- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Could CFB just do player contracts instead of scholarships to avoid this portal mess?
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:13 pm
Seems like a simple solution since it has basically turned into a pay to play sport.
The players aren’t amateurs. They are professionals at this point, so get rid of the scholarships and offer multi year contracts instead. Fully guaranteed ones.
Time to officially make major CFB a minor league sport. No way will this ever be fixed to make it like it use to be. That train has left the station and it’s never coming back.
The players aren’t amateurs. They are professionals at this point, so get rid of the scholarships and offer multi year contracts instead. Fully guaranteed ones.
Time to officially make major CFB a minor league sport. No way will this ever be fixed to make it like it use to be. That train has left the station and it’s never coming back.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:17 pm to SPEEDY
The schools don't want the players to be employees
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:18 pm to usc6158
They also don’t want them transferring at will either.
So if they want it to change, they are gonna have to give up something
Court after court has backed the players.
So if they want it to change, they are gonna have to give up something
Court after court has backed the players.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:35 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
player contracts
Coaches have contracts and leave which causes all sorts of problems.
Players would most definitely end up with the same situation.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 4:47 pm to 615tider
quote:
Coaches have contracts and leave which causes all sorts of problems.
WTF? They can't leave prior to a contract's end without major penalties.
Would be perfect for players. If another school wants them, pay their buyout first.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 5:24 pm to SPEEDY
Wouldn't schools be able to trade players if they were under contract?
Posted on 1/9/25 at 5:25 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
The players aren’t amateurs. They are professionals at this point, so get rid of the scholarships and offer multi year contracts instead.
Would the university have the right to terminate the contract and fire the player before they have the opportunity to complete their academic studies? Will this only be for football players or apply to all students athletes?
Posted on 1/9/25 at 7:08 pm to McVick
quote:
Would the university have the right to terminate the contract and fire the player before they have the opportunity to complete their academic studies? Will this only be for football players or apply to all students athletes?
I’ll bite on this “gotcha.” Before we even get into the contract issue, can a student-athlete be kicked off the team for misconduct unbecoming, whether that’s not listening to a coach, not making grades, or doing anything criminal?
We know that’s true even if the student is on scholarship. Once they are kicked off their team, the student may still be enrolled in the school and could complete their studies. However the university has separate rules related to student misconduct that must be followed.
Now, for the contracts. Getting this out of the way, universities receive federal funding, meaning they have to follow Title IX. Thus, you have contracts for football, you have to do it for all. The settlement and revenue sharing will be expanded to all athletics, not just football.
Finally, the athletes should be considered employees since they meet the rules for employment sans payment for services rendered. It would make things so much easier if there was employment, but schools want to avoid it due to the threat of workers compensation claims. That alone would cost more than any revenue sharing.
Ultimately, there will be some collective bargaining but it will be strange without employment. It may be more akin to the actors union than anything, but you will see multi-year and single year deals throughout. That CBA would also layout penalties for athletes doing improper things and how school will also factor.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 7:49 pm to 615tider
quote:Coaches leaving for another job means the coach or new school has to pay the old school to buyout the contract. Why wouldn’t the same apply to players?
Coaches have contracts and leave which causes all sorts of problems.
Players would most definitely end up with the same situation.
Posted on 1/9/25 at 8:20 pm to usc6158
quote:
The schools don't want the players to be employees
Couldn't they still sign them to contracts and classify them as independent contractors like WWE still gets away with?
Popular
Back to top
