- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ESPN's 2016-17 NBA Western Conference predictions. What are your predictions?
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:39 pm to JB Mac
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:39 pm to JB Mac
quote:
I dont see anyone beating the Spurs in the west. They are on another level this year and seemed more determined.
I need to see how we gel or don't during/after the Rodeo Road Trip. Seen some flashes of good things, as well as some major inconsistencies. The record's good, but could be better. Just a lot of new pieces being integrated, especially on that bench.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 10:44 pm to TbirdSpur2010
How about that dude scoring 21 points tonight who averaged 2.3 ppg. Berat?

Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:08 pm to tiggerthetooth
Davis B3rtans
Kid's a fricking shooter and an underrated defender. He won't score 21 every night but if you let him get comfortable out there he'll make defenses pay for sleeping.
Kid's a fricking shooter and an underrated defender. He won't score 21 every night but if you let him get comfortable out there he'll make defenses pay for sleeping.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:50 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Only team the Spurs should be worried about is LAC. The Warriors are horrid down low, and no one else in the conference plays defense.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:55 pm to jefffan
Clips are a bad, bad matchup. Austin Rivers' eyes light up whenever he gets Mills on him, and to be honest, Pop has never really had a defensive answer for CP3. He just carves us up. Throw in the fact that the Clipper bigs like to play more physically than ours and Jamal Crawford's ridiculously effective streetballing, and that's just not a matchup I'd be confident in.
If we do make it to face GSW, I think we hold our own.
If we do make it to face GSW, I think we hold our own.
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 11:56 pm
Posted on 1/8/17 at 1:37 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:He also won't continue to shoot 49% on the road, so settling in around 40% is probably right around where it will end up.
And he hasn't even shite that well at home. He said at home he'd been rushing his shots more and he's focused on being a little more controlled and he's shooting a little better at home now.
So his percentage could go up.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 10:38 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
I mean, the Rockets did get better on paper.
1. If you watched them last year, you would know Dwight was a non-factor. He wasn't good on defense last year (or offense for that matter).
Capela was better than Dwight this past season both statistically and you could see it watching the games. Not-to-mention Dwight was a root cause of chemistry problems.
In case you don't believe that Dwight wasn't the best fit, the Rockets had a record without Dwight over the past 2 seasons of 34-18 (.653). With Dwight, they had a record of 63-49 (.562).
They actually played better when he didn't play. So addition by subtraction.
2. One of the problems with the Rockets on offense (even though their offense has been good since Harden joined the team), was that they shoot a lot of 3's but are only average at best at making them. Their 3 point percentage has been middle of the pack.
Well, by adding Anderson and Gordon, they have added two guys who can really shoot the 3 and space the floor. Harden with better shooters around him to space the floor even more will make him an even better scorer.
Mike D'Antoni has a lot of weapons with Capela being a very good roll man in his pick and roll offense with Harden handling the ball and 40% 3-point shooters spacing the floor.
They really could have one of the best offenses in the league.
In addition to Anderson and Gordon, they added Nene as a back-up center. He's getting up there in age, but is still a solid player.
3. Their defense is the question mark. They were pretty bad on defense last season and still finished with a .500 record. So even if they just maintained their 21st ranked defense from last season, they'd improve by being much better on offense.
If you believe that being better on offense can improve the defense by getting more chances to set up in the half-court after made buckets, then they may improve a bit.
And maybe they surprise people and have an average defense ranked about 13th or 14th.
Who knows. But they certainly improved.
Seriously, going back and reading these predictions is fun.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 10:41 pm to PrimeTime Money
I'm gonna be really really close to nailing this:
GSW
SAS
LAC
CC
MEM
PDX
UTA
OKC
-----
DAL
MIN
DEN
NOP
SAC
PHX
LAL
PDX is the only one that I can say I missed on.
GSW
SAS
LAC
CC
MEM
PDX
UTA
OKC
-----
DAL
MIN
DEN
NOP
SAC
PHX
LAL
PDX is the only one that I can say I missed on.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 10:47 pm to Boomshockalocka
Yeah with my predictions I even said on one of the first few pages how I thought Portland was being completely overrated by people.
I think I ranked them at 6 or 7.
Even I, who thought they were being overrated, didn't see them being THIS bad.
I think I ranked them at 6 or 7.
Even I, who thought they were being overrated, didn't see them being THIS bad.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 10:48 pm to PrimeTime Money
Yea I was down on them too but wasn't expecting this much of a drop off. I'd say they're my favourite atm to get the 8 though.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 10:52 pm to PrimeTime Money
We're fighting for 8 fwiw.
Not that far off
Not that far off
Posted on 3/5/17 at 10:56 pm to Boomshockalocka
I'm surprised you had MEM so high
This post was edited on 3/5/17 at 10:57 pm
Posted on 3/5/17 at 11:04 pm to theducks
Why? Typically they are a good regular season team. They win a lot of games with effort.
Posted on 3/5/17 at 11:30 pm to Boomshockalocka
This is purely based on the rodeo trip going well. If it doesn't go ahead and swap gsw with sas
1. SAS
2. GSW
3. HOU
4. LAC
5. UTA
6. OKC
7. MEM
8. PDX
------
9. DEN
10. NO
11. DAL
12. MIN
13. SAC
14. PHX
15. LAL
1. SAS
2. GSW
3. HOU
4. LAC
5. UTA
6. OKC
7. MEM
8. PDX
------
9. DEN
10. NO
11. DAL
12. MIN
13. SAC
14. PHX
15. LAL
Popular
Back to top


1







