Started By
Message

re: Cubs win lawsuit against rooftop seating

Posted on 10/13/26 at 5:15 am to
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
19063 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 5:15 am to
quote:

I get why the cubs want money, but I don’t see how you can charge someone to watch your open product from their own private property?
MSB is the best in the business but it’s wild to have this many people confused. You guys are arguing against made up positions

At no point have the Cubs argued people can’t watch the game for free from private property, nor is there a question as to if they have legal standing there to stop it. They don’t

The lawsuit was entirely that this guy doesn’t have a right to sell $100-300 tickets to freeload off of the product they create, and it’s a pretty cut and dry example of misappropriation
This post was edited on 10/13/26 at 5:19 am
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
56063 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 5:27 am to
quote:

The lawsuit was entirely that this guy doesn’t have a right to sell $100-300 tickets to freeload off of the product they create,


He does if he’s not on Cubs property
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
4677 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:30 am to
Does the Cubs organization prohibit private property owners from charging to use their own property for paid parking?
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
19063 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 6:35 am to
quote:

He does if he’s not on Cubs property
Well you can join the guy’s legal team on appeal and tell the judge why she’s wrong
This post was edited on 10/13/26 at 6:36 am
Posted by Hubbhogg
Our AD Sucks
Member since Dec 2010
13562 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 7:36 am to
He makes huge profits. My brother went to a world series game the year they won it, and I believe he payed upwards of $500 to sit up there. Obvisouly that's a world series game, but I'm sure it's not cheap on normal game situation either.
Posted by Flaming Meons
Member since Aug 2026
539 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 4:40 pm to
Was he specifically charging a fee to “watch the game” or were people just at a bar that overlooks the stadium?
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24764 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Does the Cubs organization prohibit private property owners from charging to use their own property for paid parking?


Interesting counterpoint. Cubs can’t have a game without outside vendors providing transportation and parking

ETA: do the cubs owe them money in order to host?
This post was edited on 10/14/26 at 4:53 pm
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17753 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

It's no different than every stadium in the world covering any opening of people being able to see inside the stadium from the outside.


Well not every stadium does that.

LINK
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
9701 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 7:18 pm to
Ridiculous ruling. This is private property outside the stadium.
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
15216 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 8:59 pm to
Sell them a pencil and rubber band for the estimated ticket price and the guest get to watch for free with complimentary food.
Posted by Bigdawgb
Member since Oct 2023
5104 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

The Cubs own the content and they can charge what they want. He can choose to pay it or not. Sucks for the roof guy but that's business.


Dude is sitting on a privately owned roof in view of a public sporting event. How are you legislating this, seriously?? It's a good court case imo
Posted by theballguy
A negabama in HSV
Member since Oct 2011
45738 posts
Posted on 10/14/26 at 10:06 pm to
A lot of lawyers on these boards
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram