Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Could CFB just do player contracts instead of scholarships to avoid this portal mess?

Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:13 pm
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
85317 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:13 pm
Seems like a simple solution since it has basically turned into a pay to play sport.

The players aren’t amateurs. They are professionals at this point, so get rid of the scholarships and offer multi year contracts instead. Fully guaranteed ones.

Time to officially make major CFB a minor league sport. No way will this ever be fixed to make it like it use to be. That train has left the station and it’s never coming back.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
37770 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:17 pm to
The schools don't want the players to be employees
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
85317 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:18 pm to
They also don’t want them transferring at will either.

So if they want it to change, they are gonna have to give up something

Court after court has backed the players.
Posted by 615tider
sidewalk in TN
Member since Oct 2012
3585 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

player contracts


Coaches have contracts and leave which causes all sorts of problems.

Players would most definitely end up with the same situation.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
22953 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

Coaches have contracts and leave which causes all sorts of problems.


WTF? They can't leave prior to a contract's end without major penalties.

Would be perfect for players. If another school wants them, pay their buyout first.
Posted by Slinger16
Not Louisiana
Member since Jun 2007
21884 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 5:24 pm to
Wouldn't schools be able to trade players if they were under contract?
Posted by McVick
Member since Jan 2011
4571 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

The players aren’t amateurs. They are professionals at this point, so get rid of the scholarships and offer multi year contracts instead.


Would the university have the right to terminate the contract and fire the player before they have the opportunity to complete their academic studies? Will this only be for football players or apply to all students athletes?
Posted by Mister Flawless
Tuscaloosa
Member since Jul 2011
393 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 7:08 pm to
quote:

Would the university have the right to terminate the contract and fire the player before they have the opportunity to complete their academic studies? Will this only be for football players or apply to all students athletes?


I’ll bite on this “gotcha.” Before we even get into the contract issue, can a student-athlete be kicked off the team for misconduct unbecoming, whether that’s not listening to a coach, not making grades, or doing anything criminal?

We know that’s true even if the student is on scholarship. Once they are kicked off their team, the student may still be enrolled in the school and could complete their studies. However the university has separate rules related to student misconduct that must be followed.

Now, for the contracts. Getting this out of the way, universities receive federal funding, meaning they have to follow Title IX. Thus, you have contracts for football, you have to do it for all. The settlement and revenue sharing will be expanded to all athletics, not just football.

Finally, the athletes should be considered employees since they meet the rules for employment sans payment for services rendered. It would make things so much easier if there was employment, but schools want to avoid it due to the threat of workers compensation claims. That alone would cost more than any revenue sharing.

Ultimately, there will be some collective bargaining but it will be strange without employment. It may be more akin to the actors union than anything, but you will see multi-year and single year deals throughout. That CBA would also layout penalties for athletes doing improper things and how school will also factor.

Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
23818 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

Coaches have contracts and leave which causes all sorts of problems.

Players would most definitely end up with the same situation.
Coaches leaving for another job means the coach or new school has to pay the old school to buyout the contract. Why wouldn’t the same apply to players?
Posted by GoGators1995
Member since Jan 2023
4519 posts
Posted on 1/9/25 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

The schools don't want the players to be employees

Couldn't they still sign them to contracts and classify them as independent contractors like WWE still gets away with?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram