- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LHSAA 2025 Superdome thread
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:49 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 12/13/25 at 7:49 pm to lsupride87
You mean do away with seeding?
1
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:02 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:Do away with the asinine seeding they have now that everyone knows is incorrect . Not a single human being thought Teurlings was a legit 2 seed
You mean do away with seeding?
This post was edited on 12/13/25 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:04 pm to lsupride87
quote:
They have to find a way to put Catholic on other side of draw. Only team that can compete with Karr Would be awesome in Dome
Or… hear me out…
Catholic should not lose 2 regular season games.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:05 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Do away with the asinine seeding they have now that everyone knows is incorrect
The seeding is a math equation… and Catholic had a lower seed because they lost in nondistrict
Posted on 12/13/25 at 8:42 pm to Choupique19
quote:
Catholic should not lose 2 regular season games.
You’re right but they could also not schedule any competition and just skate through. If what’s being floated occurs, next years schedule will be another great experience for the team.
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:10 pm to TROLA
Care to elaborate?
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:36 pm to Choupique19
quote:
Or… hear me out… Catholic should not lose 2 regular season games.
Catholic would have had a combined score of 650-12 with teurlings schedule
Posted on 12/13/25 at 9:48 pm to lsupride87
on an unrelated note - you hunting thursday?
Posted on 12/13/25 at 11:09 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Do away with the asinine seeding they have now
I’ve been around HS football my whole life and I’ve never heard anyone complain about the seeding
I don’t know man, something about how you think you know everything really gets under my skin
- and yes, I realize that’s a ‘me’ problem.. I’m working on it 
Posted on 12/14/25 at 8:38 am to TheRouxGuru
Thoughts as someone who hasn’t watched a high school football game in many years - Edna Karr was extremely impressive. Looked like a college team
Posted on 12/14/25 at 8:38 am to TheRouxGuru
quote:and in the old days folks complained of having to play the two best teams in bi district or regional round(mainly catholic league getting the then powerful nola and jeff parish schools and shreve getting monroe...) so here we are. The two best teams have indeed not met in first or second rounds any longer - just some crazier travel earlier on. generally speaking the best teams are ending up in semis and finals.
I’ve been around HS football my whole life and I’ve never heard anyone complain about the seeding
Posted on 12/14/25 at 8:40 am to TheRouxGuru
quote:What?
I’ve been around HS football my whole life and I’ve never heard anyone complain about the seeding
The seeding has always been bad 2023 had holy cross as the 1 seed and Shreve as the 2 seed
1 game COMBINED was won by them in the playoffs.
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 8:45 am
Posted on 12/14/25 at 10:28 am to lsupride87
quote:
2023 had holy cross as the 1 seed and Shreve as the 2 seed
There was NO human input into that. It’s strictly what the math spits out
If I remember right Karr had a year where they had a few forfeits? But I do remember them whipping that Holy Cross team. I was telling people then HC was a paper tiger that year
Posted on 12/14/25 at 10:50 am to DreadDub
quote:
I think Shaw thought SCC only had one timeout left. Even after the helmet toss. Only thing that explains them still kneeling on 2nd and 3rd down. A cluster all around for that staff.
The timeout got restored with the penalty stoppage of the clock.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 10:52 am to chalmetteowl
quote:And? shite in shite out
There was NO human input into that. It’s strictly what the math spits out
Posted on 12/14/25 at 11:19 am to lsupride87
quote:
Do away with the asinine seeding they have now that everyone knows is incorrect . Not a single human being thought Teurlings was a legit 2 seed
What do you propose as an alternative?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 11:22 am to BigTigerJoe
quote:the clock was stopped for penalty enforcement when the TO was called. Under 2 mins of a half offended team has option for starting clock on ready for play or snap, provided the clocked would not have ordinarily been stopped after play IE incomplete pass or ball out of bounds.
quote:
I think Shaw thought SCC only had one timeout left. Even after the helmet toss. Only thing that explains them still kneeling on 2nd and 3rd down. A cluster all around for that staff.
The timeout got restored with the penalty stoppage of the clock.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:29 pm to chinese58
I know we have some refs on here and maybe it was discussed but if that kid from Shaw didn't throw his helmet up in the air but helmet was off, would they have still been penalized?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:25 pm to Jenious
quote:If he took it off to celebrate, draw attention or taunt(which can be verbal) still a foul.
I know we have some refs on here and maybe it was discussed but if that kid from Shaw didn't throw his helmet up in the air but helmet was off, would they have still been penalized?
The realistic exception being if say a players helmet got knocked off kilter and he simply took it off - no foul.
Youthful excuberance and UNS can be a fine line.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:42 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:Funny thing in 1999 I sat with some Bear parents for semifianal with ECA and in pregame they were lamenting being on the same side of the bracket with ECA. I simply pointed out that so y'all think being on the West Monroe side would be better? Reminding them that bears were like 2-6 vs that monroe district since moving up to state's highest class.....
quote:
Do away with the asinine seeding they have now that everyone knows is incorrect . Not a single human being thought Teurlings was a legit 2 seed
What do you propose as an alternative?
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 6:44 pm
Page 22 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News