Started By
Message

re: How Good Was Barry Bonds?

Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:13 pm to
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
84097 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:13 pm to
I found my old glove from grade school. It was a Bobby Bonds signature glove.
Posted by Hou_Lawyer
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2019
2084 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:18 pm to
All of the “best ever” idiots in this thread. Was Lance Armstrong the best ever after we found out he was doping?

Ruth did it naturally and look at the stats comparative to his peers during the same era. He’s the best ever.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

He’s the best player to ever play the game. Before or after he cheated


This is how I look at it.

He was one of the best players in the game before he started PEDs.

He started PEDs in an era where probably 95% or more players weee using and he was still one of the best.

So either way, he was an all time great. Easily on the list of the 5-10 best ever.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

He really didn't need to get on roids, he would have broken the record without it,


Here is where I disagree.

He was an average power hitter before steroids. I’m not sure he ever hit more than 30 in a year before using (could be wrong).

While he was still an all time great before juicing, he wasn’t an all time great power hitter before juicing
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
61255 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

Canseco and the As were juicing in the mid 80s but nobody from that era is ever lumped in with the steroid group. It’s all bullshite


I’ve told this story before, but it’s why I loathe Bud Selig and all the self-righteous, sanctimonious, hypocritical beyond belief baseball writers who covered the sport from those 80s teams to the “I’m shocked there’s steroid use going on in this establishment” years of the early aughts.

I was 10 years old in 1988. Loved all sports—baseball was by far my favorite—but I kept up with all of them. And there were probably whispers of steroids in sports before this, but Ben Johnson (alluded to earlier) beating Carl Lewis in the 100 in the ‘88 Olympic Games in Seoul was a really big deal. Brought steroids out to the mainstream like nothing that had come before. So, as an interested 10-year-old, I did a 5th grade science or social studies project on steroids in sports. One of those 3-sided, folding boards projects. I read some books, some Encyclopedia Britanica articles for a week or so, and it took my 10-year-old self about 15 minutes to figure out 1 + 1 = 2, and those ‘87/‘88 A’s teams were juiced out of their minds. Not just Canseco and McGwire, but Ricky Henderson, Dave Stewart, Dave Henderson, Carney Langford, Mike Gallego, Bob Welch, Terry Steinbach, hell, even fricking Tony Larussa was busting out of his pants.

I didn’t care—I love the bombs—but 10-year-old me in 1988 knew 100% at least the A’s, and probably a lot of other guys or teams we’re probably doing the same thing. So, I just assumed that was part of the game, through the 90s in MLB and college.(The 1997 LSU baseball team may be my favorite of all time, but if you were too stupid to know they were juicing out of their minds, that’s on YOU). Same thing with MLB. I forget if there was an impetus besides McGwires’s red herring Andro, but frick anybody who’d been watching baseball for any amount of time and all of a sudden caught ethical standards in 2002. frick you all—you all made a shite ton of money turning a blind eye for decades. And if you—Selig and the media—tried to sell your self-righteous being appalled, then you’re either A—and more likely—) completely intellectually dishonest/a fricking liar or B) so Incredibly goddamn stupid you are too incompetent to hold the position you have.

The truth is EVERYBODY knew, and EVERYBODY benefited financially. Until they didn’t. By the way, YOU—the old, self-righteous fan in this thread—would have walked up to bat with syringes sticking out of both arse cheeks if the money at that time was available to you. Just like your heroes Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Ted Williams, Babe Ruth, whoever. The rewards so far outweigh the risks, you’d be stupid not to. And you young, naive children, guess what? Jeff Bagwell? Juiced. Craig Biggio? Juiced? Pudge Rodriguez? Super juiced? And yes, even the holy saints Derek Jeter and Ken Griffey, Jr. themselves—juiced. Not all juice is the same and and not everybody worked as hard on it. Bit this idea that they’re pure as the driven snow and would never? bullshite. Money was too much not to, and at the very least, they wanted to stay on the field and play.


Everybody that could juiced. Everybody that couldn’t, would have. And that’s ok. That doesn’t make them bad people. It makes them people. With families. With wives. With kids, who will assumably have kids who may have kids, etc…And wanting to do whatever you can to take care of generations of descendants can be argued as noble as easily as not. So, everybody needs to get right the frick over themselves.
Posted by 504Voodoo
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2012
13712 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 1:27 am to
quote:

He was amazing before the roids.




He was a HOF'er before the roids.
Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
21189 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 2:09 am to
GOAT
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
38128 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 2:51 am to
quote:


This is how I look at it.

He was one of the best players in the game before he started PEDs.

He started PEDs in an era where probably 95% or more players weee using and he was still one of the best.

So either way, he was an all time great. Easily on the list of the 5-10 best ever.


But he wasn't. And even those around him admitted this is why he started cheating... He was butt-burt he wasn't in the conversation.

There's this strange mythology that before he used, he was otherworldly. He was a great player, another good guy but he wasn't what he became, fricking Paul Bunyun thrown into the GOAT discussion.

PEDs, throws him into that. End of story. We remember him for his dominance and that all occurred when he got that fat head...

Before that he's another All-Star with a noodle arm.

But certainly not Ruthian.
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 2:53 am
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
38128 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 4:12 am to
While the drug naysayers have taken it to an extreme, the counter-reaction has been this cult of Barry Bonds.

So we get...drug teetotaler never induct him...then revisionists, he was the best player EVA! without drugs.

He wasn't ever considered nor thought of as the best ever before his head swelled.

He wasn't even universally considered even the best player in the game...this is revisionist Pirate history. Nobody talked about him in the 90's like they were in total awe. They talked about Griffey a lot. Rickey, Frank Thomas.

It's only his fat head S.F. years where we get this...is he the best player ever?

And if you think 95% of players were using, then more power to you...and you'll never be swayed by pure fandom.
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 4:13 am
Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
11237 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 4:41 am to
quote:

Every time Barry Bonds stepped in the batter’s box from 2001-2005, he was the greatest hitter who ever lived. And likely who ever will live.


You can asterisk anything you want, but this is still fact.
Posted by UncleRuckus
Member since Feb 2013
8786 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 4:42 am to
He’s the best baseball player ever.
Posted by VBFlorida
Florida
Member since Nov 2020
1338 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 5:17 am to
Jim Brown, Earl Campbell, Eric Dickerson, Sanders and OJ Simpson, Payton, Riggins. In that order, Bo Jackson Incomplete.
Posted by JakeFromStateFarm
*wears khakis
Member since Jun 2012
12452 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 5:52 am to
Even if you zero out all of his stats from 2003 on(when baseball started testing and suspending players for steroid use), he still had 613 home runs and 1643 RBIs. If you did the same for fellow steroid abuser, hall of fame DH David Ortiz? 58 home runs, 238 RBIs. Yet one is in the hall because he wasn’t an a-hole to sports writers and the other isn’t.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
63050 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 5:54 am to
In his prime the baseball was the size of a beach ball to bonds.
Posted by Caraway Rye
Member since Oct 2021
5108 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 6:12 am to
Druggie Bonds isnt even good enough to be in the hall of fame

So not even top 236 in major league basebal history

A druggie footnote
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
16664 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 6:28 am to
He was very good before he got on the roids. He was historically great after he got on the stuff in 1999.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
46965 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:00 am to
quote:

Lol Bonds had a lot of HR's before roids and would have broken the HR record by just continuing at a normal pace


No he wouldn't have. He would have never put up the ungodly HR totals between 2001-2004 that ultimately pushed him over the finish line if he didn't juice. That still doesn't change my opinion of him though. Steroids can't fix hand-eye coordination.

His 2004 statline is comical. If you only counted his intentional walks, he would still have finished 4th in the league in walks that season. That is staggering.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
46965 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:04 am to
quote:

He was a HOF'er before the roids.


I think he could have gotten in had he retired after the 1993 season.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
102564 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:19 am to
quote:

I think he could have gotten in had he retired after the 1993 season.


He wouldn't have been eligible until after 1995.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
34991 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 7:43 am to
quote:

Druggie Bonds isnt even good enough to be in the hall of fame

So not even top 236 in major league basebal history

A druggie footnote


some of yall are so fricking naive and dumb as frick. its really laughable.

if you want to go that route....then all those guys from the 50's, 60's yea they are gone too for the "greenies" i.e. fricking speed


Yall really are fricking naive if you dont think 95% of college level and above guys were juicing. Go look at the 80s, even the later 70s. Now once the 90s started, it was game on, no way they were going to let the As continue to dominate.


as far as the question.....he is the best hitter of all time all seasons included. If you want to take away the "steroid" years(which is dumb because 99% of pitchers were using, more then even field players) then he is still a hall of famer and one of the best ever.
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 7:45 am
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram