Started By
Message

Big 10 and PAC 12 being shut out means expansion comes sooner than later

Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:04 pm
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22005 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:04 pm
Hopefully they will protest enough to force a change. I have always supported six teams (with top two getting byes). Eight teams could work too.

The ability to get a bye will make regular season more meaningful, which is why I like 6 teams more.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 6:50 pm
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:07 pm to
I agree but no matter how many teams it is team n+1 will be encouraged to bitch to fill air time.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53359 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:08 pm to
Do you go to auto bids then? A team not playing the CCG and gaining while the loser of the CCG is out will become more of a problem with more teams.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71704 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:09 pm to
Pass.

There isn't a single team ranked #4 or lower that has a realistic complaint about not getting in.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27305 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:10 pm to
I'd hate that.

The thing that makes college football so fun and different from any other sport is that if your team has national championship aspirations, every game is HUGE. When two great teams in the same conference meet, the games are monumental.

If you expand, those unbelievable games that both teams needed to win turns into "meh, we can still get in even with a loss".

I'd hate to lose that. It would be a complete turn off for me.

And what for? Just so some non-deserving conference champ from out West and a #6 seed can get a shot? No thanks.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:11 pm to
Power 5 Champs plus 1 at large? That ain't gonna work

8 might be better
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27305 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:14 pm to
Nobody is ever going to be satisfied and leave well enough alone.

It will expand to 6 after bitching and complaining. And then the people who support 8 teams will bitch and complain for years and eventually they will cave and it will expand to 8.

Then the next group of people will complain and it will change again. Etc.
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12310 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:18 pm to
Why? After a 12 game sample, no team from either conference deserves a shot at the title. I mean, the Big 10 didn't have a good OOC win. USC got blown out in their toughest OOC test. UW played nobody OOC.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59104 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:19 pm to
Nothing will change before current contract runs out
Posted by rolltide32
Fort Payne, AL
Member since Nov 2013
6516 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:20 pm to
We only had 3 team that's fit the criteria of both best and most deserving and you dumb fricks want an 8 team playoff? Seriously!?
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:21 pm to
Meh

Until a team gets legitimately screwed, any criticism seems futile.

Ohio State lost two games. One by 31 to a 7-5 team
USC lost two games. One by 35.

At the end of the day these teams failed to control thier own destiny.

Posted by Winston Cup
Dallas Cowboys Fan
Member since May 2016
65497 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

I have always supported six teams (with top two getting byes).

link?
Posted by OWLFAN86
The OT has made me richer
Member since Jun 2004
175893 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

Hopefully they will protest enough to force a change. I have always supported six teams (with top two getting byes).
this has been my preference

it means being a top 2 MEANS something but that one bad game doenst cost you a shot.

And you dont have to make it that conference winner get the auto-bid, but going to the CC and winning it helps you get that bye
Posted by Jax-Tiger
Port Saint Lucie, FL
Member since Jan 2005
24743 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

Eight teams could work too (again with top two getting byes).



8 teams would not allow you to have byes.

I wouldn't mind 12 teams, with 4 byes. Currently, the top 4 get in. In the new system, the top 4 would get a bye. Ohio State, the first team left out, would probably end up playing someone like UCF or Miami.
Posted by Lee Chatelain
I love the OT!
Member since Oct 2008
11343 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:46 pm to
If you had 8 teams you wouldn’t needs byes, correct?
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22005 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

every game is HUGE.
the bama/Auburn game was huge for the wrong reasons.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22005 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

8 teams would not allow you to have byes.
right. I messed that up in my head. Six teams is way to go.
Posted by TennesseeFan25
Honolulu
Member since May 2016
8391 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:53 pm to
Chicken, never saw your opinion

Would you have rather kept Les or gotten coach O?

Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35508 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:55 pm to
Pac-12 has missed the playoffs 2 out of 4 years...and has the lowest seeded Conference Champion in the playoff era at #8.

Pac-12 needs to be concerned about their scheduling these ridiculously late games that nobody but Sark after dark folks are watching.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:56 pm to
Playoff expansion is going to ruin the sport before CTE does.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram