- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More OSU violations to come? Looking possible...
Posted on 5/8/11 at 7:37 pm to PPBeastMode
Posted on 5/8/11 at 7:37 pm to PPBeastMode
Yeah and it is offered to the general public.
ETA:
And since it is offered to the general public, is it a violation tat the dealer allows for certain players not to have that down payment.
Maybe its not...that ruler isn't specific enough for me.
ETA:
And since it is offered to the general public, is it a violation tat the dealer allows for certain players not to have that down payment.
Maybe its not...that ruler isn't specific enough for me.
This post was edited on 5/8/11 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 5/8/11 at 7:39 pm to taylork37
quote:
Yeah and it is offered to the general public
so if he have a bad credit since he doesn't have a job and still got 0 down, you don't think that's an extra benefit??
Posted on 5/8/11 at 7:41 pm to PPBeastMode
Yes, but if it is offered to the general public?
Thats I think where we disagree.
ETA:
We disagree on the meaning of "eligible to the general public"
Thats I think where we disagree.
ETA:
We disagree on the meaning of "eligible to the general public"
This post was edited on 5/8/11 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 5/8/11 at 7:51 pm to PPBeastMode
How can the ncaa prove that they gave it to him because he is a football player. as said that is a blurry line since item up to the dealers discretion.
This post was edited on 5/8/11 at 7:53 pm
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:02 pm to finallyfastohio
quote:
How can the ncaa prove that they gave it to him because he is a football player. as said that is a blurry line since item up to the dealers discretion.
because he have to fill out a paper work in which they will ask for his occupation (full/half time student), don't you think it would be a red flag that a full/half time student would get 0 down?
This post was edited on 5/8/11 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:05 pm to finallyfastohio
quote:
Message
Posted by finallyfastohio
How can the ncaa prove .
Prove? They just have to think it not prove it
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:13 pm to PPBeastMode
quote:
occupation (Football Player)
FIFY
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:17 pm to marchballer
quote:
occupation (Football Player)
FIFY
quote:
How can the ncaa prove that they gave it to him because he is a football player. as said that is a blurry line since item up to the dealers discretion.
I was trying to set him up
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:19 pm to jacks40
It's the dealerships decision don't think the ncaa will can do anything about that. I could go in there tom and they could give ke the same deal he got
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:24 pm to finallyfastohio
quote:
It's the dealerships decision don't think the ncaa will can do anything about that.
They can rule that selling cars to 50 athletes at reduced rates is extra benefits. The dealership can do whatever they want, you are correct. The NCAA can interpret what the players are getting any way they want. The burden will be for OSU to show that other students got the same deal over a period of yrs.
Not to mention the dealers were guest of players at the NC game and other games.
This post was edited on 5/8/11 at 8:25 pm
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:31 pm to Alahunter
quote:
They can rule that selling cars to 50 athletes at reduced rates is extra benefits
This isn't even close to what happened.
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:33 pm to KillerNut9
Really? Article says over the last several yrs, up to 50 athletes purchased cars through them. It also states they were guest of players at 7 football games, including the 07 NC game and 08 Fiesta Bowl.
So, they bought cars at alleged reduced rates, from people they gave tickets to. Nothing fishy abuot that.
So, they bought cars at alleged reduced rates, from people they gave tickets to. Nothing fishy abuot that.
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:36 pm to Alahunter
It was said that every ncaa rule was followed so we will siee if u guys get your way
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:36 pm to Alahunter
Oklahoma can attest that there is nothing to see in situations like this. 
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:38 pm to CapstoneGrad06
I def agree its greasy but if no ncaa or us rules were broken what can the ncaa do about it
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:40 pm to finallyfastohio
quote:
It was said that every ncaa rule was followed so we will siee if u guys get your way
You mean.. Ohio St said that. The same people who said they did no wrong and then 4 days later admitted they did, then 2 or 3 weeks later self imposed penalties on their own coach. Ok.
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:42 pm to finallyfastohio
quote:
I def agree its greasy but if no ncaa or us rules were broken what can the ncaa do about it
TN players had to pay back $$$ because they got VIP pass to a club even though it's offer to the general public so YES IT"S STILL A VIOLATION for OSU players
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:43 pm to finallyfastohio
quote:
but if no ncaa or us rules were broken what can the ncaa do about it
ur problem is you keep thinking it is a black or white issue when it's not
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:43 pm to Alahunter
At least it Ohio state does go down bamahunter will be able to sleep again.
Be careful man I was hoping.usc and auburn got the hammer. It sucks when the cloud come your way
Be careful man I was hoping.usc and auburn got the hammer. It sucks when the cloud come your way
Posted on 5/8/11 at 8:44 pm to finallyfastohio
It's come our way in a big way the past decade. I want a scorched earth and every team to get as harsh as Bama got when they are caught now. 
Popular
Back to top


2


