Started By
Message

re: Is Google the most undervalued and disrespected company in the stock market today?

Posted on 6/22/25 at 10:27 am to
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52540 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 10:27 am to
quote:

This just isn’t true.


Good to know when we look a year from now that you don't think current regulations will be the reason they won't roll out faster
This post was edited on 6/22/25 at 10:28 am
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18407 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Good to know when we look a year from now that you don't think current regulations will be the reason they won't roll out faster


I would pity how misinformed you are but it seems deliberate and intentional.

ETA first reviews of robotaxi. So much for needing LIDAR. Good luck waymo.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Twitter Link

Twitter Link

Twitter Link
This post was edited on 6/22/25 at 3:24 pm
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18407 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 11:40 am to
quote:

This is why the antitrust stuff is silly. They buy/develop companies to avoid becoming obsolete. The government expects them to stay static and die. Plus, Google has Gemini which is no slouch in the AI world and some of the biggest content libraries to train AI. Youtube alone can make them billions annual from just licensing, if they want to share. I'm not arguing they're infallible or can't fall, but they're set up the best due to their heavy cross-platform investment and success. They're closer to the "all in one" solution that Elon is so obsessed over than Elon is


Google’s problem is they’ve tainted their data over the years with bloated adware and curation that focuses on ads, and in YouTube’s case, sponsors and ads. Look at Google search results and how precise you have to be with your filters, even then you don’t get the required output that you would’ve gotten a decade or so ago. Now Google searches end with “Reddit” but somehow Google has even managed to mess that up.They have messy data and it’s way past the point of starting from a place to filter all of that out.
Posted by The Scofflaw
Metairie, LA
Member since Sep 2014
1940 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 2:05 pm to
They're valued at $2T market cap. Hard to argue they're "undervalued" unless you trying to make a relative comparison.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 7:32 am to


Gemini summary:


quote:

The video features a discussion among four individuals—Thomas, Chamath, Jason, and Friedberg—about which companies are best positioned to achieve super intelligence or AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) within the next five years, essentially "winning the AI race" [00:04]. They each offer their top two picks and elaborate on their reasoning.

Here's a summary of each person's perspective:

Thomas's Picks:

Nvidia (Number 1): He believes Nvidia will remain dominant due to the continued reliance on GPUs for AI models, stating that "all roads still lead to the GPU" [00:28].

Tesla (Number 2 - Dark Horse): Thomas sees Tesla as having the most potential for vertical integration, from silicon to models and hardware, which could be crucial for applications beyond cars, like Optimus robots [00:40].

Chamath's Picks:

Tesla (Number 1): He argues Tesla has the closest thing to a vertically integrated stack, with strong vision models, upcoming LLMs with XAI, and the ability to integrate these with Dojo and physical AI like robots and robo-taxis [01:07].

Google (Number 2): Chamath highlights Google's Gemini family of models (including VO3, which he believes will "destroy Hollywood") [01:43], their TPUs, and their extensive user base across products like YouTube, Gmail, and Workspace, which allows them to pivot from a "price per click" to a "price per token" economic model [02:42].

Jason's Picks (Elon/Google):

Elon (Tesla/XAI) (Number 1): Jason believes Elon Musk is a "magnet for talent" [03:23] and points to the unique position of Colossus (XAI) and Tesla. He suggests that if Tesla (with its hardware, software, and FSD/Optimus applications) and XAI (with its real-time data from X/Twitter) were to merge, it would create an unstoppable force [04:11].

Google (Number 2): Jason agrees with the potential of Google's ad network to perform significantly better due to their vast data collection from user interactions across various Google products, even if search share declines [05:02].

Friedberg's Picks:

Tesla (Best Investment for New Industry): He sees Tesla as the best investment for a "massive new industry" [05:57] primarily due to the "mind-blowingly ginormous" humanoid robot opportunity, despite the premium valuation [06:05].

Nvidia (Most Protected, but with China Risk): Friedberg acknowledges Nvidia's durable business and strong moat [06:36] but points out a "low probability but very high severity risk to Nvidia in China" [06:42]. He cites China's advancements in semiconductor manufacturing and increasing investment in creating alternatives to US chip technology [06:48].

Google (Portfolio Solution/Overall Pick): Friedberg views Google as a diversified portfolio of "high beta bets" [08:42], including Waymo, quantum computing, and biologics work. He believes any one of these could result in a "trillion-dollar market cap outcome" [08:49] and credits Sundar Pichai for thoughtfully evolving the search product [09:21].

