- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Holding AMC Thread- Diamond hands unite
Posted on 6/5/21 at 2:22 am to slackster
Posted on 6/5/21 at 2:22 am to slackster
The whole Ape theory is that these naked shorts are hidden, and not reflected in any "official" short interest data.
No idea if there's a truth to their belief that short interest is 300X the float but if they're right it's irrelevant what Ortex or anyone else has short interest at.
No idea if there's a truth to their belief that short interest is 300X the float but if they're right it's irrelevant what Ortex or anyone else has short interest at.
4
Posted on 6/5/21 at 8:32 am to thedisciple315
Didn't cnbc admit that they were naked shorts
Posted on 6/5/21 at 9:21 am to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
So your investing strategy is, look for companies doing so poorly that professionals short the shite out of them and hope you can generate a short squeeze by pumping it on reddit and MT?
Sounds silly when you say it like that.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 9:34 am to thedisciple315
quote:
No idea if there's a truth to their belief that short interest is 300X the float but if they're right it's irrelevant what Ortex or anyone else has short interest at.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t naked shorting illegal? So if this is true, it wouldn’t be reflected in anything official.
Here’s where I am with this. If shite does hit the fan this week and this thing shoots to absurd levels, it’s gonna be a lot of fun for me and we’re taking a very nice vacation. If it doesn’t and I sell around $35, I still make 325% on my initial investment and can walk away feeling pretty awesome about it.
So either way, I’m really interested to see where it goes. From a 10,000 ft view, it certainly seems like there’s some shenanigans going on.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 9:39 am to CajunCraftsman225
quote:
CajunCraftsman225
Posted on 6/5/21 at 9:48 am to thedisciple315
quote:Truer words, never spoken! That's what is lost on the naysayers here. Hell, CNBC admitted it on live TV yesterday.
The whole Ape theory is that these naked shorts are hidden, and not reflected in any "official" short interest data.
No idea if there's a truth to their belief that short interest is 300X the float but if they're right it's irrelevant what Ortex or anyone else has short interest at.
Here's something else that no one is bringing up on here. Failure to Delivers. Take a look at the this cold, hard data:
[/img]Posted on 6/5/21 at 9:52 am to elprez00
quote:Absolutely correct! All of this is coming to a head. Major news outlets are finally talking about what has been said on various forums and Youtube, for months!
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t naked shorting illegal? So if this is true, it wouldn’t be reflected in anything official.
Next week with be crazy volatile, with massive swings both ways. It will make the last couple of weeks look like small potatos.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:03 am to greygoose
BTW, y'all should look at the German market! AMC is up!
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:04 am to Chucktown_Badger
Not my strategy. I am not in any of the others aside from Blackberry because I see potential due to their automated transportation tech.
- cybersecurity
- self driving and other automated features car tech (huge one for me - I hate driving)
- newer contracts
- AI tech
- thousands of patents they are holding and maintaining
My play is simply on long term potential with Blackberry.
Now to your point their are some that are doing exactly what you said they are doing. I do not know the effect and stats, and I do not have the time or money to chase down all the details I'm looking for.
But to my point of my reddit post which I linked. . . There are institutions that I believe who are overleveraged in shorts. I am thinking and exploring if these same ones may be the literal next big thing to short of expectations to drop in market value tremendously. Someone has been eating tremendous losses. And that many stocks at once experiencing margin calls... I can only imagine the ripple effect. Just my two cents.
- cybersecurity
- self driving and other automated features car tech (huge one for me - I hate driving)
- newer contracts
- AI tech
- thousands of patents they are holding and maintaining
My play is simply on long term potential with Blackberry.
Now to your point their are some that are doing exactly what you said they are doing. I do not know the effect and stats, and I do not have the time or money to chase down all the details I'm looking for.
But to my point of my reddit post which I linked. . . There are institutions that I believe who are overleveraged in shorts. I am thinking and exploring if these same ones may be the literal next big thing to short of expectations to drop in market value tremendously. Someone has been eating tremendous losses. And that many stocks at once experiencing margin calls... I can only imagine the ripple effect. Just my two cents.
This post was edited on 6/5/21 at 10:06 am
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:04 am to greygoose
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:07 am to ItNeverRains
You reckon that was the moment the light bulb went off and she realized that the "nonsense" may be more factual than theoretical?
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:09 am to CajunCraftsman225
quote:
You reckon that was the moment the light bulb went off and she realized that the "nonsense" may be more factual than theoretical?
She shite her pants after she said it.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:10 am to Laffy Taffy Tiger
quote:
Didn't cnbc admit that they were naked shorts
It’s pretty clear she’s just acknowledging the theory. It’s not an admission that it’s happening, nor would CNBC news anchors know about that stuff
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:12 am to Upperdecker
quote:
nor would CNBC news anchors know about that stuff
Apparently CVP didn’t get the memo
This post was edited on 6/5/21 at 10:14 am
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:20 am to greygoose
Hey another truthful "gambler" who likes Green crayons and paper to examine their logic. Hats off to you Grey Goose and cheers.
I am glad you put this up. It is just a example of the hard numbers that represent the sentiment behind AMC.
I have said it multiple times, and I will say it again. We may be acting like idiots out of joy and appear as seemingly fools, but we are indeed very calculated. We are just acting like a pack of wild apes because the success is gradually becoming more readily attainable while the success already had is exponential.
quote:
something else that no one is bringing up on here. Failure to Delivers. Take a look at the this cold, hard data:
I am glad you put this up. It is just a example of the hard numbers that represent the sentiment behind AMC.
I have said it multiple times, and I will say it again. We may be acting like idiots out of joy and appear as seemingly fools, but we are indeed very calculated. We are just acting like a pack of wild apes because the success is gradually becoming more readily attainable while the success already had is exponential.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:21 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
Payne began his career on Wall Street as an analyst at E.F. Hutton in 1985.[3] Payne is the chief executive officer and principal financial analyst of Wall Street Strategies,[4] a stock market research firm he founded in 1991.[5]
He’s really not an anchor by trade. He’s a Wall Street guy by trade
Whereas Melissa Lee (who supposedly let the cat out the bag) is by trade a journalist - not someone who would be intimately familiar with Wall St and hedge fund undercover strategies
This post was edited on 6/5/21 at 10:23 am
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:22 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
shite her pants
It was great. I watched the clip several times just because.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:24 am to greygoose
quote:
Here's something else that no one is bringing up on here. Failure to Delivers. Take a look at the this cold, hard data:
quote:
Please note that fails-to-deliver can occur for a number of reasons on both long and short sales. Therefore, fails-to-deliver are not necessarily the result of short selling, and are not evidence of abusive short selling or “naked” short selling
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:28 am to Upperdecker
quote:
acknowledging the theory
Exactly. Statement was acknowledgement on national media unintentionally. Body language expresses alot more. But the face says it all. To me, it appears to be the face of someone who just realized the facts of a situation after its been slapping them in the face for months.
quote:
CNBC news anchors know about that stuff
Financial news anchors should. It is sort of part of their job.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:30 am to thedisciple315
quote:
The whole Ape theory is that these naked shorts are hidden, and not reflected in any "official" short interest data.
No idea if there's a truth to their belief that short interest is 300X the float but if they're right it's irrelevant what Ortex or anyone else has short interest at.
Always cracks me up that Ortex is the king on every vlog until it shows something they don’t like, then it’s irrelevant.
Page 182 of 276
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News