- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/3/18 at 8:19 pm to jefforize
Eh it's whatever. Even with a win in regulation they'll be even in points with the Bruins having an extra game to play and the season series. Still the Bruins look awful this game. Surprised it was scoreless after 1
Posted on 4/3/18 at 8:39 pm to WaterLink
appears rumors of tampa's demise were greatly exaggerated...
...the rumors I tried to start earlier this morning
...the rumors I tried to start earlier this morning
Posted on 4/3/18 at 8:41 pm to jefforize
Jackets should just go ahead and retire Panarins number now
Posted on 4/3/18 at 8:57 pm to jefforize
Jackets win in OT.
I'll be at the game on Thursday vs the pens.
It will be electric.

I'll be at the game on Thursday vs the pens.
It will be electric.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:25 pm to KosmoCramer
BS goaltending interference call on the predators to end that game. Preds had tied it up 2-2 to go into OT and the review of the call was goaltender interference. Even the guys on the NBC hockey night are saying it was the wrong call.

Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:30 pm to coondaddy21
I'm a new NHL fan I'm still sitting here wondering how the heck that was interference.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:33 pm to Burhead
no one knows what nhl interference is and it changes daily
"cannot prevent the gk from making an attempt to make a save" or whatever is the 'official rule'
i need to see a replay..one sec
"cannot prevent the gk from making an attempt to make a save" or whatever is the 'official rule'
i need to see a replay..one sec
This post was edited on 4/3/18 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:36 pm to jefforize
arvidsson's stick hit luongo's skate and moved him.
not agreeing or disagreeing but thats probably what was called
not agreeing or disagreeing but thats probably what was called
Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:38 pm to jefforize
quote:
arvidsson's stick hit luongo's skate and moved him.
not agreeing or disagreeing but thats probably what was called
Puck doesnt come free to be tapped in without that. I'm not upset about the call.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:41 pm to AZBayouBengal07
looks like a good call to me too but im biased against the toothcats
your team is shitting on mine again
your team is shitting on mine again
Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:42 pm to AZBayouBengal07
From my view, Luango's pad covers up Ardvy's stick and his momentum is turning him. If you look closely, Ardvy is trying to remove his stick from Luango's glove, which is over the top of Ardvy's stick. You see goals like this all the time with traffic around the net and rarely is a call made like this.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:42 pm to AZBayouBengal07
If that is going to be standard applied, every single time a goalie gets touched in a loose-puck scrum should be goaltender interference. No one on the ice complained for a second. Luongo didn't say anything to the ref. They all knew it was a good goal, but Toronto went full retard.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:52 pm to coondaddy21
At least there's an argument to be made for it, even if it is a little ticky tack. I'm not even a Preds fan but that whistle preventing a goal in the SCF still makes my blood boil
Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:59 pm to jefforize
quote:
your team is shitting on mine again
Im still waiting for someone to kick Frolik's arse for what he did to Chychrun. Intentional or not, a super dirty play.
We're really lucky to be up, not playing well at all.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 9:59 pm to WaterLink
If that's the standard going forward, there's going to be a brawl in the playoffs when a game winning goal is disallowed.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 10:02 pm to WaterLink
quote:
At least there's an argument to be made for it, even if it is a little ticky tack
Even granting that there may be some very weak interpretation of the GI rule that suggests this might be GI, isn't the standard for a review to be that the call on the ice is egregiously or blatantly incorrect? I'm not sure what the NHL phrasing is, but it is something close to that wording.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 10:11 pm to KosmoCramer
A few thoughts. Was at the Jackets-Wings game tonight. Slow build to a strong finish. Happy Z came back. Going to Toronto for replay didn't help shite. GI is the "what is a catch" of the NHL variety.
This post was edited on 4/3/18 at 10:12 pm
Popular
Back to top


1





