
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you really believe the SEC would kick LSU out? MSB edition
Posted on 9/9/26 at 4:29 pm to Adam Banks
Posted on 9/9/26 at 4:29 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
All it takes is the next coach and AD willing to push.
South Carolina literally has a player from the same TRO on their roster RIGHT NOW
Posted on 9/9/26 at 4:32 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
The SEC was going to likely lose the federal court case and it was going to blow their whole illusion up.
Is that why LSU gave up last night?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 4:43 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
All it takes is one new coach or AD who wants to push.
IMHO that is the whole point of this silly saga...preventing that from ever happening again. LSU/Kiffin just happened to be dabbling in all this as the outrage manifested (despite others having done the same thing), and were then used to prove a point. If a coach/AD wants to push....go ahead, enjoy your search for a new conference, i.e., FAFO
This was about using a sledgehammer to break a dry noodle just to remind everyone who had the sledgehammer. All these dumb TROs might just magically go away now. For a few days anyway.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 4:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
LSU has said the entire time they will comply as much as I personally didn’t want them to. They didn’t want to risk down the road negative blow back from the CFP. I don’t think they care about Sankey hence why rouse said have your vote.
The SEC backed off a lawsuit that per yourself was existential. If was do necessary and applicable for later cases why back off? Did Kiffins comments somehow get erased?
Did his “collusion with lawyers” still not happen?
You literally said this morning “it didn’t matter that LSU bent the knee”
These are YOUR arguments.
The SEC backed off a lawsuit that per yourself was existential. If was do necessary and applicable for later cases why back off? Did Kiffins comments somehow get erased?
Did his “collusion with lawyers” still not happen?
You literally said this morning “it didn’t matter that LSU bent the knee”
These are YOUR arguments.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 4:54 pm to Hooligan33
quote:
IMHO that is the whole point of this silly saga...preventing that from ever happening again.
I’d buy that if they actually went to court and established precedence that they can but then didn’t expel I’d buy it.
This ultimately didn’t stop that as there’s no formal established precedence of legitimate powers
Sankey got emotional and flailed with his case but backed down with a gesture from LSU but no apology which all leaks yesterday said he wanted.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:15 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
The SEC backed off a lawsuit that per yourself was existential.
The reasoning behind that suit has not been abandoned. If they achieve the same goal via voluntary agreement that's a superior outcome for all.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:15 pm to Hooligan33
quote:
IMHO that is the whole point of this silly saga...preventing that from ever happening again. LSU/Kiffin just happened to be dabbling in all this as the outrage manifested (despite others having done the same thing), and were then used to prove a point. If a coach/AD wants to push....go ahead, enjoy your search for a new conference, i.e., FAFO
This was about using a sledgehammer to break a dry noodle just to remind everyone who had the sledgehammer. All these dumb TROs might just magically go away now. For a few days anyway.
Correck
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:26 pm to Hooligan33
Charles Bediako, say his name!!
Posted on 9/9/26 at 7:56 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
I’d buy that if they actually went to court and established precedence that they can but then didn’t expel I’d buy it.
This whole thing was to show that they didnt have to go to court to have the muscle. The conference sets the rules, dare to go against them and you could be out regardless of some random judge's decision. That is why it went from zero to "we are voting to kick you out" in 5 seconds. Nip it in the bud and show who is in control.
Note how quickly Texas Tech shut its mouth about Sorsby once the conference united against them. Not the same scenario by any means, but the hand that feeds usually doesnt lose.

Popular
Back to top

0








