- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dark horse to win Masters?
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:18 pm to footballtimeintn
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:18 pm to footballtimeintn
K.J. Choi is an excellent choice. Whoever picked Sergio made a horrible choice. I think Lee Westwood can make some noise, and I see Zach Johnson being near the top of the leaderboard the entire weekend.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:18 pm to hehateme2285
quote:
Bo Van Pelt
This is actually a really solid pick. Hes done really well at the masters
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:22 pm to lsusportsman2
quote:
K.J. Choi is an excellent choice. Whoever picked Sergio made a horrible choice. I think Lee Westwood can make some noise, and I see Zach Johnson being near the top of the leaderboard the entire weekend.
K.J. has only 2 top 25 finishes in his career at Augusta
Westwood I can agree with, if he putts well, which is always his Achilles heal
Zach Johnson has gone T20, Cut, 42, Cut, T32 since his win.
ETA: I like Jason Day
This post was edited on 4/10/13 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:23 pm to JJ27
quote:
A lot of top 20 guys being picked. What would be considered a dark horse?
I'd say anyone that has worse than 40/1 or maybe 50/1 odds.. which eliminates several of the aforementioned players.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:25 pm to lsusportsman2
quote:
K.J. Choi is an excellent choice. Whoever picked Sergio made a horrible choice.
Ha. These two guys are the definition of a dark horse for this tournament. Please explain how Sergio is a horrible "choice." Do you know what a dark horse is?
quote:
I think Lee Westwood can make some noise
No. You don't.
This post was edited on 4/10/13 at 5:26 pm
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:30 pm to PhiTiger1764
The whole definition of a "darkhouse" is debatable, I guess there aren't any bad picks, other than people who are already major winners or in the top 25 of the world.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:37 pm to PhiTiger1764
Sergio hasn't done shite in majors recently, especially last year. His best finish in the Masters in the past 10 years was last year when he finished 12th. You're kidding yourself if you think he has any chance at all.
This post was edited on 4/10/13 at 5:42 pm
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:45 pm to footballtimeintn
Dark horse? I like Keegan or Mahan. Not sure either one would fully be considered a dark horse but why not.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:45 pm to footballtimeintn
Bill Haas (70/1) - A bunch of top 10s this year
Richard Sterne (100/1) - Won J'Berg Open at -27 this year, 7 shots ahead of Schwartzel
Richard Sterne (100/1) - Won J'Berg Open at -27 this year, 7 shots ahead of Schwartzel
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:47 pm to lsusportsman2
What is your definition of dark horse? Anyone but Tiger?
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:48 pm to Billy Mays
quote:
Bill Haas (70/1) - A bunch of top 10s this year Richard Sterne (100/1) - Won J'Berg Open at -27 this year, 7 shots ahead of Schwartzel
This guy gets it. Some good Dark horses here
Posted on 4/10/13 at 5:51 pm to PhiTiger1764
quote:
Yea huge dark horse
Well, he is dark after all.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 6:09 pm to PhiTiger1764
I'm not sure I'd consider Bill Haas a darkhorse, dude won the Fedex cup 2 years ago
ETA: The other guy, definitely a darkhorse
ETA: The other guy, definitely a darkhorse
This post was edited on 4/10/13 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 4/10/13 at 6:12 pm to Muahahaha
I took a prop that DJ would win. Poulter being 1st round leader and McDowell being top European.
Posted on 4/10/13 at 6:14 pm to Muahahaha
quote:
Justin Rose
I'm gonna say the #3 player in the world is not a darkhorse
Popular
Back to top


2






