Started By
Message

re: #7 Oregon (53) vs. #4 Stanford (30) | FINAL

Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:05 pm to
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87712 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:05 pm to
Holy shite
Posted by dawgdayafternoon
Jacksonville, GA
Member since Jul 2011
23776 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:05 pm to
at Stanford's tackling.
Posted by jefforize
Member since Feb 2008
46057 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:05 pm to
Fireworks starting already

Long td Oregon to open 2nd half

Thomas to #1 huff on a nice catch and run
This post was edited on 11/12/11 at 9:06 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
478279 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:06 pm to
hopefully this answers everyone's questions about stanford's D
Posted by Flair Chops
to the west, my soul is bound
Member since Nov 2010
35651 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:07 pm to
Slow, what do you think about Oregon's chance in a rematch?
Posted by jefforize
Member since Feb 2008
46057 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:07 pm to
I dont think they even touched dat, huff, or lmj on their tds, and even fell for the fricking swinging gate 2 pt conversion
Posted by dawgdayafternoon
Jacksonville, GA
Member since Jul 2011
23776 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:07 pm to
They were pretty good last year but they've looked awful tonight and in the USC game.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

hopefully this answers everyone's questions about stanford's D


I think most people knew going into this - we've said Stanford's D isn't built to beat Oregon.

Stanford needs a straightforward attack - they don't have enough athletes to hang when the field is spread. Stanford needed a conservative team like Bama.

Oklahoma and Okie State would rip Stanford too.
Posted by Flair Chops
to the west, my soul is bound
Member since Nov 2010
35651 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:10 pm to
Sack lunch
Posted by wope
Member since Aug 2011
5684 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:11 pm to
this is over if oregon scores again
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87712 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:11 pm to
wow
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
478279 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

I think most people knew going into this - we've said Stanford's D isn't built to beat Oregon.

i think a lot of SECtards had yet to see stanford and tnought their D was good b/c of their offensive style
Posted by jefforize
Member since Feb 2008
46057 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:11 pm to
Terrible muff by lmj
Posted by dawgdayafternoon
Jacksonville, GA
Member since Jul 2011
23776 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:12 pm to
Muff. Big break for teh Cardinal.
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:12 pm to
Man, Oregon just coughs it up whenever they play a Top 5 team.
Posted by Flair Chops
to the west, my soul is bound
Member since Nov 2010
35651 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:13 pm to
Inexcusable
Posted by Flair Chops
to the west, my soul is bound
Member since Nov 2010
35651 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:14 pm to


Holy shite
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
39160 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:14 pm to
Shaw is an idiot.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87712 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:15 pm to
awful kick
Posted by ATLienTiger
NOLA
Member since Oct 2006
27310 posts
Posted on 11/12/11 at 9:15 pm to
Might be the most wide miss I've ever seen on a FG. He missed that by about 20 yards.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram