Started By
Message

re: NBA cba negotations: Owners asked for $45 million hard cap

Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:05 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:05 am to
quote:

If they dont get the financial agreement rewritten then a snowball effect could sweep the problems to more than just the bottom 5

the revenue/cost problem? no way. that is consistent

now the franchise valuation issue? i'll buy that. these teams aren't worth what the owners believe they are.

this whole problem is the fricking owners. i just think it's bullshite at its core. i also do not believe owners are truly behind this "one size fits all" cap. the knicks and lakers WILL spend more than the bucks. it's too important to the NBA not to have that happen
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:09 am to
quote:

If the owners want to stop losing money, they should stop overpaying for inferior players.

i've been breaching that for years, brotha

this whole "problem" is solely on the owners

quote:

It's as simple as that. It's not like there's like a Yankees-like team in the NBA that inflated players salaries with a 200 million dollar payroll.

anymore. the knicks (and to a lesser extent, the mavs) used to perform these roles

quote:

There's no excuse for the owners who keep offering horrible contracts year in and year out.

agreed

and it's not just the contracts...it's the length. basically when the new cba (and max annual salaries and the MLE), teams started basically paying more per actual year of value by simply giving 1-2 extra years at the end

i try to point this out when people say shite like "kobe will be making $30M in a few years." yea, he'll be making that b/c if there were a truly free market, he'd be making more RIGHT NOW than the annual cap allows. that $30M is a deferred makeup payment
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:12 am to
quote:

If the owners want to stop losing money, they should stop overpaying for inferior players. It's as simple as that. It's not like there's like a Yankees-like team in the NBA that inflated players salaries with a 200 million dollar payroll. There's no excuse for the owners who keep offering horrible contracts year in and year out.

I'm not well-versed enough in business to get why this doesn't make perfect sense.

If Joe Blow offers his services, and he asks for $100 million a year for them, and I think that's too much, I probably should not agree to give him that much. I don't understand why the owners need a rule to solve this.

Latrell Sprewell is out of the NBA because nobody ponied up to his asking price. Barry Bonds is out of baseball because, among other reasons, nobody ponied up to his asking price. The NBA should be treating many, many more players this way.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90054 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:14 am to
The fixed hard cap prevents owners from overspending

This worked in hockey and it will work in basketball
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:16 am to
quote:

The fixed hard cap prevents owners from overspending

but it will kill the league

if big market teams aren't awesome, the league as a whole suffers
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Latrell Sprewell is out of the NBA because nobody ponied up to his asking price. Barry Bonds is out of baseball because, among other reasons, nobody ponied up to his asking price. The NBA should be treating many, many more players this way.

pretty much

this is the owners trying to control themselves
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90054 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:19 am to
FAs will still want to play in major markets because of ancillary income opportunities

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:25 am to
quote:

FAs will still want to play in major markets because of ancillary income opportunities

hard cap makes movement much more difficult. and i mean MUCH more difficult

think about how the lakers and boston were built. this wouldn't be an option with a hard cap

OKC has even done this on a lesser level (perkins)

think about the players the lakers will have to shed, even with voided contracts. OKC will be split up. the heat will be split up. boston will be split up (this was coming anyway). this is horrible for teh league
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
90054 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:32 am to
What makes you think these teams will be split up? A hard cap makes it tougher to sign FAs and shorter deals make the players motivated to play harder in the regular season making for a better overall product

Look at Chicago, that is a team under the current rules that has zero chance Of staying together long term. Under a hard cap they could keep that team together because there isn't some dumbass owner out there that could break the bank for someone like Noah

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:44 am to
quote:

What makes you think these teams will be split up?

teams aren't going to be able to stack a team with talent. the durants and westbrooks of the NBA will get paid

quote:

A hard cap makes it tougher to sign FAs and shorter deals make the players motivated to play harder in the regular season making for a better overall product

a harder cap only drives down player salaries and restricts player movement. it is a vehicle for parity

parity and the NBA do not really mesh

quote:

Look at Chicago, that is a team under the current rules that has zero chance Of staying together long term

why?

they're currently 26 with only $55M tied up

D Rose is signed through 12/13, but let's bump his salary by $10M....$65M. nothing bad for a big market team

$7M more for noah's bump and they're in the low 70s. completely doable. they wouldn't even be in the top-5 salaries currently with that payroll

the bulls spent more than everyone else in the jordan era and did fine. i don't see why they can't now

quote:

Under a hard cap they could keep that team together because there isn't some dumbass owner out there that could break the bank for someone like Noah

they won't be able to afford noah, boozer, deng, and rose with a $45M payroll. not if they want anybody else not playing for a sub $500k salary

stars will still be paid. no matter what you set the cap at, some team will sign a star or 2 for a big amount and just be the current version of the knicks
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27098 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:48 am to
quote:

if big market teams aren't awesome, the league as a whole suffers


Wrong. Imagine trying to be a bobcats fan n having to look at ur roster compared to the lakers. It kills interest
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Wrong.

the finals with the lakers and celtics last year led to a huge spike in ratings (and i mean huge)

i wonder why

go look at the finals ratings of detroit-san antonio
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27098 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:55 am to
I just dont see how this is going to get done. They cant just change up written, signed contracts so that they dont get as much money. What court would allow that?

I think we just need to have the first ever real life fantasy auction draft. Teams have $50million hard cap. Every player is available as a free agent. Boom! Let the bidding wars begin
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27098 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 8:57 am to
quote:

the finals with the lakers and celtics last year led to a huge spike in ratings (and i mean huge)

i wonder why

go look at the finals ratings of detroit-san antonio


Finals ratings Might not be as high, but there would be more asses in the seats on a nightly basis and higher tv ratings throughout the season. That would generate more revenue. A highly rated finals really doesnt mean anything til the next tv contract negotiations
Posted by jacks40
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
11877 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Might not be as high, but there would be more asses in the seats on a nightly basis and higher tv ratings throughout the season


debatable. Some markets even when they have legit playoff teams still can't put asses in the seats, See New Orleans.

Hornets had to be a top 4 team in the league to have decent capacity consistently in the regular season.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Finals ratings Might not be as high, but there would be more asses in the seats on a nightly basis and higher tv ratings throughout the season.

the league had a big uptick in ratings this year

basically fans are coming back generally + the knicks, bulls, and heat getting star power pushed the national interest up

the main revenue stream of the NBA and NFL is the national tv deals they agree to. the MLB lets each team basically do their thing (which is why the big market teams can spend so much, esp with individual teams creating networks)

remember, the main NBA tv deal is through cable. it's a national sport and requires a national audience
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27098 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:11 am to
quote:

debatable. Some markets even when they have legit playoff teams still can't put asses in the seats, See New Orleans.

Hornets had to be a top 4 team in the league to have decent capacity consistently in the regular season.


This is caused by the absurd ticket prices which is a result of huge salaries.

Its the owners responsibility to set ticket prices at the currect numbers to maximize profit, and they refuse to lower prices to reflect the market for them in this economy
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60917 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:23 am to
Look for a nice expansion to the Euro-league rosters after this year.
Posted by jacks40
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
11877 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:28 am to
quote:

This is caused by the absurd ticket prices which is a result of huge salaries.



not true or at least not the only reason why some small markets can't put people in seats despite being playoff teams.

You can buy $7 tickets for any non Laker/Heat/Celtics game in the New Orleans Arena.

I've found lower bowl tickets to Hornets games for $80 a pair on stubhub.

In general small market NBA teams have decent prices
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476599 posts
Posted on 5/17/11 at 9:33 am to
quote:

This is caused by the absurd ticket prices which is a result of huge salaries.

no

the absurd ticket prices are a result of corporate sponsorship of teams. big companies buy the tickets in bulk, as well as the suites

due to this, the ticket prices rise for everyone else (and the need for individual fan interest at games is decreased)

that's the major reason why big markets can pay more for players. big markets = more big companies = more revenue
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram