Started By
Message

Fed/Powell - "It will become necessary to accelerate MBS/other balance sheet liquidations"

Posted on 6/23/22 at 3:12 pm
Posted by alpinetiger
Salt Lake City
Member since Apr 2017
5864 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 3:12 pm
Translation:

The FED is going to kill the massive divergence between household incomes and home prices, through MBS/other balance sheet sales and further rate increases. As a policy prescription they will overshoot their targets in the near term, as is normal (see historical empirical proof ala Overreaction Theory). Subsequently, housing and pricing will once again normalize, also as is historically normal. There is nothing new under the sun.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48945 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 3:26 pm to
Explain like I'm 5
Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
10400 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Explain like I'm 5


Recession is coming.
Posted by TeaParty
Member since May 2022
935 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

Explain like I'm 5


Start with what the hell is MBS and how does it affect me.
Posted by Drunken Crawfish
Member since Apr 2017
3823 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:09 pm to
Mortgage-Backed Securities.

But I have no idea what any of the other shite means
Posted by alpinetiger
Salt Lake City
Member since Apr 2017
5864 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

Explain like I'm 5
A simple explanation is that a healthy and normal Median Home Sales Price/Median Family Income Ratio is between 2 and 3 for the US average. Currently, the US is at 4.7. For reference, in 2008 it was 3.9. The FED is readying additional measures (along with rate increases) to lower this ratio. The higher the ratio in your local market, the more significant the price correction will be. In other words, a place like Seattle is going to get absolutely boned, while a place like Ames, Iowa will see a much flatter correction.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25354 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:40 pm to
So he’s suggesting that financial institutions and investors need to ditch MBS?

Can you give us a link?
This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 4:42 pm
Posted by alpinetiger
Salt Lake City
Member since Apr 2017
5864 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

So he’s suggesting that financial institutions and investors need to ditch MBS?

Can you give us a link?
I didn't/don't read articles. Powell made these comments during the Q & A of the Monetary Policy Report to Congress yesterday. Below is a link to his opening statement and you can watch the actual testimony, but the transcripts haven't been posted yet.

Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to Congress - Powell

Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36114 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 5:37 pm to
Reddit thread mentioning the other times MBS have received no bids:

LINK

quote:

The previous four times this has happened:

1979, Saturday of Columbus Day Weekend, Paul Volcker announced that the Fed would allow the cost of money to float as high as necessary. Mortgages 11% on Friday, on Tuesday after the holiday 13%. However! That was 15 years into entrenched inflation, oil ten times as expensive in 1979 as 1972, and our economy just beginning energy conservation and new supply. All incomes ramped right along with inflation. The US economy was a “things” economy, with little overseas competition for union-heavy US labor.

1994, February... the cost of money coming out of recession 1.00%, by year-end 1994 to 5.25% -- but in a disinflationary world, the cost of money was one-half the cycle peak four years before. 1994, February to May, mortgages from 7% to 9% -- that magic two-point rise flattened housing, and the Fed had to cut in 1995 to dodge recession. The new mortgage peak, stabilizing near 8% was down from 11% in 1990, and we enjoyed a genuine and rare soft landing.

2007, July... you had to be deep in the mortgage racket to understand the first collision. Subprime and Jumbos went no-bid, and stayed there. The Fed was slow to understand the credit panic, began frantic cuts the following winter from 5.25% to 2.00%. But mortgages did not respond, stuck above 6.00%.

2008, July... the no-bid expanded to all mortgages, even government guaranteed. The 10-year T-note anticipating recession and worse fell to 3.50% while retail mortgages rose to 7.00%. That 350bps spread is the closest comparable to today’s 300bps.




REITS may also indicate investors expect decreased real estate valuations in the near future
Posted by DVinBR
Member since Jan 2013
12981 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 6:10 pm to
quote:

Mortgage-Backed Securities


she can teach me about them anytime

Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21057 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 6:36 pm to
The housing market is their main target ... they know what most know which is they cannot mess with their Treasury bond market and they can't actually sell those into the marketplace

they are trying as hard as possible to threaten it ... as "QT" has not even started yet ... so if they actually reduce their balance sheet (arguable) it'll be MBS first and let the market sort that shite out (see: investors need higher yields for the risk, won't get it, puts pressure on interest rates and ultimately prices)

aplinetiger nailed it for the most part
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27585 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 9:48 pm to
Also of note - Powell looks worn the frick out. He may not survive this recession

Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36114 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 10:33 pm to
Powell is in a no win solution. He'd like to succeed with the Volcker playbook but we're in a different place in 2022 with the 30 trillion debt.

I see no painless solution
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89528 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 8:18 am to
I don't think they can artificially bust prices like this when there is a literal housing shortage. We've had over a decade of anemic new home construction and that can't be fixed with the stroke of a pen.

Economics 101 - Supply/demand
Posted by bod312
Member since Jul 2015
846 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 8:22 am to
quote:

I don't think they can artificially bust prices like this when there is a literal housing shortage.


quote:

Economics 101 - Supply/demand


You are only discussing 1 side of the equation, isn't he talking about the other?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89528 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 8:27 am to
quote:

You are only discussing 1 side of the equation, isn't he talking about the other?



The demand will still be there, but there will be fewer available dollars to offer the seller because more has to go to the bank. I get that, but typically those spikes are transitory and prices stabilize fairly quickly.

What happens is, higher interest rates make it more expensive to invest in new housing which will exacerbate the shortage and prolong it.

I don't know why more new homes weren't built in the past 15 years, but I suspect it is government regulation.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
15615 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 8:51 am to
I just feel like we are fricked until 2024 at the earliest. It’s only gonna get worse
Posted by alpinetiger
Salt Lake City
Member since Apr 2017
5864 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:01 am to
quote:

literal housing shortage
This is a well-worn myth that won't die. I've posted these graphs several times. This is not a "news" article from a housing market shill that is too lazy to look at near-time inventory data. These are simply data graphs from the Federal Reserve. The inventories will continue to increase in the coming months.:

This first graph is NEW Housing supply for the US. Between 6-9 months is the historical average (w/ population normalization). Tight inventory existed Q3 2020- Q32021, & Q1 2022, but doesn't exist now. In fact, the inventory delta from April to May was the largest increase in HISTORY.


Next is EXISTING Home Inventory. Historical normal (w/ population normalization) is 1.0mm to 1.4mm. Again tight inventories existed in Q4 2021 - Q1 2022. Not any longer. These number will continue to increase in the coming months.


Last is a frame of reference and comparison to 2008. The inventory J-curve is more vertical this time around. Will that continue? I don't know, I can't predict the future. But I speculate that it will because the divergence between incomes and housing costs is so high and you have the FED chirping about bringing this back in line.


Stop reading articles from housing market evangelists who repackage the same editorial playbook every market cycle. Look at the raw, near-time data. You can get this info directly from the FED.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6602 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:06 am to
How much of that open inventory is in places people don't want to live in anymore? I'm sure there are whole areas where people are saying frick this place. Like cities.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89528 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:11 am to
quote:

How much of that open inventory is in places people don't want to live in anymore?


Detroit and Baltimore come to mind.

And, "housing evangelists" or not, the fact that prior to that last bubble bursting, there were over 5 MILLION starts for the 3 years 2005 through 2007 and that was on a slight decline for 2007.

In the 15 years since, there have been barely 13 million (through 2021) starts, only getting back to pre-2008 levels in 2021. Roughly 1.5 million a year is a reasonable estimate of a median year going back decades.

The last 15 years has us roughly 9 to 10 million short.

This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 11:15 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram