- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NBA cba negotations: Owners asked for $45 million hard cap
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:05 am to supatigah
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:05 am to supatigah
quote:
If they dont get the financial agreement rewritten then a snowball effect could sweep the problems to more than just the bottom 5
the revenue/cost problem? no way. that is consistent
now the franchise valuation issue? i'll buy that. these teams aren't worth what the owners believe they are.
this whole problem is the fricking owners. i just think it's bullshite at its core. i also do not believe owners are truly behind this "one size fits all" cap. the knicks and lakers WILL spend more than the bucks. it's too important to the NBA not to have that happen
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:09 am to Bench McElroy
quote:
If the owners want to stop losing money, they should stop overpaying for inferior players.
i've been breaching that for years, brotha
this whole "problem" is solely on the owners
quote:
It's as simple as that. It's not like there's like a Yankees-like team in the NBA that inflated players salaries with a 200 million dollar payroll.
anymore. the knicks (and to a lesser extent, the mavs) used to perform these roles
quote:
There's no excuse for the owners who keep offering horrible contracts year in and year out.
agreed
and it's not just the contracts...it's the length. basically when the new cba (and max annual salaries and the MLE), teams started basically paying more per actual year of value by simply giving 1-2 extra years at the end
i try to point this out when people say shite like "kobe will be making $30M in a few years." yea, he'll be making that b/c if there were a truly free market, he'd be making more RIGHT NOW than the annual cap allows. that $30M is a deferred makeup payment
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:12 am to Bench McElroy
quote:I'm not well-versed enough in business to get why this doesn't make perfect sense.
If the owners want to stop losing money, they should stop overpaying for inferior players. It's as simple as that. It's not like there's like a Yankees-like team in the NBA that inflated players salaries with a 200 million dollar payroll. There's no excuse for the owners who keep offering horrible contracts year in and year out.
If Joe Blow offers his services, and he asks for $100 million a year for them, and I think that's too much, I probably should not agree to give him that much. I don't understand why the owners need a rule to solve this.
Latrell Sprewell is out of the NBA because nobody ponied up to his asking price. Barry Bonds is out of baseball because, among other reasons, nobody ponied up to his asking price. The NBA should be treating many, many more players this way.
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:14 am to SlowFlowPro
The fixed hard cap prevents owners from overspending
This worked in hockey and it will work in basketball
This worked in hockey and it will work in basketball
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:16 am to supatigah
quote:
The fixed hard cap prevents owners from overspending
but it will kill the league
if big market teams aren't awesome, the league as a whole suffers
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:16 am to xiv
quote:
Latrell Sprewell is out of the NBA because nobody ponied up to his asking price. Barry Bonds is out of baseball because, among other reasons, nobody ponied up to his asking price. The NBA should be treating many, many more players this way.
pretty much
this is the owners trying to control themselves
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:19 am to SlowFlowPro
FAs will still want to play in major markets because of ancillary income opportunities
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:25 am to supatigah
quote:
FAs will still want to play in major markets because of ancillary income opportunities
hard cap makes movement much more difficult. and i mean MUCH more difficult
think about how the lakers and boston were built. this wouldn't be an option with a hard cap
OKC has even done this on a lesser level (perkins)
think about the players the lakers will have to shed, even with voided contracts. OKC will be split up. the heat will be split up. boston will be split up (this was coming anyway). this is horrible for teh league
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
What makes you think these teams will be split up? A hard cap makes it tougher to sign FAs and shorter deals make the players motivated to play harder in the regular season making for a better overall product
Look at Chicago, that is a team under the current rules that has zero chance Of staying together long term. Under a hard cap they could keep that team together because there isn't some dumbass owner out there that could break the bank for someone like Noah
Look at Chicago, that is a team under the current rules that has zero chance Of staying together long term. Under a hard cap they could keep that team together because there isn't some dumbass owner out there that could break the bank for someone like Noah
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:44 am to supatigah
quote:
What makes you think these teams will be split up?
teams aren't going to be able to stack a team with talent. the durants and westbrooks of the NBA will get paid
quote:
A hard cap makes it tougher to sign FAs and shorter deals make the players motivated to play harder in the regular season making for a better overall product
a harder cap only drives down player salaries and restricts player movement. it is a vehicle for parity
parity and the NBA do not really mesh
quote:
Look at Chicago, that is a team under the current rules that has zero chance Of staying together long term
why?
they're currently 26 with only $55M tied up
D Rose is signed through 12/13, but let's bump his salary by $10M....$65M. nothing bad for a big market team
$7M more for noah's bump and they're in the low 70s. completely doable. they wouldn't even be in the top-5 salaries currently with that payroll
the bulls spent more than everyone else in the jordan era and did fine. i don't see why they can't now
quote:
Under a hard cap they could keep that team together because there isn't some dumbass owner out there that could break the bank for someone like Noah
they won't be able to afford noah, boozer, deng, and rose with a $45M payroll. not if they want anybody else not playing for a sub $500k salary
stars will still be paid. no matter what you set the cap at, some team will sign a star or 2 for a big amount and just be the current version of the knicks
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if big market teams aren't awesome, the league as a whole suffers
Wrong. Imagine trying to be a bobcats fan n having to look at ur roster compared to the lakers. It kills interest
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:50 am to sgallo3
quote:
Wrong.
the finals with the lakers and celtics last year led to a huge spike in ratings (and i mean huge)
i wonder why
go look at the finals ratings of detroit-san antonio
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:55 am to supatigah
I just dont see how this is going to get done. They cant just change up written, signed contracts so that they dont get as much money. What court would allow that?
I think we just need to have the first ever real life fantasy auction draft. Teams have $50million hard cap. Every player is available as a free agent. Boom! Let the bidding wars begin
I think we just need to have the first ever real life fantasy auction draft. Teams have $50million hard cap. Every player is available as a free agent. Boom! Let the bidding wars begin
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the finals with the lakers and celtics last year led to a huge spike in ratings (and i mean huge)
i wonder why
go look at the finals ratings of detroit-san antonio
Finals ratings Might not be as high, but there would be more asses in the seats on a nightly basis and higher tv ratings throughout the season. That would generate more revenue. A highly rated finals really doesnt mean anything til the next tv contract negotiations
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:03 am to sgallo3
quote:
Might not be as high, but there would be more asses in the seats on a nightly basis and higher tv ratings throughout the season
debatable. Some markets even when they have legit playoff teams still can't put asses in the seats, See New Orleans.
Hornets had to be a top 4 team in the league to have decent capacity consistently in the regular season.
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:05 am to sgallo3
quote:
Finals ratings Might not be as high, but there would be more asses in the seats on a nightly basis and higher tv ratings throughout the season.
the league had a big uptick in ratings this year
basically fans are coming back generally + the knicks, bulls, and heat getting star power pushed the national interest up
the main revenue stream of the NBA and NFL is the national tv deals they agree to. the MLB lets each team basically do their thing (which is why the big market teams can spend so much, esp with individual teams creating networks)
remember, the main NBA tv deal is through cable. it's a national sport and requires a national audience
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:11 am to jacks40
quote:
debatable. Some markets even when they have legit playoff teams still can't put asses in the seats, See New Orleans.
Hornets had to be a top 4 team in the league to have decent capacity consistently in the regular season.
This is caused by the absurd ticket prices which is a result of huge salaries.
Its the owners responsibility to set ticket prices at the currect numbers to maximize profit, and they refuse to lower prices to reflect the market for them in this economy
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:23 am to sgallo3
Look for a nice expansion to the Euro-league rosters after this year.
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:28 am to sgallo3
quote:
This is caused by the absurd ticket prices which is a result of huge salaries.
not true or at least not the only reason why some small markets can't put people in seats despite being playoff teams.
You can buy $7 tickets for any non Laker/Heat/Celtics game in the New Orleans Arena.
I've found lower bowl tickets to Hornets games for $80 a pair on stubhub.
In general small market NBA teams have decent prices
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:33 am to sgallo3
quote:
This is caused by the absurd ticket prices which is a result of huge salaries.
no
the absurd ticket prices are a result of corporate sponsorship of teams. big companies buy the tickets in bulk, as well as the suites
due to this, the ticket prices rise for everyone else (and the need for individual fan interest at games is decreased)
that's the major reason why big markets can pay more for players. big markets = more big companies = more revenue
Popular
Back to top



0





