Started By
Message

re: Holding AMC Thread- Diamond hands unite

Posted on 6/9/21 at 8:42 am to
Posted by AA7
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2009
27971 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 8:42 am to
Why’d you downvote me goose? I’m just a simple man with a call expiring Friday, trying to retire at an early age :(
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12767 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 8:51 am to
quote:

This is no bueno.

Thursday, June 3rd it fell to $42 at 11am. At 1:30pm, it was at $67. Friday June 4th, it again fell to $42. At the close it was at $51. Monday, it opened at $51, dropped to $47, and finished at $56.

We are supposed to get news today!



Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12767 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Why’d you downvote me goose? I’m just a simple man with a call expiring Friday, trying to retire at an early age :(

What? I deal out downvotes very sparingly. They are reserved for a limited few. I have no idea what you are talking about, but if your post was pro-AMC, I have a very good idea who did deal you the vote.
Posted by southpawcock
Member since Oct 2015
16060 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 8:54 am to
The last few days it’s climbed up until around 10 - noon then fallen towards close.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12767 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:00 am to
quote:

BAM still saying we are hitting 280 today?
Here's the latest from BAM's twitter. He's still very bullish:

[/img]
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34031 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:20 am to
quote:

greygoose


So you wanna talk about the Russell 1000 some more? Or should we put that conversation on hold for, say, 11 months?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89779 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:21 am to
quote:

So which are we getting? Both? After many searches I've found no information on how this alleged share count would actually work and how it would reveal information that is not captured elsewhere all along.



Already got share count- 501MM or so. Should get individual holders, which, by itself, tells us nothing. However, last time they stated what percentage of ownership those individuals had, which would be helpful. Institutional ownership is somewhere around 20-25%. Short interest estimates around 6/2 were 18-20%. If individuals own 80-100%, that would make sense. I don’t believe they separated insiders from the individual ownership statistic back in March, but I could be wrong.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89779 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Now let's talk charts. Bollinger bands have narrowed over the last few trading days, and if you don't know what that indicates, I'll help you out. That is a strong indication that price is about to increase.


I despise technical analysis for regular stocks, so I don’t think Bollinger bands or any technical analysis is remotely useful for meme stocks, but I could be wrong. Wouldn’t be the first time.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12767 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Already got share count- 501MM or so. Should get individual holders, which, by itself, tells us nothing. However, last time they stated what percentage of ownership those individuals had, which would be helpful. Institutional ownership is somewhere around 20-25%. Short interest estimates around 6/2 were 18-20%. If individuals own 80-100%, that would make sense. I don’t believe they separated insiders from the individual ownership statistic back in March, but I could be wrong.

It's not rocket science. TDA know how many shares I own. AMC knows how many shares have been issued. What happens when it is reported back to AMC that they have, say, 3 billion possible votes?

Another way to look at it, if there are 3 million individual stock holders, what would be the average amount of shares held by retail, if retail owns 80% of the shares? Does 150 shares sound low? It does to me!

501 million shares issued by the company. Retail owns 80%. That's 400 million shares.

400 million/ 3 million retail holders = 133 shares per shareholder.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12767 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:34 am to
quote:

I despise technical analysis for regular stocks, so I don’t think Bollinger bands or any technical analysis is remotely useful for meme stocks, but I could be wrong. Wouldn’t be the first time.
Have an upvote!

Tech analysis is just another tool in the tool box. You really want to get in the weeds, look into how BAM analysis works! But hey, it's hard to argue with it with the successful predictions.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34031 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:35 am to
quote:

hard to argue with it with the successful predictions.


Gonna be fun watching the run to $280 today then.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12767 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:35 am to
quote:

It's not rocket science. TDA know how many shares I own. AMC knows how many shares have been issued. What happens when it is reported back to AMC that they have, say, 3 billion possible votes?

Another way to look at it, if there are 3 million individual stock holders, what would be the average amount of shares held by retail, if retail owns 80% of the shares? Does 150 shares sound low? It does to me!

501 million shares issued by the company. Retail owns 80%. That's 400 million shares.

400 million/ 3 million retail holders = 133 shares per shareholder.
BTW, this is how I know Chitstain is a functional retard, everytime he posts his Debbie Downer crap about "share counts".
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34031 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:41 am to
You have no clue how your purported "share count" works. Its been abundantly clear. It will be a non-event. And yet another example of something you saw on Reddit, have no understanding of, and confidently post over here with a "GUYS, SHARE COUNT!!!"

So, about the Russell 1000...

And that BAM guy...on the predictions he ends up being right on, he's right 100% of the time!!!

ETA: I've completed my "Greyparrot AMC Lingo Bingo" card and will be playing today. I'll hopefully be back with a bingo soon. Starting after this post
This post was edited on 6/9/21 at 9:47 am
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12767 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 9:55 am to
Did you buy some more? I hope so!


[/img]
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89779 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Another way to look at it, if there are 3 million individual stock holders, what would be the average amount of shares held by retail, if retail owns 80% of the shares? Does 150 shares sound low? It does to me!

501 million shares issued by the company. Retail owns 80%. That's 400 million shares.

400 million/ 3 million retail holders = 133 shares per shareholder.


Then that’s that. I don’t see how you can argue with their numbers. If they say individuals own 80% of the shares again, then they own 400 million shares. It’s not like they’ll get 2 billion individual votes unless retail owns 400% of their outstanding shares.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12767 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Then that’s that. I don’t see how you can argue with their numbers. If they say individuals own 80% of the shares again, then they own 400 million shares. It’s not like they’ll get 2 billion individual votes unless retail owns 400% of their outstanding shares.


Sooooo......a shite ton of synthetics are out there!
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
12767 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 10:21 am to
quote:

Then that’s that. I don’t see how you can argue with their numbers. If they say individuals own 80% of the shares again, then they own 400 million shares. It’s not like they’ll get 2 billion individual votes unless retail owns 400% of their outstanding shares.
I get one vote for each share I own. All of this is reported back from the broker to the company, correct? If TDA, for example says I have 10000 shares, I get 10000 proxy votes. Now, if they add up all the retail votes they disperse, there's your share count.

This is akin to a nation dispersing 200 million ballots for an election, to a nation with only 100 million eligible voters.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34031 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Now, if they add up all the retail votes they disperse, there's your share count.


You do know that if they know how many people they're reaching out to, and how many shares/votes each person has...then there's no need for a share count since they've had the information they need to calculate it all along.

As I was saying, you have no clue what you're talking about, how it works, or what it's intended to do.

Using your mail in voting example, it's like saying "alright guys, we have a list of 100 million voters we need to send a ballot to."

*sends ballots to 100 million people*

"Ok, time for the count...how many people did we send ballots to?"

This post was edited on 6/9/21 at 10:33 am
Posted by MusclesofBrussels
Member since Dec 2015
4852 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 10:44 am to
I'm watching the superstonk livestream from the GME shareholder meeting and it's hilarious. Looks like a bunch of kids larping. "Giant110" was just walking through the parking lot in a disheveled suit looking for "bodysurfingdan".

Also, apparently there was no bomb dropped on share count and they are all disappointed. Claiming they won't believe the 8K filed with the SEC if it doesn't say more than 100% of shares voted.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
82807 posts
Posted on 6/9/21 at 10:46 am to
So based off the share count, there is no “bombshell” coming?

Now its just how long can retail keep this thing pumped?
Jump to page
Page First 193 194 195 196 197 ... 276
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 195 of 276Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram