Started By
Message

Judge Rules Players Can Go From NFL Training Camp Back to College

Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:02 pm
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
61011 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:02 pm
quote:

As the NCAA continues to lose rulings challenging the implementation of its new eligibility rules, a new consequence has emerged: Some football players who have participated in NFL training camps—and in some cases, even NFL preseason games—can now return to college.

On Wednesday night, a local judge in Louisiana granted a temporary restraining order allowing 16 former college football players a fifth year of eligibility. A number of these players have participated in NFL training camps and/or appeared in NFL preseason games. 

The lawsuit itself wasn’t specifically about the players’ professional participation. Instead, the case was one of many filed challenging the implementation of the NCAA’s “age-based” eligibility policy.

The policy, passed in June, stated players would have five years to complete five seasons of eligibility (up from four) starting on their 19th birthday or when they entered college—whichever came first.



LINK
This post was edited on 8/20/26 at 3:03 pm
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
70107 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:02 pm to
Clown world rolls on.
Posted by JimTiger72
LA
Member since Jun 2023
19925 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:03 pm to
I’ve seen a lot of overreactions to this & I don’t like it but it seems like this is just a one time thing for a specific group of players
This post was edited on 8/20/26 at 3:09 pm
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
61011 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:03 pm to
Posted by JimTiger72
LA
Member since Jun 2023
19925 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

to allow NFL players to go back to college football


See this is the clickbait stuff that I see people overreacting to

ETA - Case in point: Ryan Clark’s dumbass misinterpretation of what this means

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 8/20/26 at 3:12 pm
Posted by cpp2208
Member since Oct 2018
3257 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:12 pm to
We could use all the help at FSU. Welcome back guys.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
41838 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:16 pm to
Reminder that you don't hate lawyers enough.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
80905 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:19 pm to
With Schefter being against it none must be going back to Michigan.
Posted by ProjectP2294
West St. Louis County
Member since May 2007
79651 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

I’ve seen a lot of overreactions to this & I don’t like it but it seems like this is just a one time thing for a specific group of players


In general I'm tired of the judges making dumb rulings to make guys eligible that shouldn't be.

I don't feel like this is necessarily one of those cases though. The NCAA purposely waited to rule on 5for5 to try to make it harder for 2022's to gain the extra year that everyone before them and everyone after them got.

This is just attempting to give them that year. And these guys may not have attempted to go pro if they knew they had another year in college.
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36749 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

I’ve seen a lot of overreactions to this & I don’t like it but it seems like this is just a one time thing for a specific group of players


Correct, it’s just if you enrolled specifically in 2022. It doesn’t apply to anyone who enrolled in any year prior. It basically just matches the policy that the NCAA is now implementing for everyone who enrolled in 2023 and onward for the Class of 2022 also.

But obviously, this will not be the final lawsuit, and who knows where the next one will lead.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
61011 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
61011 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:46 pm to
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36749 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

The NCAA purposely waited to rule on 5for5 to try to make it harder for 2022's to gain the extra year


They probably should’ve just allowed it for 2022 players too when they changed the policy. Nobody (not literally nobody, I’m sure…) from the 2021 class would’ve tried to come back after being away from the NCAA game for a year-and-a-half at that point. Instead because they didn’t allow it for 2022, it’s just more chaos now.
This post was edited on 8/20/26 at 4:03 pm
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
50604 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 4:01 pm to
Someone should ole yeller the NCAA before it gets uglier
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
132639 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

JimTiger72


Never link ryan clark again

Posted by 1ranter1
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
10944 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Nobody (not literally nobody, I’m sure…) from the 2021 class would’ve tried to come back


From the class of 2021? Man they probably got MFers 30 years old thinking about that 5th year
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
5634 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 4:38 pm to
How the hell can a judge have any authority at all on this matter?

Judges can just rule random shite about football leagues?

What possible jurisdiction does this judge have to make such an order?

What the hell is going on?
Posted by themunch
bottom of the list
Member since Jan 2007
72478 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 4:57 pm to
All I see is Ole Piss pulling out all the stops to win now, while belittling LSU for trying to do so.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23937 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

but it seems like this is just a one time thing for a specific group of players
The problem is, that now sets a precedent.

"Jack Pyburn and Zxvavian Harris got to last year, so I'm suing because it's unfair I don't get to this year. Allowing those guys to come back hindered my progress and earning potential, and I deserve another shot".
Something to that effect.

Go in front of the right judge, and you will get this approved.
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36749 posts
Posted on 8/20/26 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

"Jack Pyburn and Zxvavian Harris got to last year, so I'm suing because it's unfair I don't get to this year. Allowing those guys to come back hindered my progress and earning potential, and I deserve another shot". Something to that effect.


The 2023 guys are already getting it, so it won’t be an issue moving forward. The 2022 guys are suing because they’re not getting what 2023 (and beyond) will get.

Guys who enrolled in 2020 (and all the way back to 2017) already got the chance for a 5th year with Covid, even if they never traditionally redshirted. So maybe you’re looking at some 2021 guys (who haven’t played cfb since 2024, because it wouldn’t apply to any 2021 guys who redshirted/played last year) to try to latch on, but that’s pretty much it.
This post was edited on 8/20/26 at 5:17 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram