- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:32 pm to tigerblood29
quote:
hopefully this is one of them.
Actually it is. I've agreed with him on most of the stuff he's written about PSU.
I still want to punch him, though.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:33 pm to fastedLSU
I know...rational lawyer thinking to you is like Kyrptonite to rantards who think with fandom emotion and can't understand why this country affords legal protections once someone is accused of a crime.
But then again, Southern justice does have a miserable history of justice via lynch mob - so the NCAA process might actually seem ethical to you.
Let me ask you this, in all seriousness for those with pitchforks (the ones against anyone asking for the slightest bit of evidence and due process)...if Joe Paterno is the monster he's being portrayed...wouldn't you actually like to find out?
But then again, Southern justice does have a miserable history of justice via lynch mob - so the NCAA process might actually seem ethical to you.
Let me ask you this, in all seriousness for those with pitchforks (the ones against anyone asking for the slightest bit of evidence and due process)...if Joe Paterno is the monster he's being portrayed...wouldn't you actually like to find out?
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:34 pm to beatbammer
I think Scott Paterno is hiding the Joe Pa statute under his polo shirt.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:38 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
Not only is there nothing wrong with this...it should be followed in any case...let alone a case of this magnitude.
But everyone just wants it swiftly dealt with because extraordinary circumstances involving sensitive and deeply emotional crimes need not be thorough - just swift.
It looks bad that it's the Paterno family doing this but they shouldn't have had to...we have yet to hear in court from the two people indicted - and yet the NCAA decision becomes final. A decision which is precisely hinged upon what those indicted (and Paterno) did or did not do - not what Sandusky did or what was revealed in his trial.
The NCAA should at least await testified facts and not merely a report by one group without testimony or sworn statements upon which a judgment call was made by one person.
I'm not sure your rights to an appeal apply to NCAA actions. But then again, I haven't taken NCAA Civil Procedure yet...
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:45 pm to Zamoro10
Yeah you suck. Rational lawyer thinking tells me that the umpteen boys that testified is enough evidence for me. When more comes out Jay might need pro bono services from his brother.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:01 pm to fastedLSU
quote:
Yeah you suck. Rational lawyer thinking tells me that the umpteen boys that testified is enough evidence for me. When more comes out Jay might need pro bono services from his brother.
I'm obviously talking to a teenager or someone not that educated.
Once again (as previously posted) the evidence of the Sandusky trial is not what the sanctions are about. Otherwise you are sanctioning them because a criminal committed crimes. And once again...you prove that your think justice is about the emotion of Jerry Sandusky's crimes...this is not the case.
Forget it...just go watch butterflies or something.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:05 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
I'm not sure your rights to an appeal apply to NCAA actions. But then again, I haven't taken NCAA Civil Procedure yet...
You should.
Oh, but then again made up classes would not apply...since I never said the Paterno family has a right to appeal a decision accepted by the University...simply that what the Paterno's said in their released paragraph I highlighted was the truth in how this was handled and adjudged by the public and the NCAA. For such an enormous case rife with emotion, the process deserved more than lip service and rubber-stamping one man's report.
This post was edited on 8/3/12 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:22 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
For such an enormous case rife with emotion, the process deserved more than lip service and rubber-stamping one man's report.
Then Jay Paterno should be bitching at Penn State for signing off on the penalties to begin with.
They never HAD to accept it. They might not have wanted to because of fear of what else the NCAA could find, but they didn't have to accept anything if they were that worried about the "lack of due process".
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:31 pm to Zamoro10
The university accepted the penalties as they should have.
Nobody got railroaded here,as you're implying.
This is just the remainder of a morally bankrupt family attempting to salvage the reputation of a piece of shite.
People believed for a long time that Joepa was some sort of exceptional man of character in a culture of cheaters and rule benders,we now know better.
Swift judgement isn't always incorrect.
Nobody got railroaded here,as you're implying.
This is just the remainder of a morally bankrupt family attempting to salvage the reputation of a piece of shite.
People believed for a long time that Joepa was some sort of exceptional man of character in a culture of cheaters and rule benders,we now know better.
Swift judgement isn't always incorrect.
This post was edited on 8/3/12 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:31 pm to Zamoro10
quote:
I know...rational lawyer thinking to you is like Kyrptonite to rantards who think with fandom emotion and can't understand why this country affords legal protections once someone is accused of a crime.
Stop trying to pass yourself off as a legal scholar when you have no idea what due process is or when it is required.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:33 pm to PowerTool
quote:this
you have no idea what due process is or when it is required
You're not afforded due process in the court of public opinion,or by the NCAA.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:33 pm to Zamoro10
So if sweet ole grampa joe was said to be in the clear, you'd still be arguing against the lip service and stamp process?
This post was edited on 8/3/12 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:33 pm to Cash
quote:
He went to law school, and may have even passed he bar. However, I get the impression he pretty much just mooched off of Joe.
A buddy of mine knows him. They were in the same fantasy football league. My buddy said things got mighty quiet on the league message boards last fall when all this stuff went down. Said it was really awkward for everybody.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:41 pm to bobbyray21
quote:I would imagine
Said it was really awkward for everybody.
Posted on 8/4/12 at 12:02 am to Zamoro10
quote:
Not only is there nothing wrong with this...it should be followed in any case...let alone a case of this magnitude.
But everyone just wants it swiftly dealt with because extraordinary circumstances involving sensitive and deeply emotional crimes need not be thorough - just swift.
It looks bad that it's the Paterno family doing this but they shouldn't have had to...we have yet to hear in court from the two people indicted - and yet the NCAA decision becomes final. A decision which is precisely hinged upon what those indicted (and Paterno) did or did not do - not what Sandusky did or what was revealed in his trial.
The NCAA should at least await testified facts and not merely a report by one group without testimony or sworn statements upon which a judgment call was made by one person.
1. I agree with your general point here. The NCAA knows that nobody feels sorry for Penn State, and that they can basically do whatever the frick they want without repercussion. The NCAA can't operate in an arbitrary and capricious manner and without any fear of repercussion from any sort of overseeing body. I mean, they can legally. But it's just bad policy. There is a reason that procedures exist in all facets of life. It isn't for kicks and giggles. The NCAA followed zero procedures. They took the procedure portion of their own book and they yanked all those pages out and wiped their arse with them. For this and other reasons, I can't condone the actions taken by the NCAA and the manner in which they took them.
2. That said, there is another legal concept in play here called 'standing'. The Paterno family doesn't have it. Their letter to the NCAA had as much chance of achieving its desired effect as my letter to Emma Watson respectfully requesting some reverse cowgirl action. As such, they are doing nothing but making themselves look bad. They should shut the frick up. And Scott should go on a diet. He is fatter than shite.
Posted on 8/4/12 at 1:15 am to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
Zamoro10
quote:
You suck in every thread
quote:
I second this motion
Third
Posted on 8/4/12 at 1:30 am to Tiger1242
quote:
Zamoro10
quote:
You suck in every thread
quote:
I second this motion
quote:
Third
I also vote Yea to this motion
Posted on 8/4/12 at 1:38 am to genro
Yeah, nobody got railroaded here. PSU comissioned the Freeh report. NCAA used the report provided by PSU to justify the sanctions. Sometimes the truth hurts.
Sorry.
Sorry.
Popular
Back to top


1







