- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:12 pm to LSUBoo
he could take the year off and then retire next year and id vote for him
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:13 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
he could take the year off and then retire next year and id vote for him
He wouldn't be on the ballot for anyone to vote for him.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:14 pm to LSUBoo
he can play in the absolute bare minimum amount of games needed to qualify to be on the ballot and then immediately retire and id still vote for him even if he was a net negative player between now and then
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:16 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
he can play in the absolute bare minimum amount of games needed to qualify to be on the ballot and then immediately retire and id still vote for him even if he was a net negative player between now and then
Fair enough, but if he did that he would be one and done.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:18 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
he can play in the absolute bare minimum amount of games needed to qualify to be on the ballot and then immediately retire and id still vote for him even if he was a net negative player between now and then
Would you vote for Andrew McCutchen?
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:18 pm to sorantable
suprised no mention of machado yet. He should have more than 50 WAR by the end of the season and he isnt even 30 yet.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:21 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
mookie is pretty safely over the average peak war threshold right now
mccutchen isnt and isnt really close
mccutchen isnt and isnt really close
This post was edited on 8/12/22 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:23 pm to diremustang
How in the frick has Salvador Perez not been mentioned?
7x All Star
World Series MVP
Most HRs ever for a catcher
Shame on each and every 1 of you
7x All Star
World Series MVP
Most HRs ever for a catcher
Shame on each and every 1 of you
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:25 pm to WestCoastAg
That’s nice. Their careers through age 29 are still very similar
Regardless if Betts did what you say he would have zero chance of getting in
Regardless if Betts did what you say he would have zero chance of getting in
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:27 pm to WestCoastAg
Mookie is easily on a HOF pace, but that doesn't mean he's 100% in.
The only people that are 100% in are the ones that are in the no doubt category if they retired today.
Mookie isn't there yet. Neither was Pujols or Miggy at age 29. And their age 29 stats dwarf Betts.
The only people that are 100% in are the ones that are in the no doubt category if they retired today.
Mookie isn't there yet. Neither was Pujols or Miggy at age 29. And their age 29 stats dwarf Betts.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:28 pm to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
Most HRs ever for a catcher
Nope
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:29 pm to Rickdaddy4188
He must have meant single season.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:29 pm to sorantable
Kershaw, Altuve, verlander, Cabrera, judge, Freeman, wainwright, Molina, Soto,
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:31 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:54 WAR vs 37.And with McCutchen having played in 130 more games. They are basically the same player offensively, but Betts is miles ahead on defense
That’s nice. Their careers through age 29 are still very similar
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:32 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:hes worth over 2 WAR more than mccutchen through his 9th season. and hes on pace to add another 2 WAR by the end of the year. and thats with the 60 game covid season
Their careers through age 29 are still very similar
quote:i was speaking in hyperbole to make a point about how i would already vote for mookie based on the career he has had to date. he obviously cannot fall off a cliff and become a net negative player for any extended period of time and hope to get in
if Betts did what you say he would have zero chance of getting in
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:34 pm to Klingler7
quote:
Kershaw, Altuve, verlander, Cabrera, judge, Freeman, wainwright, Molina, Soto,
A) You missed the most obvious one.
B) Pump the brakes on Soto.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:34 pm to sorantable
quote:
Current MLB players who will 100% be in the HOF
This is a much smaller list than some answers in this thread will indicate. Barring some off field stuff, I believe these are the current locks. I'm sure I'm forgetting one or two guys as well.
Pujols
Cabrera
Scherzer
Kershaw
Verlander
Trout
deGrom (don't care about his low win total)
Yadi (
) Again, I'm sure I'm missing one or two guys, but it really doesn't seem like a much longer list than this.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:36 pm to VADawg
quote:
deGrom (don't care about his low win total)
Like Betts, he isn't eligible yet. Far from a lock although I would bet on both in the long run.
Posted on 8/12/22 at 9:42 pm to diremustang
McCutchen gets hit pretty hard on the defensive metrics because he played a bad center instead of playing in a corner like Betts. Defensive metrics 8-10 years ago were pretty bad also. I’m guessing BR is just using UZR
Regardless it’s dumb hypothetical. Andruw was better than Betts and did basically what he’s describing and can’t get in
Regardless it’s dumb hypothetical. Andruw was better than Betts and did basically what he’s describing and can’t get in
This post was edited on 8/12/22 at 9:43 pm
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News