- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lions 19 @ Cowboys 20 Final - ABC/ESPN
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:31 pm to OldManRiver
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:31 pm to OldManRiver
quote:This is why Detroit briefed the refs before the game on this play
I think the issue is that Detroit tried to get a little tricky and have multiple OL around the ref in order to confuse the D. They didn’t anticipate confusing the ref as well
There is no issue. No excuses
0
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:31 pm to RB10
quote:
Ryan Clark just went over the entire play. The formation was clean.
I’ve watched it 10 times
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:31 pm to bad93ex
70 lined up at G, on the inside of Sewell
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:31 pm to bad93ex
quote:
So 68 was really the only eligible OL on that play?
Correct. I think 58 also went to the ref to clarify that he was not eligible. My only guess on that is because the numbers are so similar.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:32 pm to bad93ex
quote:
He lined up at OT
I don’t think so. I think he was at guard.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:33 pm to RB10
Just showed it again. 70 never spoke to the official. He clearly went out and spoke to 68 & 58.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:33 pm to RB10
quote:
Two players didn’t report. 68 reported as eligible. They said 70 reported, who then lined up at guard. Why would a player who’s lining up at OG ever go report as eligible?
That’s the $1mm question
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:34 pm to RB10
Just had quotes from Allen. He said that 70 reported. He clearly fricked up. Very clearly never looks at 70.
70 reported as eligible multiple times in the game and he got the number wrong.
70 reported as eligible multiple times in the game and he got the number wrong.
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 11:35 pm
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:34 pm to RB10
Ref just doubled down postgame that 70 reported not 68
Either the ref got the confused or the 2 OL fricked up and wont admit it
Either the ref got the confused or the 2 OL fricked up and wont admit it
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:35 pm to RB10
Basic logic says a guy lining up at fricking guard would never be going to the ref to report eligibility, but some are slow to this
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:35 pm to OldManRiver
I think Brad Allen was used to saying 70 was eligible from earlier in the game and fricked up.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:35 pm to RB10
quote:
Just showed it again. 70 never spoke to the official. He clearly went out and spoke to 68 & 58.
The frickup here is clearly on the ref since he goes and reports to the defense on who is eligible and never announces it on the mic. #68 is wide open since the defense believes he is ineligible, Detroit had multiple afterwards to score again and came up short.
Don’t put this on Dallas for the refs fricking up once again in tight situations.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:35 pm to OldManRiver
quote:
Either the ref got the confused or the 2 OL fricked up and wont admit it
I don’t think Another player can’t report someone as eiligible. 70 never spoke to the official. 68 did.
ETA: Meaning you have to report yourself as eligible.
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 11:38 pm
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:36 pm to purplengold1
Not only did he double down on the 70 reporting, he also is claiming they threw a flag for illegal formation due to 70 being covered up (because he was at guard)
They're really going to die on this hill, aren't they? The NFL has to suspend him immediately.
They're really going to die on this hill, aren't they? The NFL has to suspend him immediately.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:36 pm to bad93ex
quote:
So 68 was really the only eligible OL on that play?
Possibly. I can’t positively tell from the angle if the guy that was split out wide right was on or off the line. Looks to me like he’s on, which would have made him the eligible receiver on that side.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:36 pm to OldManRiver
quote:In no parallel universe is a guy lining up at guard going to the ref to report eligible for a play whilst at guard
Either the ref got the confused or the 2 OL fricked up and wont admit it
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:36 pm to bad93ex
quote:
Don’t put this on Dallas for the refs fricking up once again in tight situations.
No one is putting this on Dallas other than the conspiracy nuts.
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 11:37 pm
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:40 pm to purplengold1
quote:
think Brad Allen was used to saying 70 was eligible from earlier in the game and fricked up.
The statement he released suggests this. He still fricked up though.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:41 pm to blackandgolddude
quote:I believe the ref said 70 was at tackle.
Not only did he double down on the 70 reporting, he also is claiming they threw a flag for illegal formation due to 70 being covered up (because he was at guard
Posted on 12/30/23 at 11:42 pm to shel311
quote:
I believe the ref said 70 was at tackle.
The ref clearly has no clue who was where.
Page 40 of 44
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News