Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Big money vs little money in college baseball

Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:20 pm
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6481 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:20 pm
I understand this isnt the normal occurrences for school that make goes far into the post season that have smaller school resources. I also understand that for some smaller teams, their journey to reach the post season may be less difficult to whatever degree to get there than the big college programs that fight to stay above water every weekend. Or is this broad range of programs regardless of nil/rev, being successful is becoming normal? The interesting part is teams from last yr that hopped into a regional, super and even Omaha combined with this year have a much much smaller payroll(nil/rev) than the big four conferences. You have one team that spent 50k on their roster making the post season and doing well and other teams with a 800k roster or higher that doesnt even make the post season. To take it even further, you have high dollar rosters hosting regionals to only get knocked out of their own regional by very small nil teams. Make it make sense. I find it to be a very interesting occurrence.
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 4:24 pm
Posted by LSUMANINVA
West Virginia
Member since Sep 2004
9536 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:27 pm to
AI’s answer: “That’s baseball.”
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6481 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:29 pm to
Its just interesting to me that "old school" attributes that makes a good team still mean something in college sports. Several times last weekend the most talented team did not win.
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 4:33 pm
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
19521 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:30 pm to
It truly is. “That’s Baseball “. The winner of the MLB World Series this year wil prob lose 50-60 games. Many to bad teams way worse than them. The game lends itself to strange unpredictable scores. Timely wins and good baseball fortune is necessary. No teams will win 80% of the time like other sports. Enjoy the long strange trip.
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6481 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:38 pm to
I guess my whole point in this is that it must suck for a coach/program to blow a million dollars in baseball making moves and misses the post season or gets knocked out of your own regional by a mid team that isnt even ranked in the top 40. We almost got it last season by Little Rock and got some good fortune in that game and eventually went on to win it all. Makes you wonder who actually lost out this past weekend that if they had pulled it out, would they have gone all the way this year? Crazy stuff.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
30853 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 4:41 pm to
If you want to understand, trend the average age of MLB rookies from the 1980’s to today…
Stop thinking about this as a single variable “analysis”. There are multiple layers of variables at play to any given roster at any given time with any given match-up.
Back before there was online gambling and all the apps, people used to get the newspaper and read the lines then call their bookie to place a bet. You had to know a hell if a lot more about the team, its players and their opponents. Algorithms have eliminated it for the most part and collectively lowered the collective knowledge of fans.
My point is Jay has stated on MULTIPLE occasions about the importance of older players. You can’t shortcut experience with ability once you’re at a certain level. For example, a .375 hitter one season may hit .325 the next and people think he is not hitting as well. It very well could be he was hitting behind another good to excellent hitter and in front of another. Pitchers have to show him more pitches.
You guys probably think Bill James Sabermetrics was from the 1990’s and not 1970’s.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
30853 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 8:26 pm to
I guess my whole point in this is that it must suck for a coach/program to blow a million dollars in baseball making moves and misses the post season or gets knocked out of your own regional by a mid team that isnt even ranked in the top 40. We almost got it last season by Little Rock and got some good fortune in that game and eventually went on to win it all.
Your whole point was to be a bitch.
The fricking game is 27 fricking outs your fricking tool.
Posted by sta4ever
Member since Aug 2014
17718 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 2:29 pm to
The only team that gave the 2025 College Baseball National Champs problems in the postseason, and was very close to eliminating them in their own regional, was a team with a losing record in Little Rock. College baseball is the best sport because of all the parity, and how any team can beat anyone, on any given day. In today’s world of college athletics, it’s very refreshing to still see that the teams with all the money, still can’t control the sport. Can’t say the same about College Basketball and Football.
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6481 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

College baseball is the best sport because of all the parity, and how any team can beat anyone, on any given day. In today’s world of college athletics, it’s very refreshing to still see that the teams with all the money, still can’t control the sport.
agreed 100%
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6481 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Your whole point was to be a bitch.
The fricking game is 27 fricking outs your fricking tool.
you got mental problems? Wtf Take your medicine and calm down. Nobody was bitching, what i said was reality and how fine the line is between winning and losing, what is and what could have been. The fact is evident that several schools fork out millions and nothing comes of it while others fork out peanuts and win. I felt that was an interesting park of college baseball.

Are you glad I responded to your immature tantrum? You need a hug? Smdh.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 2:55 pm
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
39136 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 2:57 pm to
Stockpiling pitching, which is especially important in the regionals, is likely more difficult now than it was pre-transfer portal which may add to randomness.

You saw teams like A&M completely depleted of pitching by the end of the regional.
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
6481 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 3:01 pm to
Yep agreed.

The key is the 1 and 2 guys(really two #1's) has to be nails.

23 and 25 imo had this. Ill get downvoted to oblivion but without the pitching we had, we dont win either.

Jay has the players for scoring and defense. We need 2 or 3 elite guys who dont walk batters and get k's and ground balls.

This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 3:03 pm
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
30853 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

you got mental problems? Wtf Take your medicine and calm down. Nobody was bitching, what i said was reality and how fine the line is between winning and losing, what is and what could have been. The fact is evident that several schools fork out millions and nothing comes of it while others fork out peanuts and win. I felt that was an interesting park of college baseball.

I gave your dumbass a logical explanation on the thread. You failed to read it and then posted the Little Rock “almost beating LsU last season”. This season you lose your ace for the entirety of the SEC and number 2 for 3 weekends considering how that arm issue came on.
That’s not how it fricking works dumbass. Go back and read the post about how the frick old some players are in smaller schools and the average age of MLB rookies. Look at the fricking draft changes, etc etc.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 8:16 pm
Posted by OscarTheGrouch
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2006
5855 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

Tiger1988




Posted by TheWalrus
Land of the Hogs
Member since Dec 2012
47581 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 8:50 pm to
These random small schools will make a run for one or two years and then never be heard from again. Fresno State and Stony Brook for example. So yeah some team spending little will hit the lottery once in a while, but sustained success is almost impossible. Schools spending lots of money will have down years but more success overall.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 8:53 pm
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
14877 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

Your whole point was to be a bitch.
The fricking game is 27 fricking outs your fricking tool.
Posted by New Money
Athens, GA
Member since Jun 2023
4173 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 5:54 am to
There’s making it to the post season, and there’s making it to Omaha.

Schools like East Carolina can win their conference and make it to a regional, but are they really serious contenders?

Then, even among the “power” conferences, Arizona had 34 scholarship players this year. Oklahoma State had less than half of that.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29355 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 9:33 am to
Posted by IamNotaRobot
OKC
Member since Nov 2021
1947 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:01 am to
I couldn’t tell you exactly why but Kansas for example signed 8 juco players and a D3 transfer for its current squad. Those are guys who know how to grind and just love playing baseball. Will that equate into a championship? Probably not but they’ve had a heck of a season so far.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
14807 posts
Posted on 6/4/26 at 10:13 am to
There’s a lot of talented players out there that are overlooked for no other reason than luck.. combine that with baseball being a streaky sport and you get the old saying…”Thats Baseball”
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram