Started By
Message

re: Solar Power Incentives in Louisiana: State & Federal..

Posted on 5/27/13 at 10:52 pm to
Posted by islandtiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2012
1787 posts
Posted on 5/27/13 at 10:52 pm to
Building a new house with 10kw solar. Roof maintenence/repair issue minimized by installing metal roof.
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
48677 posts
Posted on 5/27/13 at 10:56 pm to
Nice. Is the initial cost being rolled into the mortgage?

How much are they charging for the install? $35K?
Posted by islandtiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2012
1787 posts
Posted on 5/27/13 at 11:08 pm to
Still working with contractor with design, but estimate is about $2,500 to $3,000 per kw so $25,000 to $30,000. Looking to pay cash for most/all of construction but considering a mortgage due to rates. If we go the mortgage route, solar would be part of construction loan.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 12:43 am to
Read up on SolarCity. It's an interesting business model that I've been trying to further understand for my own reasons.
Posted by Captain Ron
Location: Ted's
Member since Dec 2012
4340 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Still working with contractor with design, but estimate is about $2,500 to $3,000 per kw so $25,000 to $30,000


Do you have roof dimensions of your house plans? Send them to the email address I posted in the OP and I'll see if I can help you get a better deal.

Are you letting the electrical contractor install the panels and the roofing contractor install the roof mounts?
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
47143 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 9:50 am to
quote:

But you aren't buying it at full price...hence his point.


Somebody is confused.

When you buy the electricity from the power company you ALWAYS pay full price.

The subsidy is for the equipment to let you generate your own.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:07 am to
quote:

And what about dismantling and reassembly due to the need for a new roof?


My neighborhood has a large number of solar installations, many have been installed for several years now, leaking and damaged roofs from improper installation of the solar panels is starting to be a problem.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Somebody is confused.

That person is you

1) You get $20,000 from your neighbors, so that you can also get paid to produce energy

2) When your crappy system doesnt provide enough power, you want to pull from the grid (with my $20,000 still in your pocket) and act like theres nothing to see here

Conclusion: You want solar power, pay for it with your own dollars.

Addendum: We know you wont, because you know that you can never get RoI. So stop acting like its the coming thing
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
47143 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:23 am to
Did you all read what the PSC guy said?

Apparently not.

quote:

2) When your crappy system doesnt provide enough power, you want to pull from the grid (with my $20,000 still in your pocket) and act like theres nothing to see here


Buying power from the power company at retail price is not 'pulling from the grid' as you say it - as if it's some shady scheme to slip some energy into your house under the table.

Liberalism is a disease, fight it bro.
Posted by Captain Ron
Location: Ted's
Member since Dec 2012
4340 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:23 am to
quote:

1) You get $20,000 from your neighbors, so that you can also get paid to produce energy


More like your neighbors paying $0.00625 per $25,000 installation in state taxes and $0.00005 per $25,000 installation in federal taxes.

At least a system like this is going to people who are paying taxes. Not many welfare recipients are jumping to install modules on their government housing.

quote:

2) When your crappy system doesnt provide enough power


You're not paying for a complete off-the-grid system here. You're reducing the power you pull off the grid (i.e. pay for), which can be anywhere from a 30% to 70% reduction; depending on your monthly household power consumption. BTW this is happening during peak hours which will actually benefits the utility because it reduces the amount of power they have to provide during the hot-assed summer days. Also, the power you are sending back is of higher quality than what the utility provides.

quote:

Addendum: We know you wont, because you know that you can never get RoI. So stop acting like its the coming thing


I think someone already posted that they installed a system at their parents house which will have a ROI of 5 years, AND have backup power via batteries during utility outages.
This post was edited on 5/28/13 at 10:35 am
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 11:03 am to
The supporting documentation required for the Louisiana credit is nothing to sneeze at. One requirement is the name and license number of the contractor who does the installation. LINK

You can get around the $12,500 limit per system by installing multiple small systems instead of a single large system. You just have to make sure each system stays under $25,000 total cost.
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 11:50 am to
quote:

Not many welfare recipients are jumping to install modules on their government housing.

Welfare is welfare. Doesnt matter who the recipient is

Govt doesnt get to pick the winners and losers. Solar gets subsidies, oil and coal get carbon taxed. Sorry thats wrong.
Posted by ThisWayChad
Member since Nov 2009
2556 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Govt doesnt get to pick the winners and losers.


What government are you talking about?
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
47143 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Govt doesnt get to pick the winners and losers.


What government are you talking about?


Well, to be technical, he's right.

You see many government winners out there?
Posted by islandtiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2012
1787 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 5:33 pm to
It all depends on your definition of subsidy. Not paying the full cost for air and water contamination by many industries might be considered a subsidy (I.e., not internalizing the externalities). Billions in military spending spent keeping the Middle East "stable" and producing oil, might be considered a subsidy., etc.
Posted by islandtiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2012
1787 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 5:38 pm to
We are building on an island in Washington state...probably out of your service area! We are using a contractor who specializes in green construction (several builder of the year and US Dept of Energy awards) so feel pretty confident we will get a fair price. I will post the final estimates for solar when we get them and you guys can tell me if we are being treated fairly.
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 6:02 pm to
self-moderated.

Wrong board. lol
This post was edited on 5/28/13 at 6:44 pm
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15375 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 9:49 am to
At least in La there is sun to be had. In California they had a similar solar subsidy program, and on a per capita basis it was most popular in San Francisco. Which gets sun roughly 25 days a year.

There was a minor uproar about this because, obviously, it'd have been a lot more efficient for those wealthy SF'ers to pay the money to rednecks out in the Central Valley, where they get sun approximately 363 brutal days a year, to install them on their houses. But of course no one would do that because a solar panel isn't just a solar panel, it's an outward and visible manifestation of the fact that you are the Right Kind of Person. Mt 6:2, etc.
Posted by LSUchuck
Member since Dec 2004
1546 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 10:40 am to
Pretty sure the state is doing away with or limiting the credit substantially for 2013.

Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15375 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 1:58 pm to
One might also ask, if the government is so gungho about solar-generated electricity, why didn't it simply take all the money it spent in tax rebates and build a single giant solar panel facility. Presumably this would've been much more efficient in terms of kwH/$, not to mention it would have provided a public benefit instead of a benefit limited to the private owners of solar panels. I mean, I can guess why, but I'm wondering if there's a good reason, as opposed to the ones which immediately spring to mind.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram