Started By
Message

re: Most over-rated

Posted on 9/11/08 at 7:21 am to
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
37713 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 7:21 am to
quote:

LSU pounded Arizona 59-13 the second game of the season.


And? Whtatever you are grasping for....

Arakansas vs. USC....?
This post was edited on 9/11/08 at 7:31 am
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
37713 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 7:25 am to
quote:

This is what USC fans are simply incapable of grasping. Each and every team assented to the BCS system well before the 2003 season began. They agreed that the BCS and the BCS alone would determine who played in the championship game.


There is where you are wrong and grasping for straws. Not one coach, conference team, etc, agreed that the BCS alone would determine the NC's. The agreement was rather simple.
In sum, this is what was agreed upon:
1- The BCS will use the formula de jour, consisting of XYZ polls, computer rankings etc to determine the top 8 teams in the BCS.
2- The following bowls are designated as BCS Bowls- Rose, Sugar, Orange, Fiesta
3- The winners of the following conferences automatically qualify for a BCS bowl" ACC, SEC, Big East, PAC-10, Big 10.
4- One champion from CUSA, the MAC, MWC, WAC, or Sun Belt qualifies for a BCS game if : they are in the top 12 BCS, or, ranked in the top 16 of BCS and is higher than that of a champion of BCS conference
5. Notre Dame will get special consideration if within the top 8, but no other team not from a conference listed above. After all, they are ND
6. If all BCS bowl game slots are not filled, it will be filled via ______________
7- Teams will go to designated bowls
8.- The top 2 teams in the BCS standings will play each other in a BCS bowl (later moved to the week after a BCS bowl) in what is called the BCS NC game
6. The winner of #1 vs. #2 in the BCS rankings will be voted NC by the coaches' poll, made by prior agreement.

No more no less was agreed to. Nothing about disbanding the AP NC or the BCS being the only NC.
Posted by rbdallas
Dallas, TX
Member since Nov 2007
10344 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 8:09 am to
quote:

I actually think Tressel is a great coach and I'd love to have him at LSU if circumstances were different and we didn't have Miles. He's solid, can just be a bit predictable on offense when he's matched against teams with equal or greater talent.


Absolutely NOT.
He is a great person, but a mediocre coach for national competition.
You are probably young and do not remember Charlie Mac..a lot of similarities between them research it.
He, also, could never win the big one.
Neither of them have enough imagination to win the big one...the style of the game has passed them by.

quote:

predictable on offense when he's matched against teams with equal or greater talent.

that will likely keep him from winning the big one, unless he gets a big mismatch.
Why have a coach that can not win NC games.?
This post was edited on 9/11/08 at 8:12 am
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21575 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 9:06 am to
If I read the title right--it says top 5 overrated coaches. How in the hell does this thread end up in a USC/LSU pissing contest? I guess we've never had a thread on that before.
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
33146 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 9:11 am to
quote:

How in the hell does this thread end up in a USC/LSU pissing contest?

quote:

LSUTANGERINE

Nuff said.
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
33146 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 9:20 am to
quote:

no way in hell meyer is on that list.
My pick of Meyer is relative- it's based on the amount of hype he gets, Saban is the same. It's not to say that they aren't good coaches, but that they are overhyped, that's what I intrepreted the thread to ask, "Over-rated". That only means that your hype does not live up to reality.
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 9:24 am to
1. Charlie Weis
2. Steve Spurrier
3. Mack Brown
4. Phil Fulmer
5. Frank Beamer
Posted by Ric Flair
Charlotte
Member since Oct 2005
13867 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 9:31 am to
quote:

1. Charlie Weis
2. Steve Spurrier
3. Mack Brown
4. Phil Fulmer
5. Frank Beamer


Good list.

For a while this thread was like a time machine back to the rant in 2004. And those that say Carroll is overrated are nuts.
Posted by AlejandroInHouston
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2007
18776 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 9:33 am to
TFan, I think your list is spot on. I agree with every one of your top 5. I'd definitely save a spot for Fat Phil though.
This post was edited on 9/11/08 at 9:34 am
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 10:49 am to
I’ll defend Beamer as a great coach. He friggin’ BUILT the Virginia Tech program. Before he arrived, the mere concept of VT “underachieving” was laughable at best. They were a complete non-factor in the national scene before he arrived, and he managed to turn a nothing independent into the power of the Big East and now the ACC. He even played for a national title. At Virginia Tech. People don’t willingly go to Blacksburg.

My overrated list –
TEDFORD. Never won anything and for a guy who is fabled as a QB guru, all of his QB’s bomb in the NFL. Maybe I just hate him as a residuary of my hatred of Kyle Boller.

WEISS. Though he is quickly falling off the “rated” list so it might be hard to overrate him soon.

GROH. I can’t believe this guy is considered a good coach despite winning next to nothing in his entire career. Just because you once got hired by an NFL team, it does not mean you are suddenly a coaching genius.

SABAN. I’m not a Saban basher, but come on, the guy has had one great season in his coaching career and he is one of the highest paid coaches in football. LSU was madly inconsistent under him. I don’t think he sucks, but how about he stay at a program for more than four years before we crown him as a great coach?

FERENTZ. I was a huge fan of his, but his program has fallen apart. It was an illusion.
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45836 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 10:57 am to
Ferentz certainly deserves to be on the list, but Iowa is surprising me so far this year. They're going to be light years ahead of where they were last year despite the big scandal going on (but I guess that isn't really saying much).
Posted by el tigre
your heart
Member since Sep 2003
49712 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 11:01 am to
quote:

I’ll defend Beamer as a great coach. He friggin’ BUILT the Virginia Tech program. Before he arrived, the mere concept of VT “underachieving” was laughable at best. They were a complete non-factor in the national scene before he arrived, and he managed to turn a nothing independent into the power of the Big East and now the ACC. He even played for a national title. At Virginia Tech. People don’t willingly go to Blacksburg.


look at this post, all of these things are in the past. the fact that he now goes for multiple year periods where it seems that the forward pass is new concept is unacceptable. Also, the stunt with the Taylor redshirt was laughable....one of the worst moves i have seen in years. Add in his WRETCHED game day coaching and he is on my list.

Like Spurrier, years ago Beamer would not be on this list. Right now, he is.
This post was edited on 9/11/08 at 11:02 am
Posted by TigerRagAndrew
Check my style out
Member since Aug 2004
7252 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Pete Carroll should really be in there.


Ever since Reggie, Lendale and Leinart left the team they hasn't been the same since. Losing to Stanford last season and UCLA the year before. Thats Unacceptable with the kind of talent USC has.

Thats Like LSU football losing to Vanderbilt or Miss st. or even worse losing to Tulane.


Vandy, Miss ST. and Tulane are not on the level that UCLA and Stanford are.

JDB and Mark Sanchez are not the quality of quarterback that Leinart was/is. Enuff said.

It's my opinion that USC's talent was probably overrated by the recruiting services.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 11:12 am to
Virginia Tech won the ACC title last year. And while I agree he botched the Taylor thing, I don’t think that means he is suddenly a bad coach. So VT looks like it’s going to have its first bad season in, what, 15 years? VT hasn’t won less than 8 games since 1992 (oops… they won 7 in 1997). He’s won at least ten games the past four seasons, and he’s won at least ten in 7 of the last 9 seasons.

Exactly how is the VT program doing poorly recently?

A lot of guys getting named I’d consider almost underrated because they are getting unreasonably bashed.

Mack Brown has rebuilt Texas into a machine that wins ten games every season like clockwork. The knock on Bob Stoops is that he loses BCS games? Really? He rebuilt OU and if the negative is that he craps out in January 1st bowls, perhaps you’re missing the big picture that he’s always going to them. Jim Tressell has lost two national title games? Do you know how hard it is to get to those games? Mark Richt has “only” won two SEC titles?

If these guys aren’t the elite coaches in the game, who is?
Posted by Kige Ramsey
1996,1998,2012.
Member since Jul 2007
44435 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 11:22 am to
Steve Surppier
Posted by loweralabamatrojan
Lower Alabama
Member since Oct 2006
13238 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

why do you guys make such huge claims about the mid to lower class of the SEC

Auburn and Arkansas are generally pretty good.
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

TEDFORD. Never won anything and for a guy who is fabled as a QB guru, all of his QB’s bomb in the NFL. Maybe I just hate him as a residuary of my hatred of Kyle Boller.

Unless you've lived in the Bay Area you have no idea how little support there is for athletics at Cal. Cal fields teams in 27 NCAA sports with an athletics department budget of around $40 million. (By comparison LSU's athletic department budget is over $63 million for 20 teams.) So if anything, Tedford overachieves by winning with QB's who lack NFL skills. The fact that NFL scouts have mistakenly evaluated QB's who played for Tedford is not Tedford's fault. Sorry about Kyle Boller, but that is more Brian Billick's fault.

Football games are still won by teams that block and tackle. Cal has been able to recruit some outstanding players at skill positions, but Cal has not been able to recruit enough talent on the offensive and defensive lines to be championship contenders. They have been a media darling because of Tedford's offensive game planning, and the skills of his players have allowed them to score lots of points. However, at some point during every season Cal's lack of depth becomes painfully evident when they lose games due to minor injuries to starters or fatigue.

I think Tedford would be frightening at a school where he got full support of the administration, and a decent recruiting base. Just as you assert,
quote:

People don’t willingly go to Blacksburg.
football players don't go willingly to Cal.
Posted by ToplessTenors4evuh
Member since Jan 2005
41259 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

how is he overrated when he has been fired? Is he even coaching anywhere right now?



Im sure he's coaching high school or pop warner somewhere...and wherever he is, he's still overrated.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Ever since Reggie, Lendale and Leinart left the team they hasn't been the same since. Losing to Stanford last season and UCLA the year before. Thats Unacceptable with the kind of talent USC has.

Thats Like LSU football losing to Vanderbilt or Miss st. or even worse losing to Tulane.


You know absolutely ZERO about PAC 10 football.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287985 posts
Posted on 9/11/08 at 3:27 pm to
anyone that says Carroll is a clown. He is easily the best coach in college football.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram