- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Holding AMC Thread- Diamond hands unite
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:31 am to Upperdecker
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:31 am to Upperdecker
quote:
Wall Street guy
Exactly. These are the people that know best and have picked up the ball and ran with it after they seen the numbers and mountains of data.
2
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:33 am to CajunCraftsman225
A news anchor would not know about seedy wall st and hedge fund tactics. That’s absolutely not their job. These are things that are not told to the media and are covered up by the hedge funds and wall st, essentially conspiracy theory
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:33 am to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
quote:
Please note that fails-to-deliver can occur for a number of reasons on both long and short sales. Therefore, fails-to-deliver are not necessarily the result of short selling, and are not evidence of abusive short selling or “naked” short selling
Huge factor to comprehend. Options are legal contracts. FTDs turn into synthetics theoretically.
*** edited the feds typo to the FTDs portion that was intended.
This post was edited on 6/5/21 at 11:00 am
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:34 am to CajunCraftsman225
I agree, the Wall St professionals will have some knowledge of this stuff. But the Melissa Lee’s of the world will not
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:40 am to slackster
Trey’s Trades et al are in panic mode. Apparently consecutive down days are proof that apes are winning. 
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:42 am to Upperdecker
quote:
news anchor would not know
Normal news anchors would not,, correct.
But I will say it again. FINANCIAL news anchors should know basic trading theories. Quite literally their job is to be able to freely talk about the financial markets and current trading trends being futured on their programming.
This post was edited on 6/5/21 at 11:00 am
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:42 am to CajunCraftsman225
quote:
seen the numbers and mountains of data.
Lulz. Mountains of hopes. The entire theory is based around this idea that the data is wrong.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:59 am to ksayetiger
They are hoping Shareholders (you and I) will vote yes to allow for the creation on more shares. They have included legally binding terms that this will not be an viable action by AMC until 2022. The fact is if the stock is overvalued whenever they see these proposed shares available to see. They could very well sell as a form of liquidity to provide for new growth, operational expense and lessening of liabilities. Yes share dilution typically hurts a stocks market value, but helps to aid its fundamental value.
I mean the financial value of the 25 million shares multiplied by current market valuation would knowingly dilute the shares. But this opens them up to a avenue of unloading a sustainable amount of their debt and cleaning up their balance sheet.. important to keep in mind. The amount will vary until this is actually approved and contracts wrote. If AMC does similar to GME, that could very well be 2.5 to 5 billion dollars of liquidity to tackle their debt.
Either way it's not planned yet. Not approved. And legally could not happen until 2022.
I mean the financial value of the 25 million shares multiplied by current market valuation would knowingly dilute the shares. But this opens them up to a avenue of unloading a sustainable amount of their debt and cleaning up their balance sheet.. important to keep in mind. The amount will vary until this is actually approved and contracts wrote. If AMC does similar to GME, that could very well be 2.5 to 5 billion dollars of liquidity to tackle their debt.
Either way it's not planned yet. Not approved. And legally could not happen until 2022.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:02 am to CajunCraftsman225
Naked short selling and synthetic shares is not a basic trading theory dude
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:15 am to slackster
quote:
king on every vlog
You know I'm not very fond of youtuber vlogs. I would say 50% of AMC shareholders aren't either.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:17 am to CajunCraftsman225
quote:
Quite literally their job is to be able to freely talk about the financial markets and current trading trends being futured on their programming.
They do. Every day.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:22 am to Upperdecker
But short selling is. Naked short selling is illegal. They should have known that much prior to the start of the year if they deem theirself fit for financial news coverage.
The full extent of the situation would not be expected to be known. Simply the basics of the current trend.
The full extent of the situation would not be expected to be known. Simply the basics of the current trend.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:49 am to CajunCraftsman225
Melissa Lee’s financial knowledge is not why she’s an anchor dude. She’s a journalist not an analyst. Just let it go man
Posted on 6/5/21 at 12:46 pm to Upperdecker
I'm curious why our board MOASS conspiracy theorists have sided with AMC vs GME. As ridiculous as the theory is in general, it's much more likely for GME than AMC, and the GME believer community is significantly larger than the AMC community on reddit.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 12:49 pm to MusclesofBrussels
Probably because the cheaper entry point of AMC.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 12:56 pm to theOG
That was my guess, although at least one of them on here has claimed to have a large amount of money in AMC so share price shouldn't matter.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 1:41 pm to MusclesofBrussels
What are you baws expecting when the market opens Monday?
Posted on 6/5/21 at 2:57 pm to southpawcock
Honestly a gap down. Afternoon, AH was rough. Think it will test that last $36 bounce.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 4:16 pm to CajunCraftsman225
quote:The naysayers just want to ignore the obvious stuff that is bouncing off their forehead. In Chitstain's case, his taint, but they have very much underestimated the the vast amount of research that has gone into this play.
I have said it multiple times, and I will say it again. We may be acting like idiots out of joy and appear as seemingly fools, but we are indeed very calculated.
Welcome to the wide world of information!
That info is there, but many just choose to ignore it.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 4:19 pm to Upperdecker
quote:I'm starting to think, you have also took a big short-term, short position. My Cajun friend is destroying your arguments, and this is what you pivot to?
It’s pretty clear she’s just acknowledging the theory. It’s not an admission that it’s happening, nor would CNBC news anchors know about that stuff
Anyone with half a brain, can see that SHE IS AGREEING!
Page 183 of 276
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News