Started By
Message

re: Minimum Wage - Change my mind, or point me somewhere that can

Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:45 pm to
Posted by bod312
Member since Jul 2015
846 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

The biggest thing I see here is it hasn’t been touched in over 10 years so it hasn’t even kept up with inflation.


I agree that it should increase every year with inflation. The issue is that $7.25 in 2007 is about $9.1 today, no where near $15. The same thing happened last increase in min wage (jumped up above what the inflation adjusted equivalent would be).
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Nguyener


Need to make shareable, because I'm reposting that shite!
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

government suddenly raised the minimum wage to $15.



will never happen but the fear mongering has been pretty amusing

and all likelihood something like florida is doing with mw will be standardized across the country.

Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3662 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

How are taxpayers subsidizing things for execs


Please forgive the simplistic example...and feel free to poke holes. As I said, I'm trying to process personal values vs. practical application.

If Mr. Dingle, as the CEO of XYZ Corp has an annual salary of 5mil.
There are 50 employees of XYZ corp dependent on the federal government's SNAP program for food assistance.
Why should taxpayers foot the bill for those employee's food stamps? Couldn't/shouldn't the business pay a more fair wage as opposed to taxpayers enabling (subsidizing) what might be considered a socially irresponsible business plan, which then enables that 5mil salary, which enables that CEO to purchase his 3 vacation homes???
Posted by Tigers13
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2005
1753 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

If Mr. Dingle, as the CEO of XYZ Corp has an annual salary of 5mil.
There are 50 employees of XYZ corp dependent on the federal government's SNAP program for food assistance.
Why should taxpayers foot the bill for those employee's food stamps? Couldn't/shouldn't the business pay a more fair wage as opposed to taxpayers enabling (subsidizing) what might be considered a socially irresponsible business plan, which then enables that 5mil salary, which enables that CEO to purchase his 3 vacation homes??


That's actually the first reasonable argument I've heard that's pro min wage increase. Problem is, the one size fits all aspect to it. You have small town local businesses that are going to have to double their operating cost and they don't have the margins to do it. Obviously the business owner isn't pulling in absurd profits like the CEO in your example but both are very real situations.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:39 pm to
What happens to the local guy who makes $100,000 a year as an owner and can’t afford to double pay of his employees?
Posted by GeauxPack81
Member since Dec 2009
10479 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Nguyener


Everything you said is accurate. Just want to comment on this:

quote:

Parking lot attendant: fired
1 cashier: fired
2 cashier: $15 per hour
1: customer service cashier: $15 an hour
1: Floor manager: $20 per hour

While that looks like raises on paper you have to view it in reality:

I fired two employees and the employees I kept actually got a pay decrease relative to minimum wage instead of the great money they were making and that hurts in the long run as the economy inflates to meet the difference.


This is exactly what would happen. However, (and this isn't necessarily directed towards you, but the majority of posters in this thread) the argument for minimum wage isn't necessarily that everyone would be better off. The argument is that some would be better off and better contributors to society when they are making decent money. Undoubtedly there would be massive layoffs because simply, some people are not worth more than $7.25/hr. However, just like in your scenario, 4 people would get raises and are much better off.

Now I am not advocating for raising the federal minimum wage. I think cost of living should come into play, $15 is an absurd number in Hammond, LA, but in San Francisco its probably about right. Reality is that the market for minimum wage labor is not as efficient as it should be because people aren't moving to cheaper COL areas where they would be better off... It also bothers me that a large majority of the people that are in favor of increasing it are those that stand to directly benefit from it. Or even worse, those that think they stand to benefit from it, and don't realize they would be fired immediately.

I just figured I would say something because there is far too much disinformation about the topic. There would not be rampant inflation. The cost would not just be passed onto the consumers and now everything is $5 more expensive. I feel like I see that type of stuff all the time.

Posted by jfw3535
South of Bunkie
Member since Mar 2008
4643 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:47 pm to
My position when discussing the minimum wage with people who support raising it and talk to me about making a "living wage" is to say, "What grown-arse adult is still only making the minimum wage and trying to live on it??" Seriously? How horrible are you at your job and completely unskilled and unmotivated to learn a skill or trade do you have to be to only be making the minimum wage? Hell, even as a 16 year old kid working as a bagboy in a grocery store (back when they still had that role), I got 3 raises and a promotion to a cashier over the 2 years I worked there before going to college. By the time I was 17, I had already left the minimum wage in the rear view window. So if you're a grown-arse adult still making minimum wage to survive, perhaps it's time to seriously sit down and reevaluate your life choices.
Posted by Styxion
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2012
1596 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

4 people would get raises and are much better off.


Yes, they would get raises but are they really better off. 2 cashiers now have to do the work of 3 and someone has to cover the work the parking lot attendant was doing. Financially they would be better off, but they will eventually be stressed by the extra work.
Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3662 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Problem is, the one size fits all aspect to it


I agree 100%.

Thats my whole problem with this whole deal.

But....is there a way to make it work for everyone?
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

What grown-arse adult is still only making the minimum wage and trying to live on it??" Seriously? How horrible are you at your job and completely unskilled and unmotivated to learn a skill or trade do you have to be to only be making the minimum wage?


the problem with that argument is we still need people to do the shite work

garbage men. gas station clerks. grocery baggers are all essential jobs for a functioning society...
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8322 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:54 pm to
Just for a reference point, the highest the minimum wage has ever been in inflation-adjusted dollars is the current equivalent of just under $12 in the late 60s. So a $15 minimum wage represents a 25% increase over the highest all time high minimum.
Posted by bod312
Member since Jul 2015
846 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

what might be considered a socially irresponsible business plan


The goal of the company is to increase shareholder value. It isn't a charity although good will does have a certain return. Why should shareholders be responsible for overpaying someone versus the value returned? Would you rather the workers be let go in favor of automation and be even more reliant on the government?

The practical reason is that the company will either cut the jobs or pass the cost to the consumer. Happy meals are now $15 and the same person making $7.25 who had to work .75 hours for 1 happy meal now has to work 1 hour for that happy meal.

Increasing min wage does 2 things. It hurts small businesses and causes wage compression thus negatively impacting the spending power of the middle class.

So the government isn't actually subsidizing the CEO's vacation home. The government is subsidizing the middle class by mitigating (to an extent) inflation as well as mitigating even more government assistance by keeping workers employed. Imagine being in the middle class and losing your lifestyle to inflation and then having a tax increase due to the even more people reliant on government assistance. It sounds like they might be helping the states out since the states run unemployment.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

gas station clerks. grocery baggers
Doesnt have to be performed by full time workers
Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3662 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

bod312


I don't totally disagree with you, and I appreciate your input on this.

I think federal anything is almost always a bad idea, but especially like one poster said regarding $15 minimum wage - there is a significant difference in what 15 does in Houma vs. SanFran.

I'm leaning toward being pretty comfortable with the thought that the answer really lies somewhere along the lines of a localized minimum wage that takes into account the specific costs of living, and that pays a livable wage. $7.25 is probably not a livable wage for a single (not married) person anywhere, but it definitely doesn't take 15. PERSONALLY, I would want it set at a livable, but not comfortable level. You absolutely cannot remove a person's motivation/need/desire to improve and grow. We've done far more than enough of that already.
This post was edited on 1/21/21 at 2:12 pm
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 2:15 pm to
How about looking up evidence from places that have already increase the minimum wage and seeing the impact.

Or you can read some moron post a made up story about a grocery store as evidence.
Posted by bod312
Member since Jul 2015
846 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

I think federal anything is almost always a bad idea


quote:

Houma vs. SanFran


What about San Fran vs rural Cali? I agree most approaches to government are way too broad and federal min wage is no different. Even at a state level it is generally a poor grouping. Is the cost of living the same in Manhattan versus upstate? Rural Cali versus San Fran?
This post was edited on 1/21/21 at 2:30 pm
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25552 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 2:51 pm to
Minimum wage should be abolished.

If someone wants to pick grapes for $5 per hour, it shouldnt be illegal.

Forcing jobs off the books is not a solution to labor.

No one is forced into a minimum wage job. As a matter of fact, very few employers start out at minimum wage. The idea that this will save anyone from poverty is laughable.
Individuals know how much they can make to take advantage of earned income credits and welfare benefits (too much pay and the free shite goes away).
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37024 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

My personal opinion is that no one working a full-time job should be below the poverty line or reliant on government subsidy - that to me is a failing.


No one working a full time job, should be at a skill level that only pays a minimum wage.

That's the thing that gets lost in this debate. Few people actually make min wage, and of those that do, even fewer are trying to support themselves, much less a family.

If you are an adult trying to support a family, and your skill level is such that you can't command $15 an hour or more... yes it is a failure, and that failure isn't going to be cured by just giving someone more money.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37024 posts
Posted on 1/21/21 at 3:47 pm to
Here's the thing, Jim.

Those that support this $15 min wage, believe that the money will simply come out of corporate earnings / exec earnings.

So if company is making 1B in profit now, and these changes are made, then they will just make 5M in profit after, and that's enough, and that's how this will work.

The problem is, that's not how it works. Companies will cut employees, add tech, and do other things to keep the profit at 1B.

But the people pushing these policies don't understand that.

I will say one thing. We have created a society that, compared to say 50 years ago, cares a lot less about their employees now. That change in mindset wasn't caused by government action, and government action won't reverse it.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram