Started By
Message

Is it time to short NVDA ?

Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:04 pm
Posted by Gumbo Gary
Member since Feb 2024
61 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:04 pm
Asking for a friend
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16160 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:10 pm to
You first
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84752 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:18 pm to
NVDA is not exactly expensive compared to historical valuations. Short it at your own peril.

SMCI, on the other hand, is woefully overvalued, but has still gone up 70% in the last 2 weeks. Tough to short without some serious downward pressure though as it’s in la la land.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21233 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:18 pm to


My EJ account had this to say
quote:


Key Developments
11/22/23: We are downgrading shares of
NVIDIA to a Hold from a Buy and removing it
from the Stock Focus List. While we cannot
deny NVIDIA has the best growth story
within technology, we think expectations
have finally begun to catch up to the stock.
The company will likely remain the pinnacle
of the current generative-AI boom due to
a lack of alternatives for the company's
chips. However, with exceptionally strong
demand, significant market share, and no real
alternatives for its products, we believe the
company is experiencing peak demand. In
our view, this will make it more challenging
for the company to continually outpace
expectations and drive the stock meaningfully
higher. We believe NVIDIA's positioning in
and dominance of AI chip markets is well
understood by the market at this point. We
continue to feel comfortable with long-term
investors holding NVDA shares within a
diversified portfolio. However, near-term
expectations are very high. As a result, we
are reluctant to recommend that investors add
to positions at this time.


Here is what happened since they downgraded to HOLD

Posted by Gumbo Gary
Member since Feb 2024
61 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:31 pm to
Investor on CNBC said that NVDA reminds him of CSCO in 1999/2000.
Said the rhetoric was the same, that it was a can't lose no brainer that would go up every day & everyone acted like it was normal, until it wasn't.
CSCO is still below its 2000 high.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21233 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Investor on CNBC said that NVDA reminds him of CSCO in 1999/2000


I do not think I would trust someone using an example from a quarter century ago.

The market and the way it reacts has changed just a little since then.

Short it all you want. I would not short a leading AI stock though, until something negative slows down that sector. AI growth has just started, IMO.

Slackster is right about SMCI, it is up 800+% over the last 12 months. It is overvalued, but I would still not short that either. It is in lala land and may pop for 20% gain for no damn reason.
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
37695 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 6:52 pm to
Fill me in. How is it not expensive when looking at it’s PE ratio?

It’s gone parabolic and everyone in their brother is talking about it.

Love the company and I am big on AI but these valuations are in space
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
38863 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 7:06 pm to
You don't bet against a winner that's on a win streak. Just IMHO.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84752 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

Here is what happened since they downgraded to HOLD


To be fair, they were at a buy since 3/13/20 and it was up nearly 900% in 42 months.

But yeah, that Hold looked smart as NVDA lagged the broad rally to end 2023, and has looked foolish for 2024.
Posted by kaaj24
Dallas
Member since Jan 2010
604 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 7:16 pm to
Heck no
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84752 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Fill me in. How is it not expensive when looking at it’s PE ratio?


It’s trading around a 35x forward PE. The 5yr average forward PE is 42x. You’re paying less for future earnings now than you have on average for the past 5 years.
Posted by Double Oh
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
17767 posts
Posted on 2/14/24 at 10:40 pm to
Yea go ahead and short it and let us know how it turns out. Earnings are next week but go ahead and short it.
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10258 posts
Posted on 2/15/24 at 4:38 am to
quote:

It’s trading around a 35x forward PE. The 5yr average forward PE is 42x. You’re paying less for future earnings now than you have on average for the past 5 years.


Made up metric. Yes- people use it, but it implies you have a crystal ball and know what earnings will be. It’s literally just a consensus guess for the growth of earnings. Sure, it’s an educated guess from teams of WS analysts but even they get it wrong. A lot. And none of them would ever be overly optimistic, right? Then comparing forward PE between company x and y is assuming the methodology used to derive each projection was the same and accurate.

Can you tell I hate forward PE?

That said, I would not advocate shorting either. You know, irrational > solvent… maybe if you bought time very far out, but the premium on that is probably expensive and not worth it anyway. Someone will time this bubble popping but majority will lose.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84752 posts
Posted on 2/15/24 at 6:42 am to
quote:

Yes- people use it, but it implies you have a crystal ball and know what earnings will be. It’s literally just a consensus guess for the growth of earnings. Sure, it’s an educated guess from teams of WS analysts but even they get it wrong. A lot. And none of them would ever be overly optimistic, right? Then comparing forward PE between company x and y is assuming the methodology used to derive each projection was the same and accurate.


the company itself issues guidance too.
Posted by Gumbo Gary
Member since Feb 2024
61 posts
Posted on 2/15/24 at 6:52 am to
quote:

Yea go ahead and short it and let us know how it turns out. Earnings are next week but go ahead and short it.


Considering the run that the stock has been on, I would be just as nervous to be long going into earnings as I would to be short going into earnings.
If they disappoint, or more importantly give weaker than expected guidance, look out below.
Posted by Jag_Warrior
Virginia
Member since May 2015
4083 posts
Posted on 2/15/24 at 8:05 am to
quote:

If they disappoint, or more importantly give weaker than expected guidance, look out below.


You may be right. So to short NVDA, what method would you use, a straight short (borrowing shares) or using an options strategy? Do you have experience in utilizing either or both?
Posted by Gumbo Gary
Member since Feb 2024
61 posts
Posted on 2/15/24 at 8:10 am to
quote:

You may be right. So to short NVDA, what method would you use, a straight short (borrowing shares) or using an options strategy? Do you have experience in utilizing either or both?


NVDS is an easy way to short.
1.25 weighted short.
Posted by Jag_Warrior
Virginia
Member since May 2015
4083 posts
Posted on 2/15/24 at 8:28 am to
Gotcha.
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
1129 posts
Posted on 2/15/24 at 8:50 am to
You don't bet against a winner that's on a win streak. Just IMHO.

____________________

This. I added a little NVDA this week. They are dominant with their product. The run will end at some point, but their financials and product dominance have room to run. Not expecting the growth rate to stay as hot as it has been, but it will grow this year. I will be happy if it only grows 10% over the next year.

Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
13616 posts
Posted on 2/15/24 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Investor on CNBC said that NVDA reminds him of CSCO in 1999/2000. Said the rhetoric was the same, that it was a can't lose no brainer that would go up every day & everyone acted like it was normal, until it wasn't. CSCO is still below its 2000 high.


Except NVDA is one of the largest revenue generating companies in the history of the US. CISCO grew revenue from $2 billion to $19 billion, but its stock surged 3800% and had a PE of 230+. NVDA started with a much more sound fundamental base. Nvidia’s GPUs inherently have shorter useful lives than Cisco’s networking gear, which reduces the likelihood of overbuilding. The CNBC talking head misses this point. Nvidia has a quasi-monopoly position in the AI space, allowing for very healthy margins.

This tech rally is so fundamentally different than 1999/2000 that anyone comparing the two is, so misguided or misinformed that it is comical. The companies on this run have well defined business models, massive revenue and massive profit.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram