Started By
Message

re: I Posted on the OT as well but: Inside the Mind of the High School Sports Parent in 2025

Posted on 8/21/25 at 8:49 am to
Posted by dek81572
Bossier City
Member since Apr 2012
1369 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 8:49 am to
quote:

I was on scholarship at UNC for 2 years. Transferred to UGA and was invited to walk on. Beat the #5 scholarship player like a drum all year long (to the tune of paying for all my beer and food out of his pocket) and never made the traveling squad. At least the coach was straight with me; he said his scholarship guys were traveling and that’s it. He recruited me in HS and knew I could play; it was the way it was.


Just out of curiosity, why did you leave a D-1 scholarship to be a walk-on at another D-1 program? Did you not get to travel at UNC? I don't know when you were at Georgia but I know they were a powerhouse team a while back with Bubba Watson, Kevin Kisner, Sepp Straka, Brian Harmon, Keith Mitchell, Harris English and Russel Henley just to name a few. Did you play with any of those guys?
Posted by Tarpon08
Cut Off, LA
Member since Dec 2014
8125 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Why? Is the school board obsessed with winning? Does every school in the state have the expectation of winning a state title? Is that the goal?


Because at any school worth a frick if your program is not competitive you won't be the coach for very long. You're the only one on this thread that mentioned state titles I'm just talking about winning/being competitive. That's the way it works sorry if this is news to you.

Once again you can be a good man/mentor and still put the best 9 players on the field to win games. The two aren't mutually exclusive.
This post was edited on 8/21/25 at 8:57 am
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
43129 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 8:58 am to
quote:

he is at a private school too.


Ah geez. There’s the hitch. Thanks
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80050 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:03 am to
quote:

what he is describing isnt even within the rules in most states. not even possible.


Which part? The multiple varsity teams? I find that somewhat hard to believe. Only one team is eligible for the state tournament in Ohio, but you can have multiple varsities.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36771 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:07 am to
quote:


Struck a nerve?


nope, you just sound completely ignorant

quote:

I guess it’s also about parents’ egos.


yea we all woke up one day and said...know what sounds fun...giving up my weekends to go sit in the sun all day and spend couple thousand a year

or it could be we look around and understand at the bigger schools not a single rec league kid makes the hs team

and again...there are 6 or 7 leagues across the whole state for 13/14u in rec ball....how do you suggest most in the state play at that age if it isnt travel

and do you really think the good players do not have private coaches?
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36771 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:09 am to
quote:



Which part? The multiple varsity teams? I find that somewhat hard to believe. Only one team is eligible for the state tournament in Ohio, but you can have multiple varsities.


all of it

#1- most state do not allow more than 1 varsity team per school

#2 most schools are land locked, cant afford to build another field

#3 most schools cant afford multiple coaching staffs not to mention the number of coaches and volunteers is locked by the governing body


none of what you said is remotely feasible at public schools in the south and not feasible at a single school in LA. not 1
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53780 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:11 am to
quote:

That good man doesn't have a job for very long if he doesn't win.
except if he’s Chalmette’s basketball coach
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
39940 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:11 am to
quote:

The part about playing the same players on JV and Varsity is strange.



I played both JV and freshman team in football.

Wouldn't leave the field on the freshman team and would get a few reps on defense or fullback + special teams on JV. I would have hardly played if I was strictly JV.

only sucked when we played two games in one day, which was a couple of times.

now that i type that out it is no wonder my meniscus was ripped to shite by the end of that season
This post was edited on 8/21/25 at 10:13 am
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
39940 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:17 am to
quote:

if you want equal playing time, go play golf


any half way decent golf program will never do equal playing time.

at my school back in the day, they would play a weekly round to see who would make the tournament. The cut line was usually around 78
Posted by Xenophon
Aspen
Member since Feb 2006
42629 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:18 am to
quote:

He assured everyone that no player would be placed outside of their class—regardless of talent, stature, or personal connections


From the article.. if the coach said this he should be fired on the spot. This is nonsense. But there’s now way that’s what was actually said.

And what does this even mean? Is it just a shot at freshman? What’s appropriate placement for Soph/Juniors?
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36771 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:19 am to
quote:

any half way decent golf program will never do equal playing time.

at my school back in the day, they would play a weekly round to see who would make the tournament. The cut line was usually around 78


i was talking about in general, not for the team


its laughable all the parents on here are just like the mom in the OP where there baby should get equal playing time despite not being as good and not working hard.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36771 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:21 am to
quote:

From the article.. if the coach said this he should be fired on the spot. This is nonsense. But there’s now way that’s what was actually said.

And what does this even mean? Is it just a shot at freshman? What’s appropriate placement for Soph/Juniors?


i agree

i took it as freshman would not play JV above soph or juniors. soph wouldnt start jv over juniors and seniors would be playing varsity then juniors to fill in gaps

no caoch would ever say that and its made up BS completely.
Posted by Yewkindewit
Near Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
21624 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:23 am to
Our HS coach played the best players. I remember an 8th grader getting a start at HS shortstop before we had a separate campus for HS and middle school. Once, a senior was pulled in a high stakes game only to have a freshman come in to suicide bunt in a game winning scenario. And he delivered. Coach said he was the best bunter he had seen in practice.

Also, one of my freeshman sons (tall LHer) was brought up to pitch for varsity, travelled with Varsitsy to select games to pitch, and also played 1B and pitched for JV.

When another son on JV was a freshman 2B position player a senior who never saw the field on the varsity team played down to play a position and pitch for JV. Strange but it happened.

It’s basically coach’s team so it is what it is!
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
76602 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:26 am to
I sat for a good portion of my senior season because I was in a batting slump.

My dad’s statement to me at the time was that if I was better I would be playing.
This post was edited on 8/21/25 at 10:26 am
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36771 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:31 am to
quote:

I sat for a good portion of my senior season because I was in a batting slump.

My dad’s statement to me at the time was that if I was better I would be playing.




exactly...some of the posters need to understand playing HS sports is not a right. You are there to represent the school and try and win the school a championship, not be babied

bottom line is its the coaches job to be trying to find someone better to replace you with at all times. And its your job as the player, to make sure there is nobody better to replace you with.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
76602 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:33 am to
Our coach also once sat a player for a prolonged period because his parents asked him why he wasn’t playing more.

Coach gave zero shits.
This post was edited on 8/21/25 at 10:33 am
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36771 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Our coach also once sat a player for a prolonged period because his parents asked him why he wasn’t playing more.

Coach gave zero shits


as it should be

i know a couple coaches over here that if you want to talk playing time...the kid has to set up the meeting...but he doesnt just set it up with the coach, he has to invite the player and parents of the player that he thinks he should be playing over, to the meeting also.

everyone thinks they should be playing in private, none want to confront the player they think they are better than


I know others that will discuss playing time with the player only and if the parents ask, they do exactly what you just said.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80050 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 11:06 am to
quote:

none of what you said is remotely feasible at public schools in the south and not feasible at a single school in LA. not 1


This isn't true, but it's not worth arguing about since your mind is clearly made up.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36771 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 11:30 am to
quote:

This isn't true, but it's not worth arguing about since your mind is clearly made up.


ok you explain to me LHSAA rules then.

you explain how that school who can only hire so many coaches and has a cap on volunteer staff is supposed to take and develop 50-75 extra kids, find a field for them to practice on, find time for them to practice while still competing for championships

please explain how all of this is remotely possible for a public school, who's funding is already very limited

again explain it to me within the catholic school system here, most of the catholic schools are barely staying afloat as it is.

my mind is made up because im pretty educated on the subject...but please educate me



on top of that, HS sports isnt about participation trophies, its about the best in the school representing the school against the best of other schools.

what should they not hand out D and F grades either? let me guess you think colleges should be ACT/Sat testing optional too.

its not really arguing, im telling you its not remotely feasible for this to happen

but lets say they did work out the field and time thing...still zero incentive for a coach who is already severely underpaid to put in extra time to coach another 50+_ kids just so they can have an experience. If they want to have the experience than they should work harder and get better on their own and make the team
Posted by SECSolomonGrundy
Slaughter Swamp
Member since Jun 2012
18053 posts
Posted on 8/21/25 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Once again you can be a good man/mentor and still put the best 9 players on the field to win games. The two aren't mutually exclusive.


No shite. I never said they cant. I just said i would prefer a good man over a win at all costs type coach. And i said that most schools have no shot at winning state.

Winning is great, but it sure aint everything. The culture behind high school sports has gotten out of control.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram