Started By
Message

re: 49ers extending Purdy - five years, $265 million ($181 million guaranteed)

Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:25 pm to
Posted by bonstonker
Member since Jan 2008
361 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:25 pm to
When the owner is stupid enough to say he is a top 10 qb,it's no surprise when he is paid as one.

Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8963 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:30 pm to
There are not a lot of QBs at the top of that list who deserve to be at the top of that list
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
17175 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

Half a billion dollar on that list every year and not a one of them has won a ring.
True, but the list of active QBs who’ve won a ring that have any business near this group is actually only 2 people

1. Mahomes’ 10-year contract ($45m average) was the record deal when he signed 5 years ago. He is also #1 in endorsement money ($25m) by more than $10m. This makes it easy for him to keep a team-friendly contract, as when you add endorsements to comp he IS the highest paid player

2. Hurts ($51m) is just off this list and now that he has a ring will end up Top 3 after next contact

Everyone else active with a ring (Stafford, Rodgers, Wilson, Flacco, Foles) is WAY past deserving of a Top 10 contract
This post was edited on 5/16/25 at 6:11 pm
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39193 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Look at the lack of Super Bowls in that list.


That's why all the "you just have to sign your QB to a max contract!" posters on here are idiots. Actual evidence says that you almost never should. In the last 15 years, how many QBs on one of these mega-contracts have won it all? Mahomes the first year of his recent deal did; but the consequences of that contract hadn't hit the Chiefs yet.

If I'm an owner, I'd let the QB walk every time and rely on developing a new one while keeping the rest of the roster balanced.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
37270 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 5:48 pm to
The state of California loves this contract and all the taxes coming their way
This post was edited on 5/16/25 at 5:49 pm
Posted by Marktastic86
Pismo Beach, CA
Member since Dec 2020
21185 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

Purdy good raise for him. Going from making less than a mil a year as Mr irrelevant. Crazy.

It's a great story. I was at the game vs Miami where Jimmy G got injured and he came in. I turned to my friends and said, "well, we're probably about to lose. We're down to our rookie 7th round pick at QB." Purdy came in and threw 2 TD's in the first half, and never gave up the starting job.

Keep in mind a big part of his contract is for services rendered. Lynch said as much in a previous interview. He would have taken SF to back to back Super Bowls, one as a rookie, if he didn't get injured in the NFC championship. The guy is a winner. Hopefully Shanahan's bottom of the barrel philosophy on offensive linemen doesn't get him killed.

Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
17175 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

In the last 15 years, how many QBs on one of these mega-contracts have won it all?
The highest paid QB in 2010 averaged less than $20m/year. The modern mega-contract is a new thing. The modern mega-contract is also often subject to eventual restructuring, which in many cases would retroactively remove the “mega” labeling entirely

9 of those 15 are first ballot Hall of Fame
3 are just outside in the Hall of Great
3 are Hall of Meh / TBD

If you want to look back at what wins Super Bowls, the formula is more direct - just end up with a Top 5 QB at the time
This post was edited on 5/16/25 at 6:37 pm
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39193 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:38 pm to
On a cheap contract
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
15102 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

Yeah, and the other teams on that list are hopeless with respect to keeping a good team together. Particularly the Bills Purdy won’t even be in the Top 10 by next offseason

The difference is that the 49ers are built differently than other teams. At some point during Purdy’s rookie contract, the 49ers had the highest paid LT, RB, Edge, TE, and even FB. Plus they had two of the highest paid WRs at one point.

They’ve spent a lot of money on premium positions while Purdy was on his rookie contract. They can no longer allocate resources as they have been doing.

They went to three straight NFC Championship games because they built around a dirt cheap QB. They are going to have to change their formula going forward. Purdy didn’t reset the QB market, and the salary cap continues to increase substantially every year. However, the 49ers will be impacted more than most other teams by paying a QB $50M+ per season.
Posted by RemouladeSawce
Uranus
Member since Sep 2008
17175 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

They went to three straight NFC Championship games because they built around a dirt cheap QB. They are going to have to change their formula going forward.
True, but they already know what that formula looks like - they recently went to 3 NFC Championships in 4 years with a Top 10 highest-paid player (Top 5 average over 3 of those years). His name was Jimmy G, and the rest of his team was young on friendly contracts with few high-priced veterans eating into the cap. Then the roster flipped with those players getting paid and a budget QB. Somehow the Niners kept winning

The reset this offseason follows the initial formula. If the front office continues to hit and the staff continues to develop the cycle phase won’t matter

The blow is further softened by these absurd cap increases and in 2 years decent chance he’s not even in the Top 15 highest paid. Once his generational wealth is secured and he’s made whole for his budget rookie contract, decent chance there’s a restructuring anyway
This post was edited on 5/16/25 at 11:47 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115633 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

That's why all the "you just have to sign your QB to a max contract!" posters on here are idiots. Actual evidence says that you almost never should. In the last 15 years, how many QBs on one of these mega-contracts have won it all? Mahomes the first year of his recent deal did; but the consequences of that contract hadn't hit the Chiefs yet.


Hurts last year

Mahommes the year before as you mention.

Matt Stafford two years before that

Everyone else in that time frame is retired or extremely washed up today. Most were making big dollars at their time of winning

quote:

I'm an owner, I'd let the QB walk every time and rely on developing a new one while keeping the rest of the roster balanced.


Buddy if you think the odds are low for winning the superbowl with an expensive QB, you should check out the hit rates on drafting a QB that doesn’t suck arse
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39193 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 7:53 pm to
Check out the rates for overpaying.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216143 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 7:58 pm to
Gee. How many of those on that list have been to a SB besides Burrow????
Posted by Translator
Member since May 2025
469 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 8:06 pm to
How many years before we get a QB getting $100 mil/year? Burrow and Allen, when compared to the rest of the list, look like a bargain.
Posted by SA4LSU
AZ
Member since Sep 2005
4809 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 8:19 pm to
Look at their schedule, it was the right move they are a guaranteed 12 win team. They stay relevant and everyone keeps their job…
Posted by bcoop199
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2013
8909 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 8:53 pm to
Who's contract is the worst of these listed? Gotta go with Trevor at this point he's got 1 playoff win. Maybe it's Tua, 1 more concussion and his career should be over.

Dak Prescott: $60M
Joe Burrow: $55M
Josh Allen: $55M
Jordan Love: $55M
Trevor Lawrence: $55M
Tua Tagovailoa: $53.1M
Brock Purdy: $53M
Jared Goff: $53M
This post was edited on 5/16/25 at 8:54 pm
Posted by UncleRuckus
Member since Feb 2013
9680 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

I truly think Shanahan and a really good supporting cast could make a lot of cheap QBs look good

If Shanahan believed that, they wouldn’t have paid Purdy. But I’m sure you know more about it than Shanahan himself.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115633 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Check out the rates for overpaying.


I guarantee the results are a lot better than 95 percent of the QBs drafted every year.
Posted by redfish99
B.R.
Member since Aug 2007
18744 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 9:29 pm to
Damn what a pitiful signing . Just above mediocre. They’ll never get there with him. Teams are scared to death to let middle of road QB’s walk……
This post was edited on 5/17/25 at 5:24 pm
Posted by Lexis Dad
Member since Apr 2025
5692 posts
Posted on 5/16/25 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

If I'm an owner, I'd let the QB walk every time and rely on developing a new one


Considering QB's are less than a 50/50 shot of panning out.

Yeah, good luck with that.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram