- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 32 DI Olympic sports teams have been cut since the House settlement
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:27 am to Mingo Was His NameO
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:27 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
The courts have already done this, dozens of times at this point. It’s all public, you can go read it
Oh, so you’re also stupid enough to believe courts only rule on the constitutionality of things. Amazing
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:28 am to danilo
quote:Then it’s time to cut every sport besides basketball and football
This ain’t middle school sports. This is a business.
Even lsu baseball would be cut because they can’t have a season with no opponents….
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:29 am to lsupride87
quote:
Then it’s time to cut every sport besides basketball and football
Cry me a fricking river
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:29 am to msutiger
quote:
What in the world would you know about athletic department financials of Sun Belt schools?
Other than being a Louisiana Tech alum, serving on an advisory board there, going to high school with a former athletic directors kids, knowing the current athletic director, football coach, and staffers - nothing
This post was edited on 6/18/25 at 10:30 am
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:32 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Wait you believe that every D1 athletic department is wholly separate from the university it's attached to?
At the schools “making too much money” that are driving this entire conversation, yes they are.
At schools like ulm that you clearly don’t want to talk about and aren’t “making too much money” not they’re not.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:33 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
and aren’t “making too much money” not they’re not.
Triple negative
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:35 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
I never said that
have to have a place for them to office
So you’re either still a lying bitch, or you’re stupid enough to argue an office already built and paid for somehow costs more again when an employee moves into it.
Which is it?
quote:
Idiotic shite like this invalidates anything you try to say in earnest. Which may be nothing anyway
The fact that you run away from every response that completely invalidates everything you are so wrong about is all the validation I need.
This post was edited on 6/18/25 at 10:39 am
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:36 am to RollTide1987
quote:
When the NCAA was first established (1906) there was nothing but the best intentions. I don’t think the organization’s founders could have foreseen that within 100 years, coaches would have yearly salaries in the millions of dollars, that stadiums would pack in fans in their hundreds of thousands, and that games would be watched by tens of millions of Americans on national television.
if only they spent 100+ years rethinking how the most valuable assets were compensated instead of going after programs for free tattoos and other ticky tack recruiting violations
The NCAA might have still had some friends at various universities if they ruled with any semblance of equality instead of going after lesser programs for violations that are happening at every single program.
Even the most hardline self-righteous fanbase, Michigan, turned on them after the covid dead period/burgergate stuff.
This post was edited on 6/18/25 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:38 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
an office already built and paid for somehow costs more again when an employee moves into it.
There’s these things called operating costs
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:40 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
There’s these things called operating costs
Congrats, you read about that term in a textbook.
Tell us what you think those are exactly at a place like ul when a new employee is hired. Show us the full depth of your stupidity.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:42 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Other than being a Louisiana Tech alum, serving on an advisory board there, going to high school with a former athletic directors kids, knowing the current athletic director, football coach, and staffers - nothing
Great please tell me what areas of Louisiana Tech’s athletic department are bloated. Please be specific.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:45 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Tell us what you think those are exactly at a place like ul when a new employee is hired. Show us the full depth of your stupidity.
Desk, computer, paper, shredding services, increased janitorial costs.
If one more employee is hired, many of those are probably negligible, but when when departments have expanded like they have in the last couple of decades, those numbers become meaningful.
I don’t have UL’s numbers on hand, but Iowa state spends over $40 million per year just on the athletic department, not sports, the department
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:54 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Cut that unneeded job that never should have existed, congrats you’ve funded women’s tennis
Why tho?
Posted on 6/18/25 at 10:58 am to RollTide1987
A shocking turn of events that no one saw coming.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 11:25 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Desk, computer, paper, shredding services, increased janitorial costs.
Desk and computer are fixed assets already in place from previous office occupants. Chair too, can’t believe you left that off. Light bulbs and air filters are also already in place.
Paper is on auto-delivery in bulk.
Shredding services, if they have them, is a contract with fixed terms on payments and pickups.
Janitors are staff members paid by the hour or contractors paid a fixed amount for the entire space they work.
Grasping at straws doesn’t even begin to describe. You are beyond pathetic
quote:
If one more employee is hired, many of those are probably negligible, but when when departments have expanded like they have in the last couple of decades, those numbers become meaningful.
How many additional reems of paper do you reckon ulm has had to buy for all these new employees over the years that could’ve instead funded women’s tennis?
quote:
I don’t have UL’s numbers on hand, but Iowa state spends over $40 million per year just on the athletic department, not sports, the department
Your stupidity in this thread started with you not knowing how large the ad staff is at ulm, what those people are paid, or how a small department like that operates. Stop trying to change the subject now.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 11:37 am to Open Your Eyes
quote:
Desk and computer are fixed assets already in place from previous office occupants.
If you are expanding the department there were no previous occupants, which is the overall point DA
Posted on 6/18/25 at 11:57 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Especially on this site, where the purport to be freedom loving Americans (unless they don’t like something of course)
Please, please, please! play the "muh capitalism!!!" card and finish the job of exposing your stupidity. I'm going to type this (again), so read it slowly so maybe even you can understand:
Prior to NIL, college football and basketball players were overpaid. Yes, overpaid. There is absolutely no market for 18-22 college football players. None. How do we know this? In the hundred odd years these poor players were "exploited" not one group of entrepreneurs came along and started a league using 18-22 yr old men. I wonder why? Could it be that outside of the university system and the traditions and culture of collegiate athletics these players have no market (muh capitalism!)??? People don't pay a single dollar to watch Tim Tebow, Derrick Henry or Marvin Harrison, Jr. They pay billions to see those players play for the University of Florida, University of Alabama and Ohio State University, respectively. That's their draw. How many people would have payed to see them play for a minor-league team several steps below the USFL or XFL? There's your answer.
Let's cut to the chase. If the player base wasn't (largely) black, and the coaching ranks weren't (largely) white, the do-gooders and race baiters wouldn't give a shite about the players. This is just another virtue signaling crusade for these idiots. And when they destroy collegiate athletics, they'll just move along like locusts to their next look-at-me cause.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 12:04 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Let's cut to the chase. If the player base wasn't (largely) black, and the coaching ranks weren't (largely) white, the do-gooders and race baiters wouldn't give a shite about the players. This is just another virtue signaling crusade for these idiots.
You’re broken, touch grass
Posted on 6/18/25 at 12:11 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
If you support the freedom for compensation, then you should also support the freedom for universities to cut sports that sink money. If people really gave a damn about track and field or whatever, they would watch it on TV and attend in person. If it happens and no one cares, does it really even matter?
I dont care if the players get paid, if sports get cut or added, or if it turns into a semi pro league. Im to the point of football and wrestling only for college sports, and that is waning quickly.
I dont care if the players get paid, if sports get cut or added, or if it turns into a semi pro league. Im to the point of football and wrestling only for college sports, and that is waning quickly.
Posted on 6/18/25 at 12:15 pm to El Segundo Guy
quote:
If you support the freedom for compensation, then you should also support the freedom for universities to cut sports that sink money.
I do support it in theory. I also personally believe that institutions of higher learning and interscholastic athletics shouldn’t always be profit driven.
Popular
Back to top


0





