- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dolphins potentially listening to trade offers for Jarvis Landry?
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:02 am to shel311
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:02 am to shel311
quote:Dude their are 32 nfl teams.
I think it's fair to conclude based on the stats you use that Tannehill is not below average and Landry does not belong in elite #1 category, what am I missing?
If you are the 10-15th best wide reveiver, you are a "legit #1"
And for Tannehill, I said pages back I would have him right around 16. However, I pointed out he was below average compared to the qbs that throw to the top 15 qbs
1
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:12 am to lsupride87
Players right now who, at the very least, have an argument as being better WRs than Landry, meaning better or in the conversation, if you will:
Nelson
Evans
Adams
Brown
Beckham
Thomas
Dez
Cooks
Baldwin
Hilton
Demaryus Thomas
J Jones
A Cooper
E Sanders
Hopkins
It's arguable that he may be at the start of the bottom half, as opposed to closer to top 10.
ETA: I also wouldn't consider everyone of those legit #1 WRs either.
Nelson
Evans
Adams
Brown
Beckham
Thomas
Dez
Cooks
Baldwin
Hilton
Demaryus Thomas
J Jones
A Cooper
E Sanders
Hopkins
It's arguable that he may be at the start of the bottom half, as opposed to closer to top 10.
ETA: I also wouldn't consider everyone of those legit #1 WRs either.
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 10:22 am
Posted on 8/30/17 at 10:53 am to shel311
quote:Perfect, here are those players with Landry added ranking by average of your 5 categories used earlier (Rec, yards, yds/game, tds, YPC), and median of your 5 categories
Players right now who, at the very least, have an argument as being better WRs than Landry, meaning better or in the conversation, if you will:
Nelson
Evans
Adams
Brown
Beckham
Thomas
Dez
Cooks
Baldwin
Hilton
Demaryus Thomas
J Jones
A Cooper
E Sanders
Hopkins
So I think ranking Landry the 10th best receiver is certainly very very reasonable. And I would say being the 10th best in a 32 team league would make you a legit #1
Posted on 8/30/17 at 11:05 am to lsupride87
quote:Not so fast.
So I think ranking Landry the 10th best receiver is certainly very very reasonable. And I would say being the 10th best in a 32 team league would make you a legit #1
You were using the "below average" moniker to point out that Tannehill was holding Landry back, right?
No adjustments for Sanders/Thomas/Hopkins based on your same logic? Or only Landry gets to use that argument?
And even with Dez, he obviously didn't have a deficient QB but with a rookie, they played everything as safe as possible and completely nuked Dez's skill set, I'm sure you'd agree. So you should factor that in as well.
I just wonder how you account for that, or why you wouldn't account for that, when this entire thing started because you called Tannehill below average, and that was affecting Landry's numbers
Posted on 8/30/17 at 11:14 am to shel311
quote:Absolutely they would also be helped with better QB play as well. Never have even remotely hinted otherwise
You were using the "below average" moniker to point out that Tannehill was holding Landry back, right?
No adjustments for Sanders/Thomas/Hopkins based on your same logic? Or only Landry gets to use that argument?
This post was edited on 8/30/17 at 11:20 am
Posted on 8/30/17 at 11:16 am to lsupride87
quote:So it can at least be argued that they have an argument to be ahead of Landry based on bad Peyton and let's not even talk about the Texans QB situation.
Absolutely they would also be helped with better QB play as well
Posted on 8/30/17 at 11:20 am to shel311
quote:Sure, but then Landry would have an argument to jump some people ahead of him as well....
So it can at least be argued that they have an argument to be ahead of Landry based on bad Peyton and let's not even talk about the Texans QB situati
Posted on 8/30/17 at 11:23 am to lsupride87
quote:I'll give you Jordy!
Sure, but then Landry would have an argument to jump some people ahead of him as well....
Posted on 8/30/17 at 11:37 am to shel311
Here are there rankings by their QBs average in (Completion %, yds/g, td%, int%, rating)
One thing I noticed, Oz sucks, and Eli is sooooooooooooooooooooo overrated
One thing I noticed, Oz sucks, and Eli is sooooooooooooooooooooo overrated
Posted on 8/30/17 at 11:43 am to lsupride87
quote:Stolen take from LeBatard, but everyone gives Ben McAdoo credit as the QB whisperer, like it's some coincidence that Eli saw an uptick the moment Beckham bursted on the scene.
Eli is sooooooooooooooooooooo overrated
Posted on 8/30/17 at 11:46 am to shel311
Y'all just need to consolidate the two threads y'all are arguing in.
Need a thunder dome thread
Need a thunder dome thread
Posted on 8/30/17 at 11:50 am to wildtigercat93
quote:Pride and I are arguing in 2 threads?
Y'all just need to consolidate the two threads y'all are arguing in.
I don't think so. But we are having 2 distinctly different arguments in this thread.
But it appears to be mostly dead now, so carry on!!!
Posted on 8/30/17 at 11:51 am to shel311
Thought he was in the stafford thread
Well throw goldrush in there and make it a devils threeway.
Well throw goldrush in there and make it a devils threeway.
Page 12 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News