- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Halladay likely to Phillies (MLB Network)
Posted on 7/24/09 at 7:24 pm to CM84
Posted on 7/24/09 at 7:24 pm to CM84
quote:
U guranteed a Cy Young and that is what im disputing.
I'll give you that I should have said potential Cy Young winner, because nothing with pitchers is a guarantee.
But if he stays healthy, I would bet money that he wins a Cy Young in his career.
0
Posted on 7/24/09 at 7:24 pm to CM84
quote:
21 year old Kershaw > 21 year old Lincecum.
You keep bringin up the Lincecum vs Kershaw argument..What is your point..Thats great hes better than the 21 yr old version of Lincecum..Now what are trying to prove with that? Your makin an irrelevant argument.
Posted on 7/24/09 at 7:27 pm to CM84
quote:
I'll give you that I should have said potential Cy Young winner, because nothing with pitchers is a guarantee.
Thats all u had to say..But The whole 21 Kershaw vs 21 Lincecum is garbage and irrelevant.
Posted on 7/24/09 at 7:27 pm to CM84
How is comparing him to the current Cy Young winner irrelevant to the arguement that he will win a Cy Young?
Posted on 7/24/09 at 7:29 pm to CM84
quote:
But if he stays healthy, I would bet money that he wins a Cy Young in his career
Thats cool...Thats your opinion and he could. Hes got good stuff..Hes a young pitcher that looks to have a promising future but u cant gurantee Cy Youngs.
This post was edited on 7/24/09 at 7:33 pm
Posted on 7/24/09 at 7:32 pm to CM84
quote:
How is comparing him to the current Cy Young winner irrelevant to the arguement that he will win a Cy Young?
Because u said he's better at 21 than Lincecum...That means every pitcher who has made the Majors at 21 was further along than Lincecum...Think about for a second...Its irrelevant. It doesnt mean anything.
Posted on 7/24/09 at 7:32 pm to 1ranter1
quote:
How is comparing him to the current Cy Young winner irrelevant to the arguement that he will win a Cy Young?
because the two things aren't related in any way.
What are you comparing, stuff, age...what?
His career could be 15 years long, he won't be fighting Tim the whole time.
All you have to say is that his potential is based on the fact that he has quality stuff, and is having success at a very young age. Not because Tim Lincecum went to college.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News