Started By
Message

re: Fed Investments of 9 Billion has a return of 17 Billion.

Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:39 pm to
Posted by frogtown
Member since Aug 2017
5649 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

Then there's no difference in this.


The government shouldn't be doing either one.

So yes there is a difference.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55376 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 7:52 pm to
No. There is one difference. A possible ROI.


We have never and I mean that... never not done this.

Our gov has always spent money like that.


You may not like it, or agree with it. From bail outs to propping up needed industries, we have 100% done this from before our founding and from our founding til now.

Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
6369 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 8:34 pm to
Interesting thread. Did a deep dive into it and here is what I found.

1791 — First Bank of the United States. This lasted 20 years.

1816 — Second Bank of the United States. Lasted until 1836. Hamilton did not renew it.

mid 1800s — states, canals, and internal improvements

Much government investment in this period was state-level, not federal. States sponsored and sometimes subscribed stock to canal, turnpike, and internal-improvement companies (e.g., New York’s Erie Canal was authorized and funded by the state legislature beginning in 1817). States also directly built and operated infrastructure in some cases. These state investments were crucial to early U.S. economic development and represent frequent public ownership or part-ownership of corporations and projects.

The railroad boom required huge capital. The federal government supported rail expansion primarily through land grants and indirect subsidies (public land given to railroad companies between roughly 1850–1872), and states often issued bonds or subscribed to railroad stock. These were large public supports but normally did not make the federal government a long-term corporate shareholder in the way the First/Second Banks were.

The Gilded Age and post-Civil War years saw a dominance of private and foreign capital in railroads and industry; governments shifted toward subsidies, regulation, and land grants rather than routine federal equity holdings.

Really interesting topic
Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
6369 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 8:52 pm to
Let’s walk through every major instance of the U.S. federal government owning, founding, or holding equity in businesses or business-like entities from 1776 to the present.

I’ll distinguish clearly between:

1-Direct equity ownership in private corporations (government literally owned stock).

2- Government corporations (entities wholly owned by the federal government, operating like businesses).

3- Special or emergency stakes (temporary or hybrid forms).

Here we go:

1. Bank of North America (1781)

Created under the Articles of Confederation at Robert Morris’s urging.

The U.S. government subscribed $250,000 of the bank’s initial stock (roughly half the capital).

2. First Bank of the United States (1791–1811)

Authorized by Congress under Hamilton’s plan.

Capital: $10 million; 20% owned by the U.S. government.
Interesting part of this is that those WERE voting shares. The Federal Gov had the right to appoint 5 people to the board out of the 25. Government sold its shares for a profit.

1816–1836: Second Bank of the United States

Charter enacted 1816.

Federal ownership: Again about 20%

1836–1900: Internal Improvements & Subsidies, Not Federal Equity

Granted land to railroads (esp. 1850s–1870s).

Chartered and regulated certain companies (like the transcontinental telegraph).

Left most public investment to states, which often subscribed stock in canals, turnpikes, and railroads.

1900–1930: Rise of Federal Government Corporations

1904- Panama Railroad Company.. 100% ownership by federal Gov.

1917- U.S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. 100% owned by Federal Gov

1916- Federal Land Banks

1930s–1950s: New Deal and WWII Corporations

1932- Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC)

1933- Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)

1934- Export–Import Bank (Ex-Im Bank)

1933- Commodity Credit Corporation

1950–1990: Cold War to Deregulation


Most wartime enterprises were sold back to the private sector after 1945.

Remaining major federal corporations:

TVA

FDIC

Ex-Im Bank

Postal Service (USPS, reorganized 1971)

Amtrak (1971) — quasi-public rail passenger company; government owns all preferred stock.

Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae) — created 1968, government-owned.

Federal Financing Bank (1973) — Treasury-owned financial corporation.

2008–2015: Crisis-Era Equity Ownership

Treasury bought stock and warrants in hundreds of banks (Capital Purchase Program).

Owned equity in major private corporations temporarily:

Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo (preferred stock & warrants)

AIG (took 79.9% equity stake temporarily)

General Motors (61% ownership after bankruptcy restructuring)

Chrysler (partial ownership)

All eventually sold; by 2014–2015 the federal government no longer held those shares.

Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac (since 2008)

Placed into federal conservatorship.

Treasury owns senior preferred stock + warrants for 79.9% of common stock.

Still under conservatorship today (2025) — so this remains ongoing federal equity ownership.

2000s–Present: Permanent Federal Corporations

U.S. Postal Service (USPS) 1971 National mail delivery.

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) 1933 Power generation for the Southeast.

Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corp.) 1971 Passenger rail; Treasury owns all preferred shares.

Export–Import Bank 1934 Export financing.

Federal Financing Bank 1973 Centralized borrowing for federal agencies.

Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) 1933 Agricultural price stabilization.

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) 1974 Insures private pensions.

Overseas Private Investment Corporation (merged into DFC, 2019) 1971 Overseas development finance; successor U.S. International Development Finance Corp. (DFC) now government-owned.

FDIC 1933 Deposit insurance fund and resolution authority.
Ginnie Mae (GNMA) 1968 Guarantees mortgage-backed securities.


Posted by RoyalWe
Prairieville, LA
Member since Mar 2018
4257 posts
Posted on 10/14/25 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Can you explain how it is different?
The First Bank and modern bailouts look similar on paper, but they’re different in purpose. Hamilton’s bank built the foundation for a functioning market — a stable currency, public credit, and basic financial order. It was a one-time act of creation.

Modern bailouts, by contrast, step in after the fact to save existing players from the consequences of their own risk. One created capitalism; the other distorts it. That’s the difference between nation-building and damage control.

I think we’ve circled the same debate that’s been with us since Hamilton and Jefferson — stability versus purity. There’s always a trade-off between saving the system and letting it cleanse itself.

I lean toward letting markets adjust, because every bailout trades long-term discipline for short-term comfort. It may keep the lights on, but it dims accountability.

Either way, it’s not a new argument — just another chapter in the same one our founders started. Appreciate the thoughtful exchange.
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
20278 posts
Posted on 10/15/25 at 4:27 am to
I feel like I should get credit for an economics and government class.

BCreed1, you have educated me on this topic.

Thanks.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11764 posts
Posted on 10/15/25 at 7:00 am to
quote:

Because it’s anti-capitalist, anti-free market bullshite that’s the first step down the path to communism?


This. Politicians shouldn't be buying individual shares either.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram