- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Peyton Manning the Michael Jordan of football?
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:01 pm to Crompdaddy8
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:01 pm to Crompdaddy8
Michael Jordan was 0-3 against UF in college?
1
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:01 pm to Crompdaddy8
You'll never get a fair response to this question.
Jordan one of 5 players on court at all times
Manning one of 22 players on field less than 50% of time.
Too many variables out of Manning's control. Doesn't play defense or special teams, I could go on and on.
When it is all said and done, Peyton Manning will be regarded as the best to ever play his position.
Jordan one of 5 players on court at all times
Manning one of 22 players on field less than 50% of time.
Too many variables out of Manning's control. Doesn't play defense or special teams, I could go on and on.
When it is all said and done, Peyton Manning will be regarded as the best to ever play his position.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:04 pm to joshnorris14
Man, Florida fans cling to that one stat that no one else cares about a little too much.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:05 pm to TotesMcGotes
It is quite pathetic.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:05 pm to Crompdaddy8
quote:
Is Peyton Manning the Michael Jordan of football?
Maybe if we are talking regular season...maybe.
Jordan just had the ability to get it done in the playoffs that Manning seems to lack.
If you combine Peyton in the regular season with Eli in the post season, you might have 1 Manning resembling something close to Jordan.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:06 pm to Crompdaddy8
no.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:07 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
All it takes is the Marino vs. Dilfer debate to be brought up and your argument immediately blows.
No, it really doesn't. Dan Marino is remembered as an incredible QB but because he doesn't have RINGS, he isn't seriously considered in the GOAT debate. Trent Dilfer is simply remembered as an average/mediocre QB who ended up being on a team that won a Super Bowl.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:07 pm to Crompdaddy8
quote:
He'll end up breaking all passing records and finish 16-0
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:10 pm to Crompdaddy8
Your trolling is awful.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:10 pm to TH03
quote:
TH03
Your hatred of Peyton is pathetic
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:11 pm to RollTide1987
quote:And that's a joke.
Dan Marino is remembered as an incredible QB but because he doesn't have RINGS, he isn't seriously considered in the GOAT debate.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:13 pm to RollTide1987
Roethlisberger is better than Peyton because RINGS, am I right?
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:14 pm to TH03
Manning is the all time leader in playoff losses and int's. What a great thread.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:15 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
And that's a joke.
No, it isn't. I'd put Montana, Elway, Unitas, and Manning over Marino.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:16 pm to Crompdaddy8
Best there ever was.
So yes.
So yes.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:16 pm to RollTide1987
No!
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:17 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
Roethlisberger is better than Peyton because RINGS, am I right?
No but if you're trying to make a direct comparison between Peyton and Jordan (which is silly from the get go because of the different sports thing) then post season success is very relevant.
But, if "rings" is an unacceptable metric then you can use the fact that Peyton lost a Super Bowl that was in his control while Jordan never lost a Finals.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:17 pm to TotesMcGotes
no that's absurd
a more realistic comparison is saying Brady is better than Manning because he has rings.
or MJ is better than lebron because he has more rings
no one is saying dilfer is better than Marino and to bring that comparison up to discredit the argument is the definition of disingenuous.
a more realistic comparison is saying Brady is better than Manning because he has rings.
or MJ is better than lebron because he has more rings
no one is saying dilfer is better than Marino and to bring that comparison up to discredit the argument is the definition of disingenuous.
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:18 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
Roethlisberger is better than Peyton because RINGS, am I right?
Once again...you think I'm only looking at rings, but I am not. Stats, rings, playoff appearances, and playoff performances all come into the equation when you are trying to judge which QB is the greatest. A QB could put up over 100,000 yards in his career during the regular season, but if he consistently chokes in the post season and fails to win a championship, how can you call him the greatest who ever played the game?
This post was edited on 9/29/13 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 9/29/13 at 6:18 pm to TH03
But why? If you can pick and choose criteria, I should be able to apply it.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News