- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Halladay likely to Phillies (MLB Network)
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:54 pm to geauxlsu07
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:54 pm to geauxlsu07
quote:
so you would have Halliday and a so so Hamels...then what? Moyer? Blanton?
2 man rotation?
What do u have if u dont trade for Halladay? Happ and Hammels and then what?
I expect Hammels to step his game up come playoffs. Hammels, Halladay, Blanton, and Moyer and with that lineup will be fine in the NL...Im more worried about their bullpen
And u can win with just 2 really good pitchers.
0
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:54 pm to LfcSU3520
Halladay to Phils would be bigger than CC to Brewers...
Undefeated with less than a 2 ERA....
Undefeated with less than a 2 ERA....
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:54 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
I'd trade Happ, for sure. Happ, Drabek, and a few other good prospects... I don't know about that.
exactly and IMO it wont happen
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:55 pm to 1ranter1
if im philly im doing this
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:55 pm to geauxlsu07
quote:
so you are saying Halladay and Hamels would be the next Johnson and Schilling?
is it really that doubtful
hamels is going to have a STRONg second half
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:56 pm to geauxlsu07
quote:
exactly and IMO it wont happen
Something will happen.
Halladay is way too big a prize for no one to pony up. And the Blue Jays know they'll have to trade him eventually, that's inevitable at this point.
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:57 pm to Ron Mexico
quote:
hamels is going to have a STRONg second half
I need your crystal fricking ball
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:57 pm to LfcSU3520
quote:
I said that they should definitely open to trading him
My first post was in response to people that think he shouln't be considered to be traded.
quote:
I also said using minor league numbers to judge anything is pointless. Trust me.
And this is bullshite. Stats like wins and ERA are pointless. But SO rates, BB rates,ground ball rates, and opp BA are major tools to grading prospects.
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:57 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
so you are saying Halladay and Hamels would be the next Johnson and Schilling?
If Hamels can pitch well again..They will be good enough..They dont have to be as dominate as Johnson and Schilling with the lineup the Phillies have.
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:58 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
Something will happen.
the Dodgers could jump in the mix and surprise everyone like they did with Manny
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:59 pm to geauxlsu07
quote:
I need your crystal fricking ball
no kidding...this plus Moyer not doing anything in the playoffs
his ability to see the future is astounding.
Posted on 7/24/09 at 5:59 pm to geauxlsu07
quote:so could the Angels
the Dodgers could jump in the mix and surprise everyone like they did with Manny
I don't know enough about the Phillies' system to really make a call on this deal. It seems like a lot, but maybe they have 2 or 3 other pitching prospects that are in the same ballpark as Happ and Drabek?
Posted on 7/24/09 at 6:01 pm to LSUBoo
I could see Dodgers/Angels throwing more players and cash into pot for Halladay.
If the Dodgers were willing to part with Clayton Kershaw it would be a done deal but the kid looks legit.
If the Dodgers were willing to part with Clayton Kershaw it would be a done deal but the kid looks legit.
Posted on 7/24/09 at 6:02 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
Something will happen.
Halladay is way too big a prize for no one to pony up. And the Blue Jays know they'll have to trade him eventually, that's inevitable at this point.
yes
and the fact that this is a 1.5 year rental and not a .5 year rental, if its a rental at all
the jays will get more for him this year than next
Posted on 7/24/09 at 6:02 pm to tduecen
quote:
If the Dodgers were willing to part with Clayton Kershaw it would be a done deal but the kid looks legit.
that would be dumb
Posted on 7/24/09 at 6:03 pm to geauxlsu07
quote:
that would be dumb
Well that much is obvious... its what the jays asked for when Dodgers inquired
Posted on 7/24/09 at 6:03 pm to LfcSU3520
quote:
his ability to see the future is astounding.
why all the hate man, seriously? im going off of just results from this year
moyer has like one good game every 5. he throws junk. that is not going to get good teams like the dodgers out
this isnt meant as a slight to you, just using you as an example. id take you over moyer in a playoff rotation
Posted on 7/24/09 at 6:04 pm to tduecen
quote:
If the Dodgers were willing to part with Clayton Kershaw
You don't trade a 21 year old future Cy Young winner.
Posted on 7/24/09 at 6:05 pm to Ron Mexico
also
the team in really surprised to hear is not inquiring is tampa bay
you know they have the prospects down there, and there were talks of moving kazmir and then jays shipping him to the angels
tampa with
halladay
garza
shields
i like that with their offense
the team in really surprised to hear is not inquiring is tampa bay
you know they have the prospects down there, and there were talks of moving kazmir and then jays shipping him to the angels
tampa with
halladay
garza
shields
i like that with their offense
Posted on 7/24/09 at 6:05 pm to 1ranter1
quote:
You don't trade a 21 year old future Cy Young winner.
I know
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News