- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Retirement nest egg - rethinking 4% rule, size of treasure chest we leave to descendants
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:43 pm to Artificial Ignorance
Posted on 9/10/25 at 6:43 pm to Artificial Ignorance
That's right, annual limit just triggers reporting and counts against your lifetime tax free estate.
You can also avoid capital gains tax by gifting appreciated shares instead of cash when recipient is in low enough bracket for zero LTCG rate. They can immediately sell and spend $ or reinvest w higher basis, fund Roth IRA etc ...
You can also avoid capital gains tax by gifting appreciated shares instead of cash when recipient is in low enough bracket for zero LTCG rate. They can immediately sell and spend $ or reinvest w higher basis, fund Roth IRA etc ...
Posted on 9/11/25 at 4:55 am to KajunLass
quote:
Have you thought about long term care insurance? My husband and I each bought a policy when I retired (he had retired a few years before). Benefits are available immediately if need be (the benefits are higher the longer we wait to tap into each policy, of course). I smile every time I see the policy. Gives me a great sense of security
Money is difficult to access fully. They piecemeal it out. My dad has an excellent policy that has a cash value of over $350k. He’s in assisted living at @8k a month. Getting the money out is difficult, too many qualifiers. To fully access money, you literally need to be in a vegetative state, incapable of any self function.
Fortunately he has more income than costs, so it is not needed, but even with him on hospice, they aren’t paying out much.
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 5:01 am
Posted on 9/11/25 at 9:32 pm to Artificial Ignorance
I’m out next year as well 65yo. Our plan is to spend 30% of our 1.5 mil in next 10 years. Really can’t see me traveling and fighting the shite much after that. We have zero descendants to leave anything to. And will be 4K Mth in SS May go more crazy than that.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 12:27 pm to redfish99
This is part of the reason I'm getting out early. I don't want to leave a whole lot plus if given the chance I want to filled enjoy the last quarter of life.
Posted on 9/12/25 at 12:32 pm to JL
quote:
Of course, it's just a philosophy. There is a book called "Die with Zero" some people are following that for retirement.
It must be nice to live during the golden age of America and check out once the dark age hits
Posted on 9/13/25 at 12:12 am to kaaj24
quote:I’ve heard retirement planners break activity levels (and attendant costs) in retirement down like this:
My approach will be to spend more early while have health and desire to do things.
Most 80 and 90 year olds have more chill.
50-something to early 70s is go-go-go and is costly
Mid 70s to early 80s is slow-slow-slow and is less costly
Mid 80s & on is no-no-no and is even less costly
Obviously this is a generalization and precludes major health or mobility issues.
Posted on 9/13/25 at 8:40 am to Athanatos
quote:
I can’t think of anything more impactful than paying for school, especially college. The return on investment and quality of life will pay dividends for the rest of the beneficiary’s life.
How someone is going to gain marketable skills is the best ROI I can imagine. My schooling has and will pay back an absurdly high multiple of return.
This post was edited on 9/13/25 at 8:41 am
Posted on 9/13/25 at 8:42 am to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Some don't want to create spoiled trust fund kids
This has more to do with how someone is raising kids than a sum of money leftover.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:43 am to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
Retiring at 55yo.
Expecting 30yr retirement.
Planning for 40yr retirement.
I retired 5 years ago at 54. I didn't use the 4% rule. I used the idea that if I needed 100k/year how long can I live. So at 54 I had just over forty years in investments/savings. What put me over the edge was a life insurance payout for my deceased wife. While the payday was nice I don't recommend it for anyone.
I had a high school senior and a sophomore at the time. College was taken care of by funding their 529's early on.
So five years in I found that I didn't spend 100k. Maybe 60k per year. Thanks to the market I now have almost 60 years in the nest egg. Even if I die a very expensive death, my boys will get a pretty nice inheritance.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 11:28 am to NBR_Exile
So sorry to hear about the loss of your wife. Time so precious! Nice reminder.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 11:40 am to Artificial Ignorance
quote:
So sorry to hear about the loss of your wife. Time so precious! Nice reminder.
Thanks. It wasn't unexpected but still was a shock. Retirement seems daunting but it really depends on what you have in the bank. Good luck.
ETA:
The 4% does work. If you are invested, even conservatively, you can return about 6%. So living in retirement should be accretive as long as you keep expenses low.
This post was edited on 9/15/25 at 11:49 am
Posted on 9/15/25 at 4:10 pm to Artificial Ignorance
Most recent recommendation is 4.7%. Roth conversions definitely.
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:02 pm to bigjoe1
quote:
One thing I'd suggest is you and your wife take really good care of yourselves Join a gym and lift weights and get some cardio in on a regular basis..
This can’t be overstated. I’m doing what I can, but the wife does nothing. I keep telling her that all the shite she takes for granted will be infinitely more difficult in another 10-20 years, but she just doesn’t listen.
Popular
Back to top


0






