- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Best reason to have a playoff?
Posted on 1/10/09 at 12:39 am
Posted on 1/10/09 at 12:39 am
...Because until we do, we will keep having this discussion every damn year.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 12:40 am to DocBugbear
To have an actual champion like every other sport.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 12:48 am to JJ27
quote:
To have an actual champion like every other sport.
ding ding ding
I know one day I'll run into a foreign sports fan who will ask me to explain college football
I will then explain all of it and I worry that he will laugh at me. A lot.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 12:50 am to LfcSU3520
The real reason is to have a bunch of good football games to watch... and most years this will include an extra LSU game!
Posted on 1/10/09 at 12:52 am to DocBugbear
quote:
we will keep having this discussion every damn year.
And there will be the same discussion once the '9th' team or whatever is snubbed out.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 12:56 am to DocBugbear
Sounds like something to go under the BCS column to me.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 8:39 am to Volvagia
quote:so we can have an all SEC semi final ?
Best reason to have a playoff?
Posted on 1/10/09 at 8:58 am to DocBugbear
quote:
Because until we do, we will keep having this discussion every damn year.
I don't think you get the fact that this is EXACTLY what the University Presidents want and like. The game is at an all time high in popularity. The attendance records keep falling, and the Cash keeps pouring in despite the state of the Economy.
People on this board are already predicting who will be on the LSU KICKOFF team next year!!!! ESPN just paid a gazillion dollars for the rights to broadcast the BCS.
Don't think for one minute that they care if people are "upset". Next week at work, 99% of the country won't give a frick about Utah or USC or Texas. I already don't.
Don't fight it bro. It is what it is.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 9:15 am to DocBugbear
quote:
The real reason is to have a bunch of good football games to watch
That's the biggest one to me for sure. I used to be really anti-playoff, but I've changed my mind. 8 teams is fine as long as the top 4 get to host the 1st round. There still has to be an incentive to go undefeated.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 9:19 am to Hot Carl
quote:
8 teams is fine as long as the top 4 get to host the 1st round.
won't ever happen
and this is actually an oft-forgotten logistical problem of a playoff
Posted on 1/10/09 at 9:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
logistical problem of a playoff
This is a huge hurdle. There are so many logistical problems that the pro-playoff guys seem to gloss over. Do you really expect a fan-base to travel for their conference championship game and then the 3 weeks of playoffs? To keep the sanctity of the regular season more intact, in an 8-team playoff, I'd actually like to see the top seeds host both the quarters and the semis.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 9:26 am to Hot Carl
quote:
Do you really expect a fan-base to travel for their conference championship game and then the 3 weeks of playoffs?
maybe, maybe not
what i do expect is for pro-playoff people to forget the fact that colleges often aren't located in metropolitan areas, while every NFL team is in a metropolitan area. the difference in available money to be spent is very, very different
quote:
To keep the sanctity of the regular season more intact, in an 8-team playoff, I'd actually like to see the top seeds host both the quarters and the semis.
i just don't see the NCAA allowing schools to host "home" playoff games
you're talking about $9-12M in net profit those schools could make that only 4 schools could make
Posted on 1/10/09 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
you're talking about $9-12M in net profit those schools could make that only 4 schools could make
I think it'd have to be split up somehow. The reward I'm talking about is home-field advantage, not more profit.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 9:32 am to Hot Carl
quote:
I think it'd have to be split up somehow.
not gunna happen, and i don't see how you could
even if slice off 10% and you split it up amongst playoff teams, that's still more haves and have nots
Posted on 1/10/09 at 9:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
what i do expect is for pro-playoff people to forget the fact that colleges often aren't located in metropolitan areas, while every NFL team is in a metropolitan area. the difference in available money to be spent is very, very different
Are you telling me that Richmond and Montana fans have more disposable money than LSU and USC fans?
Posted on 1/10/09 at 9:36 am to JJ27
quote:
Are you telling me that Richmond and Montana fans have more disposable money than LSU and USC fans?
Attendance #s
quote:
8. Richmond, 2,994, vs. Eastern Kentucky
let's not bring richmond into this
Posted on 1/10/09 at 9:38 am to JJ27
It's apples and oranges, but if App St can play 15 games, LSU can play 15 games.
They say "you can't do that in major college football," well why not? Both teams are full of student athletes. One shouldn't be treated any different than the other, and if you're worried about injury over a 15 game season, get ready for the NFL.
They say "you can't do that in major college football," well why not? Both teams are full of student athletes. One shouldn't be treated any different than the other, and if you're worried about injury over a 15 game season, get ready for the NFL.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 10:24 am to LfcSU3520
quote:
I know one day I'll run into a foreign sports fan who will ask me to explain college football
I will then explain all of it and I worry that he will laugh at me. A lot.
The BCS is a lot closer to the system the EPL, Serie A, etc uses than a playoff.
Posted on 1/10/09 at 11:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i just don't see the NCAA allowing schools to host "home" playoff games
you're talking about $9-12M in net profit those schools could make that only 4 schools could make
this is the single biggest reason this will NEVER happen
also, when people say, just use the current bowl locations. well thats even dumber, bc then the team that wins the championship will collect three bowl shares, and all of them will be large bowl shares. people bitch about how the small schools cant compete. this would actually make it HARDER for the small schools to compete
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News