- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:24 pm to GVT
So close to breaking back even. I've only got about 5k shares but I still want in on the yacht parties
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:33 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
Rex, you can bring a single bottle of kristal for our party
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:38 pm to Pendulum
quote:
We should pick a day in the future and everyone create sell orders for like 30k shares within a couple of hours. See what happens.
Aaaaaand that guy’s brokerage account is now being watched
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:41 pm to GVT
quote:
TD, all those softies who listened to I isn't invited to our party!
Truth!
I’m kind of surprised at the sense of panic that has prevailed.
Since this thread first started, there have been 2 misses.
First, I was wrong thinking we’d make another decent run on the Jan. 18 Paso Robles news. Another poster even suggested that the news was already built into the price since it was known, and that poster was right. We did get a few runs from .03 to .0375 in January, but not what I expected. We reached the point where revenues will likely be the primary catalyst for any significant runs. Though I wouldn’t rule out a decent boost when Paso Robles gets the state license if the buildout has shown significant progress at that point.
Second, the uplist didn’t happen when it should have. I still think it happens before too long, and I think the press releases will increase substantially when it does.
But pretty much everything that has been talked about since day 1 is coming to fruition. The company’s plans are proceeding as we had all hoped. I don’t understand why so many people are ready to ditch when they get back to even or a small profit. We’ve always talked about the end of the summer being a reasonable timeframe to see significant progress, i.e. Coachella cranking out good revenues and Paso Robles up and running. Nothing has changed. If people are going to bail out before then, I don’t understand why they bought in the first place.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:49 pm to TigrrrDad
Well, Tigerrr like I said, I have about 100k shares now I’m going to try and flip as much as I can. When those particular shares reach 50% profit, sell, buy back in on the dip
Posted on 3/20/19 at 4:58 pm to rowbear1922
Nothing wrong with that, and I may do the same. I got up to 500K so I’d have plenty wiggle room. I’d be happy to flip some and be riding 350,000 freebies into the sunset.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 5:09 pm to TigrrrDad
I’m somewhat ignorant to penny stock/small company investing. All my prior stock investments have been in more matire companies.
What is the risk of a company like this just....... poof..... all investment, no matter how big is gone. Totally out. ?
What is the risk of a company like this just....... poof..... all investment, no matter how big is gone. Totally out. ?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 5:17 pm to rowbear1922
I went from being down over $2,000 to only down $400 today on 300,000 LVVV shares.
I had a buy set at 200,000 shares at 0.018 but part of me hopes it only goes up from here.
I had a buy set at 200,000 shares at 0.018 but part of me hopes it only goes up from here.
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 3/20/19 at 5:21 pm to Blackfield
quote:
What is the risk of a company like this just....... poof..... all investment, no matter how big is gone. Totally out. ?
I invested in one other penny stock in my lifetime (around 15 years ago) - a gold company my uncle had the inside track on. He had hit on a couple that made him hundreds of thousands.
I put $800 in and it tripled in short time. He said it would go up 10x that. I still have it. It’s worth a nickel. Not per share. A nickel. Total.
ETA: So the moral is that there is very little chance your whole investment will be gone. Even on bad hits, you’ll probably still have a nickel.
This post was edited on 3/20/19 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 3/20/19 at 6:44 pm to GVT
quote:
TD, all those softies who listened to Ignoramus isn't invited to our party!
LOL taking a victory lap at sub $.03!
Again, as childish as the name calling gets, I still wish you all the best.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 7:35 pm to TigrrrDad
What’s the production rates on their pods? I can’t see it on the website.
The hemp cbd market also needs female plants only and planting at acreage is a lot of clones.
The hemp cbd market also needs female plants only and planting at acreage is a lot of clones.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 9:32 pm to TigrrrDad
you hear about the pancake mix in a can?
Posted on 3/20/19 at 10:38 pm to eng08
One pod can hold up to 16,000 clones. It was in one of their videos last year. A pod is somewhere around 320 sq. ft. The Paso Robles nursery will have 10,600 sq. ft. of nursery space (plus the option to use at least one additional building on site). Huge potential if they can maximize output AND make the sales.
Posted on 3/20/19 at 11:07 pm to TigrrrDad
So here is a question for the longs - and I am not trying to put it down or anything like that - I am truly trying to understand the position.
The Company has a market cap of $30 million which clearly is based off the potential of the Coachella and Paso Robles properties and the long position is those are truly not fully valued in the stock price. Once there are revenues, the market capitalization will sky rocket.
Here is what I struggle with, and I will use Paso Robles as an example - here are the applications for licenses LINK If you look there are literally over a hundred of them, the vast majority of which are planning sited dramatically bigger then that of LVVV.
Note: LVVV's application is for only 5,000 sq feet and when you read it states they will use pods which seems completely different then what they are saying now - not sure how much the county actually focuses on what that application says.
But either way, is the position of the longs that these licensees are all going to be worth hundreds of millions or is it just that Bill knows the industry better then them and can do so much more with less space (it is not like the pods are a secret or proprietary to LVVV). Again, not flaming, but it sure looks like there are scores of much larger projects in play and if LVVVs play is woefully under appreciated then what does that say about these others.
Note: Coachella is not much different - I didn't see an updated link to their current applications, their website link shows those through Nov 2017 which predates GHC's application.
Again, not trying to flame - just trying to understand
The Company has a market cap of $30 million which clearly is based off the potential of the Coachella and Paso Robles properties and the long position is those are truly not fully valued in the stock price. Once there are revenues, the market capitalization will sky rocket.
Here is what I struggle with, and I will use Paso Robles as an example - here are the applications for licenses LINK If you look there are literally over a hundred of them, the vast majority of which are planning sited dramatically bigger then that of LVVV.
Note: LVVV's application is for only 5,000 sq feet and when you read it states they will use pods which seems completely different then what they are saying now - not sure how much the county actually focuses on what that application says.
But either way, is the position of the longs that these licensees are all going to be worth hundreds of millions or is it just that Bill knows the industry better then them and can do so much more with less space (it is not like the pods are a secret or proprietary to LVVV). Again, not flaming, but it sure looks like there are scores of much larger projects in play and if LVVVs play is woefully under appreciated then what does that say about these others.
Note: Coachella is not much different - I didn't see an updated link to their current applications, their website link shows those through Nov 2017 which predates GHC's application.
Again, not trying to flame - just trying to understand
Posted on 3/21/19 at 12:15 am to igoringa
after reading through most of the thread, what would you choose as a stock right now? getting in late....
Posted on 3/21/19 at 7:33 am to igoringa
Igoringa, I think it's because LVVV is trying to be more like Montasano than your average Joe farmer. They aren't growing the plants to harvest, they are the ones making the seeds. The smaller space makes sense from a cost perspective for that type of operation.
I think, but I'm not sure, that many of the other applicants are more of a seed to store type operation.
I think, but I'm not sure, that many of the other applicants are more of a seed to store type operation.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 7:48 am to BitBuster
That’s my understanding as well - if you are a grower you can either plant seeds or buy clones (which can help qc your output ).
Lvvv is selling the baby plants with a goal of becoming a key supplier. If they can sell a baby plant for less than it costs to raise one (which takes time and space up in the big growers greenhouse) then they have it made.
They seem to be a startup Bonnie plants
Lvvv is selling the baby plants with a goal of becoming a key supplier. If they can sell a baby plant for less than it costs to raise one (which takes time and space up in the big growers greenhouse) then they have it made.
They seem to be a startup Bonnie plants
Posted on 3/21/19 at 9:49 am to BitBuster
quote:
Igoringa, I think it's because LVVV is trying to be more like Montasano than your average Joe farmer. They aren't growing the plants to harvest, they are the ones making the seeds. The smaller space makes sense from a cost perspective for that type of operation.
Sure but Monsanto has spent billions in R&D developing the seed. Livewire woke up 2 years ago and decided to do it with no known R&D and no reasonable basis of funding. Yes, they brought in Kyle who worked at a former clone shop that basically seems to not exist anymore. What is the secret sauce? Why would other parties spend so much more, to develop so much more land if there is better money simply selling clones in a device made by another penny stock.
One other follow up, I previously displayed skepticism with press releases such as the 'we will use blockchain now run by X who is a blockchain expert'. But when you research the guy, there is very very little out there at all on this reknowned expert. Now this thing yesterday - again not flaming - but can anyone find anything on these two guys? For purported major players with RVR (which was a legit company) and OP distro (no idea as I don't see anything on this company), I cant find anything on these guys. I mean distribution and relationship guys tend to live on linkedin, articles, promotions etc... I cant find anything on either. A random article by maybe's Jerry's wife is all I could see. Also - note the press release says they 'contracted with them'. That seems like nothing but that is significant to me based off my understanding of micros (but not relevant to my question). Any info on these guys would be appreciated. And before anyone starts huffing, I am not saying they don't exist or anything - just trying to figure out what made them press release worthy.
Posted on 3/21/19 at 10:01 am to igoringa
Igoringa, the way I justify not hearing of these guys is that weed is still federally illegal. How do these guys pay their federal income tax? I chalk it up to just keeping a low profile. The Canadian guys can be much more open about it.
I know it sounds like I'm making excuses, but your questions are very valid.
The reason why a lot of this seems so shady is because they are walking a tightrope just keeping everything legal.
I know it sounds like I'm making excuses, but your questions are very valid.
The reason why a lot of this seems so shady is because they are walking a tightrope just keeping everything legal.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News