Started By
Message

re: Dolphins potentially listening to trade offers for Jarvis Landry?

Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:01 pm to
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64978 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

I can't believe you are really arguing that athleticism cannot be measured. When every player going into the NFL runs through the same exact drills year after year, you have a sample size of metrics, ran over the same distances with the same exact variables.

I'm asking you to provide what metric you're using. You keep dodging the question. Just answer it
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111101 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

I'm at least arguing based on measurable production

There is data to argue top 10 WRs, there is just as much data to argue which athletes are more athletic than others.

No difference.

Because you don't see something in a boxscore or stats page on ESPN does not mean there's any less data to measure it.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64978 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

But he's all about the top 10 WR "measurable"

No I'm about his production has been top 10 in yards and reception and top 15 in ypc. So yes, based on those numbers he is not outside the top 25.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278603 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:02 pm to
very basic example

5'11"
205
4.77 40yd
28.5" vert
09'02" broad jump
7.56 3 cone



6'0"
209
4.42 40
36 vert
10'05" broad jump
7.01 3 cone



Both of these guys play the same position. They are nearly identical in size. Are you telling me you cannot sit there and determine who the better athlete is? There is nothing subjective about it
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64978 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Because you don't see something in a boxscore or stats page on ESPN does not mean there's any less data to measure it.

Show me any list, subjective or otherwise, that has Landry outside the top 25 in the NFL.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278603 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

I'm asking you to provide what metric you're using. You keep dodging the question. Just answer it




I thought it was clear that they use combine numbers. Same drills, same turf, same watches year after year.

Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64978 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Both of these guys play the same position. They are nearly identical in size. Are you telling me you cannot sit there and determine who the better athlete is? There is nothing subjective about it



Ok, you're making steps to answer a direct question. Now show me the list where Landry is in the 9th percentile of WRs

The funny thing is Landry is viewed as a top 10-15 WR by his peers, coaches, and the fans. He will be paid like one. He produces like one. Yet your stance is he isn't one because of his combine numbers. Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds?
This post was edited on 8/29/17 at 7:09 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278603 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:08 pm to
I'll show you when you acknowledge that you are 100% wrong how bout dat
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64978 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

I'll show you when you acknowledge that you are 100% wrong how bout dat

Wrong about what?
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278603 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:09 pm to
Athleticism not being measurable
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111101 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

Ok, you're making steps to answer a direct question. Now show me the list where Landry is in the 9th percentile of WRs


LINK

This post was edited on 8/29/17 at 7:11 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64978 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Athleticism not being measurable

it's not.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158779 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

The funny thing is Landry is viewed as a top 10-15 WR by his peers,


WAT
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64978 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

WAT

The NFL's top 100 players, voted on by the players, had Landry as the 42nd overall player and 7th among WRs
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112359 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

Athleticism not being measurable it's not.


Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:17 pm to
That list is a joke.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64978 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

That list is a joke.

It's voted on by his peers no?
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:19 pm to
I have no idea. All I know is that Peyton Manning was voted as the 3rd best QB in 2015. No one takes that list seriously.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111101 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

it's not
But top 10 WR is
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64978 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

I have no idea. All I know is that Peyton Manning was voted as the 3rd best QB in 2015. No one takes that list seriously.

Again, I said he is viewed by his peers as a top 10-15 WR. There is a list available where the players vote on the top players in the league. Said list has Landry well within the top 10-15 WRs in the NFL. Therefore, regardless of how you may view the list, saying his peers view him as a top 10-15 WR, based on what we have available to us, is not an untrue statement.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram