college players coming up that would like to get their chance to play. But many of them who don’t have prospective careers at the next level will want to graduate in 4 years and start their real world careers. So now they spend more of their 4 years stuck behind 5th and 6th year guys who weren’t good enough to turn pro, but didn’t play school well enough to have a good career path after their college athlete days are over. So those guys will milk NCAA eligibility for as many years as they can
Posted by upstate
Member since Nov 2015
709 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 7:48 pm to
It helps players. This actually makes sense.
You almost can’t redshirt kids anymore because they will leave and if you are a kid you don’t get stuck deciding to play a 5th game at the end of the year and burning a year.
Just give them 5 total years

Where they will run into issues is injuries and applications for 6th year. Basically any season ender is now a medical redshirt situation
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
66579 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 8:35 pm to
Pointless and stupid
Posted by BeachDude022
Premium Elite Platinum TD Member
Member since Dec 2006
36406 posts
Posted on 1/3/25 at 8:37 pm to
Screw it. Give them 10 year contracts at this point.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram