- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chris Jones: Penalties 1,000 percent affected the game
Posted on 2/8/21 at 5:10 pm to RobbBobb
Posted on 2/8/21 at 5:10 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Wow, you cant be serious
I have eyeballs so I’m dead serious. Watch the replay and you’ll see their left feet hit and caused them both to fall.
quote:
Breeland shoved Evans, then tried to grab his towel in desperation, to keep Evans from making the catch.
Literally none of this happened.
This post was edited on 2/8/21 at 5:11 pm
1
Posted on 2/8/21 at 5:59 pm to RB10
quote:
Literally none of this happened.
Lol. You said he may not have even touched Evans. So Evans towel just magically got separation from his waist? Without Breeland shoving him? Comical
The broadcast ref even corrected Romo when he started talking about the pass being uncatchable, "It was a foul, Tony"
Posted on 2/8/21 at 6:40 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Lol. You said he may not have even touched Evans. So Evans towel just magically got separation from his waist? Without Breeland shoving him? Comical
A towel was moving while someone was sprinting?!?!? Stop the presses!!!
quote:
The broadcast ref even corrected Romo when he started talking about the pass being uncatchable, "It was a foul, Tony"
He’s wrong too. When a WR and DB inadvertently tangle feet it’s not pass interference.
This post was edited on 2/8/21 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 2/8/21 at 6:42 pm to RLDSC FAN
Nah, penalties wouldn't have overcome Mahones running for his life all night.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 6:43 pm to RB10
Dude, I'm an official, a SJ. So PI is my baby. I watched it happen in real time, Breeland tripped Evans w/his hand. The SJ had perfect position as he was in his backpedal. It was DPI.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 6:45 pm to RB10
quote:
He’s wrong too. When a WR and DB tangle feet it’s not pass interference.
The feet definitely hit first. I think the ref missed that and only saw Breeland’s hand hit Evans foot on the way down. If Evans hadn’t stayed up for an extra step or two, I don’t think it’s called. It’s really easy to see why the ref would think it was PI, especially full speed.
Not saying it was definitively PI or not, but understand the call.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 6:46 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
Dude, I'm an official, a SJ. So PI is my baby.
Lord help those pee wee players.
quote:
I watched it happen in real time, Breeland tripped Evans w/his hand.
Is this better than the slow motion replay that clearly shows them both tripping over Breelands left foot?
quote:
The SJ had perfect position as he was in his backpedal. It was DPI.
He should have seen that it wasn’t PI then. Maybe you need to brush up on the inadvertent tangling of feet caveat to the rule.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 6:56 pm to RB10
quote:
A towel was moving while someone was sprinting
So I just watched the play again, and have come to the conclusion that you're just plain ignorant. The towel in question goes from moving in a back and forth motion to being stretched straight to the ground. In fact stretched far enough down, that you can see the elastic on both ends that attach the towel to the pants.
There is now way that the towel movement changes to a 90 movement, nor for the elastic to be stretched completely out other than by force from another player.
But you continue to buffoon yourself.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 7:00 pm to League Champs
quote:
There is now way that the towel movement changes to a 90 movement, nor for the elastic to be stretched completely out other than by force from another player.
But you continue to buffoon yourself.
If informing all of you that inadvertent tangled feet isn’t PI is “buffooning myself” I guess I will. You poor bastards don’t seem to have a clue.
This post was edited on 2/8/21 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 2/8/21 at 7:12 pm to RB10
quote:
ARTICLE 3. PERMISSIBLE ACTS BY BOTH TEAMS WHILE THE BALL IS IN THE AIR
Acts that are permissible by a player include, but are not limited to: Incidental contact by an opponent’s hands, arms, or body when both players are competing for the ball, or neither player is looking for the ball. If there is any question whether contact is incidental, the ruling shall be no interference.
Inadvertent tangling of feet when both players are playing the ball or neither player is playing the ball.
Straight From the Book
Breeland didn’t grab him or trip him on purpose after their feet tangled. No PI.
I think we’re done here.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 7:24 pm to RB10
quote:
If informing all of you that inadvertent tangled feet isn’t PI is “buffooning myself” I guess I will
The push was well after the tangled feet. That's what makes you a buffoon. The tangled feet was so insignificant that Evans barely missed stride. But after the push Evans went down. You act like Breeland didn't intentionally reach out (with his LEFT hand) and make contact in order to impede Evans on his way to the ground.
lulz
Posted on 2/8/21 at 7:30 pm to RB10
Well frick, I found out your problem. You have no reading comprehension skills. From your own link:
Chiefs DB never had a play on the ball, and Mike had his eyes on the ball until he was knocked down
Pretty much shoots your BS interpretation of the rules down the shitter
Thank God youre finally done here, tho
quote:
Incidental contact by an opponent’s hands, arms, or body when both players are competing for the ball, or neither player is looking for the ball.
quote:
when both players are competing for the ball
quote:
neither player is looking for the ball
Chiefs DB never had a play on the ball, and Mike had his eyes on the ball until he was knocked down
Pretty much shoots your BS interpretation of the rules down the shitter
Thank God youre finally done here, tho
Posted on 2/8/21 at 7:41 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Chiefs DB never had a play on the ball, and Mike had his eyes on the ball until he was knocked down
Pretty much shoots your BS interpretation of the rules down the shitter
Thank God youre finally done here, tho
Bruh nothing Breeland did was intentionally aimed at stopping Evan’s from catching the ball. By their own rules it was a bad call.
Deal with it.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 7:43 pm to League Champs
quote:
You act like Breeland didn't intentionally reach out (with his LEFT hand) and make contact in order to impede Evans on his way to the ground.
Yes I am saying something that didn’t happen, didn’t happen.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 7:49 pm to RB10
quote:
Lord help those pee wee players.
Now the insults are coming.
I officiate high school, including a game at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta 3 years ago moron. I'm gonna toot my own horn here but I've worked my way up to be the #2 SJ in my association.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 8:03 pm to RLDSC FAN
Two of them were absolutely awful, and they contributed to making KC one-dimensional. The hold against Ward on the Mathieu pick and the PI in the EZ - both guarding Evans who was being just as physical
Posted on 2/8/21 at 8:04 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
that was my biggest beef
Tampa Bay had been committing sexual assault in the secondary for 3 rounds in a row and they were officiated differently than KC in the first half of the super bowl
Tampa Bay had been committing sexual assault in the secondary for 3 rounds in a row and they were officiated differently than KC in the first half of the super bowl
Posted on 2/8/21 at 8:09 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
I officiate high school, including a game at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta 3 years ago moron. I'm gonna toot my own horn here but I've worked my way up to be the #2 SJ in my association.
Sweet. May want to brush up on that rule I posted.
Posted on 2/8/21 at 9:24 pm to RB10
quote:
Bruh nothing Breeland did was intentionally aimed at stopping Evan’s from catching the ball. By their own rules it was a bad call.
Who the eff are you responding to? Nothing in my response had to do with intent. The fact that youre bouncing all around with your posts, pretty much proves you are grasping at straws
quote:
By their own rules
I copied for you, word for word the rule that said it can only be incidental IF . . . . neither player was looking for the ball, OR both players were competing for that ball. Breeland was in no way, shape, or form competing for that ball
So try to stick to one point. The rules you yourself posted (need me to highlight that again?) clearly show it wasnt incidental, so . . . .
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News