- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is it time to short NVDA ?
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:04 pm
Asking for a friend
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:18 pm to Gumbo Gary
NVDA is not exactly expensive compared to historical valuations. Short it at your own peril.
SMCI, on the other hand, is woefully overvalued, but has still gone up 70% in the last 2 weeks. Tough to short without some serious downward pressure though as it’s in la la land.
SMCI, on the other hand, is woefully overvalued, but has still gone up 70% in the last 2 weeks. Tough to short without some serious downward pressure though as it’s in la la land.
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:18 pm to Gumbo Gary
My EJ account had this to say
quote:
Key Developments
11/22/23: We are downgrading shares of
NVIDIA to a Hold from a Buy and removing it
from the Stock Focus List. While we cannot
deny NVIDIA has the best growth story
within technology, we think expectations
have finally begun to catch up to the stock.
The company will likely remain the pinnacle
of the current generative-AI boom due to
a lack of alternatives for the company's
chips. However, with exceptionally strong
demand, significant market share, and no real
alternatives for its products, we believe the
company is experiencing peak demand. In
our view, this will make it more challenging
for the company to continually outpace
expectations and drive the stock meaningfully
higher. We believe NVIDIA's positioning in
and dominance of AI chip markets is well
understood by the market at this point. We
continue to feel comfortable with long-term
investors holding NVDA shares within a
diversified portfolio. However, near-term
expectations are very high. As a result, we
are reluctant to recommend that investors add
to positions at this time.
Here is what happened since they downgraded to HOLD
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:31 pm to DarthRebel
Investor on CNBC said that NVDA reminds him of CSCO in 1999/2000.
Said the rhetoric was the same, that it was a can't lose no brainer that would go up every day & everyone acted like it was normal, until it wasn't.
CSCO is still below its 2000 high.
Said the rhetoric was the same, that it was a can't lose no brainer that would go up every day & everyone acted like it was normal, until it wasn't.
CSCO is still below its 2000 high.
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:42 pm to Gumbo Gary
quote:
Investor on CNBC said that NVDA reminds him of CSCO in 1999/2000
I do not think I would trust someone using an example from a quarter century ago.
The market and the way it reacts has changed just a little since then.
Short it all you want. I would not short a leading AI stock though, until something negative slows down that sector. AI growth has just started, IMO.
Slackster is right about SMCI, it is up 800+% over the last 12 months. It is overvalued, but I would still not short that either. It is in lala land and may pop for 20% gain for no damn reason.
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:52 pm to slackster
Fill me in. How is it not expensive when looking at it’s PE ratio?
It’s gone parabolic and everyone in their brother is talking about it.
Love the company and I am big on AI but these valuations are in space
It’s gone parabolic and everyone in their brother is talking about it.
Love the company and I am big on AI but these valuations are in space
Posted on 2/14/24 at 7:06 pm to Gumbo Gary
You don't bet against a winner that's on a win streak. Just IMHO.
Posted on 2/14/24 at 7:15 pm to DarthRebel
quote:
Here is what happened since they downgraded to HOLD
To be fair, they were at a buy since 3/13/20 and it was up nearly 900% in 42 months.
But yeah, that Hold looked smart as NVDA lagged the broad rally to end 2023, and has looked foolish for 2024.
Posted on 2/14/24 at 7:20 pm to I Love Bama
quote:
Fill me in. How is it not expensive when looking at it’s PE ratio?
It’s trading around a 35x forward PE. The 5yr average forward PE is 42x. You’re paying less for future earnings now than you have on average for the past 5 years.
Posted on 2/14/24 at 10:40 pm to Gumbo Gary
Yea go ahead and short it and let us know how it turns out. Earnings are next week but go ahead and short it.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 4:38 am to slackster
quote:
It’s trading around a 35x forward PE. The 5yr average forward PE is 42x. You’re paying less for future earnings now than you have on average for the past 5 years.
Made up metric. Yes- people use it, but it implies you have a crystal ball and know what earnings will be. It’s literally just a consensus guess for the growth of earnings. Sure, it’s an educated guess from teams of WS analysts but even they get it wrong. A lot. And none of them would ever be overly optimistic, right? Then comparing forward PE between company x and y is assuming the methodology used to derive each projection was the same and accurate.
Can you tell I hate forward PE?
That said, I would not advocate shorting either. You know, irrational > solvent… maybe if you bought time very far out, but the premium on that is probably expensive and not worth it anyway. Someone will time this bubble popping but majority will lose.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 6:42 am to TigerDeBaiter
quote:
Yes- people use it, but it implies you have a crystal ball and know what earnings will be. It’s literally just a consensus guess for the growth of earnings. Sure, it’s an educated guess from teams of WS analysts but even they get it wrong. A lot. And none of them would ever be overly optimistic, right? Then comparing forward PE between company x and y is assuming the methodology used to derive each projection was the same and accurate.
the company itself issues guidance too.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 6:52 am to Double Oh
quote:
Yea go ahead and short it and let us know how it turns out. Earnings are next week but go ahead and short it.
Considering the run that the stock has been on, I would be just as nervous to be long going into earnings as I would to be short going into earnings.
If they disappoint, or more importantly give weaker than expected guidance, look out below.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 8:05 am to Gumbo Gary
quote:
If they disappoint, or more importantly give weaker than expected guidance, look out below.
You may be right. So to short NVDA, what method would you use, a straight short (borrowing shares) or using an options strategy? Do you have experience in utilizing either or both?
Posted on 2/15/24 at 8:10 am to Jag_Warrior
quote:
You may be right. So to short NVDA, what method would you use, a straight short (borrowing shares) or using an options strategy? Do you have experience in utilizing either or both?
NVDS is an easy way to short.
1.25 weighted short.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 8:50 am to LordSaintly
You don't bet against a winner that's on a win streak. Just IMHO.
____________________
This. I added a little NVDA this week. They are dominant with their product. The run will end at some point, but their financials and product dominance have room to run. Not expecting the growth rate to stay as hot as it has been, but it will grow this year. I will be happy if it only grows 10% over the next year.
____________________
This. I added a little NVDA this week. They are dominant with their product. The run will end at some point, but their financials and product dominance have room to run. Not expecting the growth rate to stay as hot as it has been, but it will grow this year. I will be happy if it only grows 10% over the next year.
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:56 am to Gumbo Gary
quote:
Investor on CNBC said that NVDA reminds him of CSCO in 1999/2000. Said the rhetoric was the same, that it was a can't lose no brainer that would go up every day & everyone acted like it was normal, until it wasn't. CSCO is still below its 2000 high.
Except NVDA is one of the largest revenue generating companies in the history of the US. CISCO grew revenue from $2 billion to $19 billion, but its stock surged 3800% and had a PE of 230+. NVDA started with a much more sound fundamental base. Nvidia’s GPUs inherently have shorter useful lives than Cisco’s networking gear, which reduces the likelihood of overbuilding. The CNBC talking head misses this point. Nvidia has a quasi-monopoly position in the AI space, allowing for very healthy margins.
This tech rally is so fundamentally different than 1999/2000 that anyone comparing the two is, so misguided or misinformed that it is comical. The companies on this run have well defined business models, massive revenue and massive profit.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News