- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: #5 Stanford vs #15 U-Dub at the Farm | 31-28 | 2:34 4th Q | Faded...Bitches
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:03 am to Nonetheless
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:03 am to Nonetheless
quote:
So then why are you talking about the position of his arms?
Because the brown on the turf is the ball not his arm
This post was edited on 10/6/13 at 1:04 am
0
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:04 am to VerlanderBEAST
/thread
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:05 am to wish i was tebow
quote:I still call BS and I have no horse here.
it was pretty clear that it hit the ground
correct.
Call on the field was catch. Every angle I saw was questionable. That is not overturn material. You can't say, I think he didn't catch it and overrule the call on the field.
That's some mucky waters.
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:06 am to Carson123987
dont bring facts to this!
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:06 am to Carson123987
I thought the ball hit the ground. But I thought that whatever was called on the field would stand. Conclusive means that you as 100 people and all 100 people agree what happened. I don't think you could make that case here.
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:07 am to Carson123987
Your picture is proof that the call should not have been reversed...you can't see shite from that picture...is that white blue a stripe on the ball or a sweatband on his right arm? (he has a sweatband on his left arm).
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:07 am to Carson123987
quote:You're better than this.
Carson123987
Come on.
If the calling on the field is incomplete. Done. You can't reverse the call with any evidence I've seen - incl that pic.
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:08 am to TDawg1313
i just think it's pretty clear since given the amount of ball visible and that there is no hand under it
i understand yalls positions though
i understand yalls positions though
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:08 am to Carson123987
To end the debate about whether the ball hit the ground or not, you post a picture of the ball not hitting the ground
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:08 am to wish i was tebow
Christ. The ball can touch the ground if your hand is underneath it and you maintain possession throughout. I'll gladly concede that it appeared the nose was touching the ground for a brief moment, but if his left hand is under the other nose then it can still be a catch. Regardless, there is no way there is enough to overturn the call. I'd say the same if it had been ruled incomplete on the field.
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:09 am to Mizzoufan26
quote:
To end the debate about whether the ball hit the ground or not, you post a picture of the ball not hitting the ground
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:09 am to Carson123987
That pic proves nothing 
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:12 am to Flame Salamander
quote:
Your picture is proof that the call should not have been reversed...you can't see shite from that picture...is that white blue a stripe on the ball or a sweatband on his right arm? (he has a sweatband on his left arm).
lol if the sweatband on his right bicep is all the way on his lower left torso then the only way he could of caught the ball is with his helmet. He also would of broken his arm.
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:13 am to Diddles
As with the other thread:
I'm leaving these discussions with this:
It was NOT a catch, but should NOT have been overturned. That's a double frick up by the Refs IMO.
I'm leaving these discussions with this:
It was NOT a catch, but should NOT have been overturned. That's a double frick up by the Refs IMO.
This post was edited on 10/6/13 at 1:14 am
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:14 am to Carson123987
it's called agenda.
the PAC-12 officials did what was best for their conference with keeping Stanford in the national title hunt along with Oregon. they are desperate to win a football championship.
the PAC-12 officials did what was best for their conference with keeping Stanford in the national title hunt along with Oregon. they are desperate to win a football championship.
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:14 am to drizztiger
This post was edited on 10/6/13 at 1:15 am
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:18 am to Weebie
The ball hit the ground.
Nobody on the Huskie side was even throwing a fit about it. It was close, the receiver sold it and it intially paid off. But it was going to get overturned and they knew it.
Nobody on the Huskie side was even throwing a fit about it. It was close, the receiver sold it and it intially paid off. But it was going to get overturned and they knew it.
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:19 am to Nonetheless
quote:
you post a picture of the ball not hitting the ground
the ball is clearly touching the ground
how are yall not seeing this the issue is whether or not he had a hand under the other nose and the fact that it was an inconclusive camera angle
im gonna have to make a slowmo gif
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:34 am to Carson123987
Sark called out Stanford for faking injuries in the post game show.
Posted on 10/6/13 at 1:37 am to TDawg1313
That's a legit gripe but until real consequences get attached to it, it's going to be used to slow down a hot and fast moving offense.
Page 14 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News