Revised Consensus (Ignoring Valuation for the "AI Prize"):

When pressed to clarify his top two solely based on "winning the AI prize" without considering valuation, Friedberg ultimately places Google as Number 1 and Tesla as Number 2 [10:16]. He emphasizes Google's depth of talent, comprehensive understanding of model development beyond LLMs (citing weather forecasting as an example) [10:55], and the potential for multi-model and agentic architectures to drive innovation across their product ecosystem [11:12].
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
8373 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:34 am to
quote:

I think people are waiting for some administration to come in and really go to war with google re: anti-trust, so some of that uncertainty gets priced in.



over 3/4 of Google's revenue comes from ads. We are rapidly approaching a world where "Google it" becomes "ask ChatGPT", "use Grok", etc. They will still have a piece of that pie with Gemini, but unless they can route the ads through that platform without making people want to use something else I think there is a case that trouble could be ahead. With the cost to operate these AI bots eventually there will be a consolidation down to 1 or 2 that everyone uses... I'm not sure that Gemini will be one of those 1 or 2 as of right now.

I am generally a pretty big fan of the company though. I just think there are existential questions that would give me some pause before investing significantly in it. And YouTube isn't going away.
This post was edited on 6/26/25 at 8:35 am
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26530 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:58 am to
In the early days of Google, they actually had customer service and tech support. For years now they only have crappy support by AI that is like a dog chasing its tail. Even their SEO partner companies can't reach an actual human to fix something the idiot AI screwed up.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 9:45 am to
quote:

over 3/4 of Google's revenue comes from ads. We are rapidly approaching a world where "Google it" becomes "ask ChatGPT", "use Grok", etc. They will still have a piece of that pie with Gemini, but unless they can route the ads through that platform without making people want to use something else I think there is a case that trouble could be ahead. With the cost to operate these AI bots eventually there will be a consolidation down to 1 or 2 that everyone uses... I'm not sure that Gemini will be one of those 1 or 2 as of right now.

Watch the video I just posted.

There is very little to base the eval that Gemini won't be one of the "surviving" AIs.

Gemini also has the 2nd most cash behind it to pay for whatever content library they would need to separate Gemini from the pack. Only Apple has more ability to pay for this, but their tech sucks. Apple is in trouble. Apple is going to have to join with MSFT or Google for this era. My bet is Google due to their close relationship (Google's search payment is like 5% of Apple's total revenue already). I know Apple has already done a thing with OpenAI/GhatGPT, but it's not perpetual and I think ChatGPT isn't going to ultimately be one of the surviving AIs.

It had the initial lead and notoriety (for conceptual branding) but it is going to be raped in litigation and licensing fees and has nothing behind it in terms of content. Other LLMs have already met/passed it (Gemini, Grok, etc.) with a lot more of a foundation both in content and company infrastructure.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
10189 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

I guarantee you that sans politics, Robotaxi will be in more cities and areas than Waymo by this time next year.





Oh, I shouldn't laugh. You own a Tesla so that makes you an expert on all things autonomous driving. Silly me.
Posted by rickgrimes
Member since Jan 2011
4340 posts
Posted on 9/20/25 at 6:32 pm to
Google is up 54% ($165-$255) since I made the OP
Posted by beaverfever
Arkansas
Member since Jan 2008
36192 posts
Posted on 9/20/25 at 10:27 pm to
Good call. I’ve always wondered why it didn’t get the respect that Apple or MSFT did. Apple would be the one I’d be discounting at this point if I had to pick.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
25828 posts
Posted on 9/20/25 at 10:58 pm to
Tesla will top Waymo, it is what it is.
Posted by KWL85
Member since Mar 2023
3784 posts
Posted on 9/21/25 at 9:34 am to
quote:

quote:
they have the issue that their dominant search engine is becoming obsolete due to AI.

This is the answer. AI is going to whip their heads off so quickly their search revenue model will be worthless unless they get it in gear. There's talk that whoever "gets it right" first will be the only player. No 2nd place trophy in this race.

EDIT for downvoters: The theory is that AI can reach escape velocity and hit general intelligence, reiterating itself ever smarter until no rival can catch up. There's a lot of speculation in there, but if that's the shape of the finish line then second place might not be a place at all. Sorry for being the messenger of this possible scenario.


They could end up being the winner. They are spending huge amounts on AI.
I like Goog at these prices.
Posted by Motownsix
NOLA
Member since Oct 2022
3274 posts
Posted on 9/21/25 at 1:40 pm to
I’ve always said that about Amazon.
Posted by Drizzt
Cimmeria
Member since Aug 2013
14891 posts
Posted on 9/21/25 at 6:13 pm to
The answer is ALOT of people think Google is just evil. They don’t have the PR of Apple or Facebook or the cool of Tesla. Google is like a more boring Microsoft.
Posted by beaverfever
Arkansas
Member since Jan 2008
36192 posts
Posted on 9/21/25 at 8:22 pm to
They also don’t have the name brand CEO that most mag 7 companies have.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram