Started By
Message

re: More LHSAA… they want to allow one free transfer again…

Posted on 2/26/26 at 9:44 am to
Posted by sk1991
Member since Jan 2016
47 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 9:44 am to
They can vote against it if they want. The legislature will then require public school athletics to fall under the DOE, effectively dissolving the LHSAA. A few states have done this recently and there is current legislation and precedence across the country in recent years. There were several meetings about this over the past year and it is clear they mean it.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38031 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 9:45 am to
quote:

I think the new association ship has sailed. Also, you say conservatives wanting school choice, but pretty much the one time transfer is universally disliked by both public and private schools.



because we dont have 100% school choice in LA like we should.

This is the main reason I want this to pass....and its not going to pass this time but it will within the next year.

100% school choice is coming and it will be glorious. Yall complain about teacher unions...this is the reason we need 100% school choice. no strings attached so long as its an accredited school. Im hoping it gets academies to open that use the alpha program and slowly gets rid of a lot of teachers and the bloat that comes with that.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
35075 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 9:50 am to
More pressing issues but nil will grow.

Violence at games
Ever increasing gap between haves and have nots
Waning attendance
Shortage of young people staying in or getting into coaching
Travel ball/ aau mentality
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54815 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 9:50 am to
What needs to be said about this is that everyone will vote for their schools’ self-interest as they should. That’s the danger of a principal-run organization
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38031 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 9:52 am to
quote:

What needs to be said about this is that everyone will vote for their schools’ self-interest as they should. That’s the danger of a principal-run organization



of course

in the end it wont matter though...legislation is going to make this pass and then they are going to eventually pass full school choice and they dont give a frick how much whining the teachers union does.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
35075 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 9:52 am to
If hs sports falls under state or doe control - I’ll definitely be done.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
7235 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Like anything it will hurt some schools and help others…


It's not 50/50 though. It'll be like 90/10, which is why the majority of schools, even privates, are against it. There are a lot of public schools that would benefit from that too.
Posted by 03 West CoChamps
Member since Sep 2024
867 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 10:05 am to
Free transfer in HS is so stupid. High School sports isn't about coaches recruiting and building teams through transfers. Everyone wants their school to do it until their son/daughter doesn't get playing time because of transfer and all hell breaks loose. Plenty of parents will have paid their dues for 10+ years in a school then a transfer will take PT and it will be a huge problem.
Posted by sk1991
Member since Jan 2016
47 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 10:58 am to
Exactly, the committee made it very clear...


Tier 2
Legislatures almost never jump straight to creating a brand-new state athletics agency (Tier 1). That is expensive, politically heavy, and triggers fears of government overreach. What usually happens first is exactly what the committee recommended: a statutory or contractual oversight relationship with the state education department.

So the likely sequence is:

A bill is filed requiring a Cooperative Endeavor Agreement with the Department of Education.
This will frame the issue as student protection, due process, and transparency, not as “taking over” the LHSAA. That framing is critical and mirrors Florida and Georgia.

LHSAA initially resists, but negotiates.
In every state where this happened, the athletic association argues independence and tradition. Then, once the Legislature shows it has the votes, the association pivots to shaping the agreement rather than blocking it.

Once a CEA exists, LDOE gains review authority, reporting power, and leverage over eligibility appeals and governance standards. It will not micromanage games, but it will control process, compliance, and civil-rights exposure.

Courts will support the Legislature if challenged.
Brentwood v. TSSAA and similar cases make it very hard for an athletic association to argue it is purely private when it governs public school students. Any lawsuit claiming “you cannot regulate us” will almost certainly fail.

Tier 1 is leverage.
This is important. Even if Tier 1 is not enacted, its presence in the report signals: if Tier 2 oversight is ignored or undermined, the state can escalate to full structural control later. Tier 2 is LHSAA allowing a one time transfer.

What will happen. Principals will vote down the one time transfer today.
Tier 2 will pass in the 2026 session in some form, probably softened in language but real in effect. LHSAA will remain, but with state supervision, transparency rules, and due-process standards. Over time, that will fundamentally change how eligibility, transfers, and governance operate, even if the logo on the door stays the same.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
7235 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:05 am to
But suppose the private schools aren't okay with the oversight? A lot of private school folks are also those who back elections.
Posted by 03 West CoChamps
Member since Sep 2024
867 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:07 am to
Who is even pushing for this? Who wants the 1 time free transfer?
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38031 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:


Exactly, the committee made it very clear...


Tier 2
Legislatures almost never jump straight to creating a brand-new state athletics agency (Tier 1). That is expensive, politically heavy, and triggers fears of government overreach. What usually happens first is exactly what the committee recommended: a statutory or contractual oversight relationship with the state education department.

So the likely sequence is:

A bill is filed requiring a Cooperative Endeavor Agreement with the Department of Education.
This will frame the issue as student protection, due process, and transparency, not as “taking over” the LHSAA. That framing is critical and mirrors Florida and Georgia.

LHSAA initially resists, but negotiates.
In every state where this happened, the athletic association argues independence and tradition. Then, once the Legislature shows it has the votes, the association pivots to shaping the agreement rather than blocking it.

Once a CEA exists, LDOE gains review authority, reporting power, and leverage over eligibility appeals and governance standards. It will not micromanage games, but it will control process, compliance, and civil-rights exposure.

Courts will support the Legislature if challenged.
Brentwood v. TSSAA and similar cases make it very hard for an athletic association to argue it is purely private when it governs public school students. Any lawsuit claiming “you cannot regulate us” will almost certainly fail.

Tier 1 is leverage.
This is important. Even if Tier 1 is not enacted, its presence in the report signals: if Tier 2 oversight is ignored or undermined, the state can escalate to full structural control later. Tier 2 is LHSAA allowing a one time transfer.

What will happen. Principals will vote down the one time transfer today.
Tier 2 will pass in the 2026 session in some form, probably softened in language but real in effect. LHSAA will remain, but with state supervision, transparency rules, and due-process standards. Over time, that will fundamentally change how eligibility, transfers, and governance operate, even if the logo on the door stays the same.




:bow: :bow:

but you will have tons of idiots screaming....my tradition.


this is all leading to 100% school choice in the state and forcing schools to compete. its about removing barriers that stop people from transferring now. Not to encourage but to remove punitive punishment.


because they know if they pass school choice but LHSAA is still punishing kids for transferring, LHSAA will lose their arse in court and that could open whole other can of worms.
This post was edited on 2/26/26 at 11:09 am
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54815 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Who is even pushing for this? Who wants the 1 time free transfer?


Look on Facebook comments lol
Posted by 03 West CoChamps
Member since Sep 2024
867 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:14 am to
I don't have Facebook. I'm just genuinely curious who wants this 1 time free transfers? Just the kids that don't like the PT they are getting and want to go somewhere so they can play? Tough shite, that's life.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
7235 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:19 am to
There's are some low IQ people who keep spouting school choice but don't acknowledge this does absolutely nothing in terms of changing which schools kids can attend. Public schools aren't going to magically get different funding because of this. Your zoning still matters. Even if you went parish-wide, that still doesn't solve out of parish issues. If this stuff passes, long term we're just looking at scholastic sports slowly transitioning to club sports. Some sports like soccer already have school teams considered second tier to club equivalent. I imagine that'll start to happen with other sports.
Posted by sk1991
Member since Jan 2016
47 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:35 am to
This is coming from the Louisiana Legislature which is why it will happen whether the principals vote for it or not.
Posted by 03 West CoChamps
Member since Sep 2024
867 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:36 am to
Ok but why? What is the rational for the legislature to push this?
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
27427 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:43 am to
What's to stop schools who don't want this to happen to build their own league? You lose the designation a state champion?
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54815 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Ok but why? What is the rational for the legislature to push this?


The same reason we have closed primaries now… pressure from above
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49403 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:46 am to
quote:

What's to stop schools who don't want this to happen to build their own league? You lose the designation a state champion?


Ultimately, the public schools don't have this option because tax dollars fund them.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram