- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/25/26 at 2:44 pm to NaturalBeam
quote:So we wont even hear about contracts until later this year or 2027, much less begin production? Is that what I'm hearing?
But it's really going to be this year and twenty seven that things will really take off. Meaning we will get to the negotiation of various supply contracts."
Posted on 3/25/26 at 2:54 pm to NaturalBeam
quote:
Again, I didn't hear the quote - but this would be the biggest news of anything, I believe.
Everything she said was a re-iteration of what she previously has said.
She had no ability to change any previously disclosed information or add any new information given the nature of the event.
Now visually she seemed eager to share soon but who knows - been in that plane for awhile
Posted on 3/25/26 at 3:21 pm to igoringa
Any rule that stifles a shareholder meeting doesn’t make sense to me. I know it is not well attended but it is a somewhat public meeting. It seems like the perfect time to lay out public information.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 3:46 pm to Neauxla
[So we wont even hear about contracts until later this year or 2027, much less begin production? Is that what I'm hearing?]
"As everyone is aware, this is the year that we've been communicating for quite a long time that revenue will kick in. Look forward to more press releases regarding our commercial developments."
Posted on 3/25/26 at 3:49 pm to Guntoter1
I’m sure after the Nasdaq listing we will hear some things
Posted on 3/25/26 at 4:25 pm to igoringa
I fast forwarded through most of the science - the last 10-15 minutes is about the company and outlook, and man all I can think after watching is I don't have enough shares 
Posted on 3/25/26 at 5:54 pm to NaturalBeam
Kevin Bambrough Interview with Doug Casey
quote:
Podcast hosts interview Kevin Bambrough, author and former Sprott CEO, about why he became a major shareholder in Hydrograph and why he believes graphene—specifically Hydrograph’s turbo-stratic, fractal graphene aggregates—solves key industry problems like clumping and poor dispersion that plagued earlier graphite-derived approaches. Bambrough recounts his investing background and explains graphene’s sought-after properties (strength, conductivity, EMF shielding) and why Hydrograph’s purity and SP2 bonding matter for real-world applications. The panel discusses potential use cases across polymers, coatings, tires, construction materials, batteries, semiconductors, and military needs, plus Hydrograph’s patent moat and licensing potential. They cover manufacturing via acetylene/oxygen combustion in a chamber, economics such as a stated $250,000/ton price with far lower required loadings, modular “Hyperion” scaling, work with dozens of companies, and catalysts like EPA approvals, a possible Nasdaq listing, and a Texas gas-plant partnership, while noting execution and IP/theft as key risks.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 6:18 pm to igoringa
Good video. All the positive stuff. One of the comments was asking about graphene's toxicity (it was used in the Covid vaccines) ad how would be recycled.
I am assuming un pure graphene would not be good to inject into someone but her post got me thinking about recycling Hydrograph's graphene. KB was talking about how will it bonds to so many materials would that be a problem down the road. For example cooper, which is easily recycled to the point that most cooper very mined and produced is still in use today. Would that become a problem. With steel or aluminum?
Just my thoughts.
My other thought is the Hyperion units. My background is automotive consulting so I have done my share of investing failures and I am knowledgeable of the history of the internal combustion engine and all of the research that has been done since the early 80's in what happens when hydrocarbons combusts and the pressures and heats produced and the resulting stress and metal fatigue that affects engine life spans. Hydrograph is doing the same thing except, as far as I know, at atmospheric pressure and not like in an engine with a 10-1 compression ratio but still in a 70 liter combustion chamber with some apparatus in the combustion chamber from the illustrations. In an IC engine all of those fuel and ignition controls are outside of the combustion chambers where the pressure and heat are.
So, I assume that HG has not run these unit(s) on continuous duty cycles for weeks at a time. In the the auto and truck engine business they will run them hard through ridiculous cycles to stress test them, fix what breaks and do that again. I would hate to see their expensive units break form the wear and tear from that kind of environment.
Sorry for the long post. I have skin in this and am bullish but I am a nuts and bults guy.
I am assuming un pure graphene would not be good to inject into someone but her post got me thinking about recycling Hydrograph's graphene. KB was talking about how will it bonds to so many materials would that be a problem down the road. For example cooper, which is easily recycled to the point that most cooper very mined and produced is still in use today. Would that become a problem. With steel or aluminum?
Just my thoughts.
My other thought is the Hyperion units. My background is automotive consulting so I have done my share of investing failures and I am knowledgeable of the history of the internal combustion engine and all of the research that has been done since the early 80's in what happens when hydrocarbons combusts and the pressures and heats produced and the resulting stress and metal fatigue that affects engine life spans. Hydrograph is doing the same thing except, as far as I know, at atmospheric pressure and not like in an engine with a 10-1 compression ratio but still in a 70 liter combustion chamber with some apparatus in the combustion chamber from the illustrations. In an IC engine all of those fuel and ignition controls are outside of the combustion chambers where the pressure and heat are.
So, I assume that HG has not run these unit(s) on continuous duty cycles for weeks at a time. In the the auto and truck engine business they will run them hard through ridiculous cycles to stress test them, fix what breaks and do that again. I would hate to see their expensive units break form the wear and tear from that kind of environment.
Sorry for the long post. I have skin in this and am bullish but I am a nuts and bults guy.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 6:22 pm to Swazla
I’m not sure the frequency and tonnage per detonation has been released.
I doubt they’re cycling nonstop but who knows.
I doubt they’re cycling nonstop but who knows.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 6:35 pm to dkreller
I really want them to succeed. Not only for my bank account but for the good of the whole country and beyond. But I don't see anyone in their management that has been thru the battles of continuous production.
Posted on 3/25/26 at 6:36 pm to Swazla
quote:
Graphene can complicate recycling of metals like copper, steel, and aluminum, but it’s unlikely to become a major systemic problem. It’s more of a process adjustment issue than a dealbreaker.
C
From chatjipity
Posted on 3/25/26 at 6:51 pm to dstone12
At least it’s not like carbon fiber
Popular
Back to top

0







