Started By
Message
locked post

Can we talk about the Oakland Athletics?

Posted on 6/4/13 at 5:52 am
Posted by Bluegrass_Cat
GVL, SC
Member since Aug 2012
1634 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 5:52 am
The Oakland A's, who won the AL West last year, have won 15 of their last 17, and yet get no attention.

I'm not sure why they get no love nationally. All you heard in the off-season was how they are a fluke, got lucky, etc.

I think it's time to accept that Oakland has a hell of a team. And no I don't want this to be like the Indians thread a few weeks ago because they always play good in May and fade.

So what say you MSB...can/will Oakland win the AL West again?
This post was edited on 6/4/13 at 5:53 am
Posted by CunningLinguist
Dallas, TX
Member since Mar 2006
18762 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 6:35 am to
Can they? Yes. Will they? Maybe. It depends on who the Rangers get in a July trade and if the Angels starting pitching can recover.
Posted by tzimme4
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
28364 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 6:40 am to
Josh Reddick has done pretty well for them coming back from the DL
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19307 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 8:09 am to
quote:

So what say you MSB...can/will Oakland win the AL West again?


I picked them to win the division this year and I am still sticking behind my pick.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18981 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 8:44 am to
I said last year after we beat them that they were no fluke and would be contenders this year
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13604 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 8:45 am to
:moneyball2.0:
Posted by Bluegrass_Cat
GVL, SC
Member since Aug 2012
1634 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Can they? Yes. Will they? Maybe. It depends on who the Rangers get in a July trade and if the Angels starting pitching can recover.



Honestly, I'm not even considering the Angels at this point. They just got swept in 4 games by the Astros, and have honestly looked like shite all year long. By this time last year they had somewhat started to turn it around. Their starting pitching is horrible, and probably won't get MUCH better.

For them to get back in the hunt, they're going to have to go on a run much like what the A's are on right now, and frankly I don't see that happening.
Posted by Lion Monticello
Member since Dec 2009
1007 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:26 am to
The A's are the real deal. As a Ranger fan, I have been watching what they were doing closely, although only through box scores and having watched most of the 7 games they have played with the Rangers. It is amazing how few of their players are recognizable outside of maybe CoCo Crisp. THis is probably why they dont get much attention. But dont let that fool you. I believe the Rangers are the better team, but I could definitely see this one being a close race down to the wire. In the end, the Rangers depth will probably be too much for the A's to win the division.

If they were not in the same division, and if they weren't located in God awful Oakland, I could see myself pulling for a team like them. It is amazing how poor their attendance is with a team that is as good as they are.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:27 am to
With that pitching staff, their manager, a well-rounded offense, and the chemistry they seem to have in the clubhouse .. I think they win the AL West by at least 3 or 4 games.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:28 am to
I picked them to win the WS
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:29 am to
quote:

The Oakland A's, who won the AL West last year, have won 15 of their last 17, and yet get no attention

Thats because the sports media was too busy claiming the precious Angels of Anaheim to be back
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:33 am to
quote:

The Oakland A's, who won the AL West last year, have won 15 of their last 17, and yet get no attention
ESPN's telecasts revolve around Boston and New York and Boston and New York only. MLB Network gives all teams love.

That being said, I wish my team was half as good as the A's.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:35 am to
quote:

ESPN's telecasts revolve around Boston and New York and Boston and New York only. MLB Network gives all teams love.



Kevin Millar has been all over Oakland since spring training!
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61117 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:37 am to
quote:

:moneyball2.0:


Id say 3.0 now, last year was 2.0 IMO.
Posted by ColoradoAg03
Denver, CO
Member since Oct 2012
6121 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:37 am to
Astros just swept the Angels And took 3 out of 4 from the Rockies last week. A little momentum for that team could go a long way. I'm not saying the Astros will win the AL West, but they could be a spoiler. Oakland is lookin good though!
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:42 am to
quote:

A little momentum for that team could go a long way. I'm not saying the Astros will win the AL West, but they could be a spoiler.




No.

The Orioles fit this too. Last year labeled a fluke. Even more so when they didn't make any major moves in the offseason. They keep right on chugging.
Posted by Bluegrass_Cat
GVL, SC
Member since Aug 2012
1634 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:49 am to
quote:

The A's are the real deal. As a Ranger fan, I have been watching what they were doing closely, although only through box scores and having watched most of the 7 games they have played with the Rangers. It is amazing how few of their players are recognizable outside of maybe CoCo Crisp. THis is probably why they dont get much attention. But dont let that fool you. I believe the Rangers are the better team, but I could definitely see this one being a close race down to the wire. In the end, the Rangers depth will probably be too much for the A's to win the division.

If they were not in the same division, and if they weren't located in God awful Oakland, I could see myself pulling for a team like them. It is amazing how poor their attendance is with a team that is as good as they are.


FWIW I agree with you and watch the A's closely as well, and agree with all that you have said.

However I don't necessarily think the Rangers are the better team. The A's have the best bullpen in the American League, and I think have better pitching overall.

Obviously the Rangers have one of the most potent offenses in baseball, but I think overall the A's are slightly better, and I'm not sure if this should count but I believe the main reason is that Bob Melvin is YEARS ahead of Ron Washington as a manager.
Posted by Bluegrass_Cat
GVL, SC
Member since Aug 2012
1634 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Astros just swept the Angels And took 3 out of 4 from the Rockies last week. A little momentum for that team could go a long way. I'm not saying the Astros will win the AL West, but they could be a spoiler. Oakland is lookin good though!




Not sure if serious. But Houston will not spoil anything in the AL West. The two teams competing for the division (Texas and Oakland) dominate Houston. Make no mistake Houston is still terrible. Don't let a good week out of six months fool you.
Posted by ThaBigFella
baton rouge
Member since Apr 2006
2043 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 10:00 am to
Oakland has the beane man thats all that matters
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 6/4/13 at 10:01 am to
quote:

I'm not saying the Astros will win the AL West, but they could be a spoiler

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram