Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Estate Planning: Wills vs Revocable Trusts - Erin Talks Money 30-min video

Posted on 6/9/26 at 8:04 pm
Posted by Everyday Is Saturday
Member since Dec 2025
1938 posts
Posted on 6/9/26 at 8:04 pm
LINK



Starting the estate planning learning process. Found this video to be clear, concise and taught me a lot in 30 minutes. Worth a look if you are at similar stage.

Summary:

Estate planning is not just about paperwork — it’s about legal structure, probate, control, and how assets actually transfer at death. In this in-depth guide to wills vs trusts, Erin walks through what a will actually does, what a revocable living trust actually does, and how probate really works. They cover how assets transfer by beneficiary designation, by title, and through probate court — and why your will does not control everything you own. If you’ve ever wondered whether you need a trust to avoid probate, whether trusts reduce estate taxes, what happens if you die without a will, or how retirement accounts and life insurance policies pass to beneficiaries, this video breaks it down clearly and mechanically.

You’ll learn the real differences between a will and a revocable living trust, how probate assets differ from non-probate assets, how joint ownership with right of survivorship works, and why funding a trust properly matters more than simply drafting one. We also cover incapacity planning, including how a successor trustee can step in under a revocable trust, how powers of attorney fit into an estate plan, and why guardianship for minor children can only be named in a will. I briefly explain irrevocable trusts as well — including when they may be used for estate tax planning, asset protection, or Medicaid planning — while keeping the primary focus on the practical decision most families face: will vs revocable living trust.

This video is designed to give you a clear estate planning framework before you meet with a qualified estate planning attorney. Whether you’re planning for minor children, navigating a second marriage or blended family, thinking about probate avoidance, or simply trying to coordinate beneficiary designations with your overall financial plan, understanding how wills and trusts actually function is critical. Estate planning is a foundational part of retirement planning, wealth transfer strategy, tax planning, and long-term financial security. Once you understand how assets legally move and who controls them at different stages of life, you can build a plan that fits your family, your state laws, and your priorities — without being driven by myths or marketing.
This post was edited on 6/10/26 at 11:34 am
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22152 posts
Posted on 6/10/26 at 7:50 am to
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
3251 posts
Posted on 6/10/26 at 5:31 pm to
You're gonna enjoy today's Erin episode with George Kamel.

Posted by Everyday Is Saturday
Member since Dec 2025
1938 posts
Posted on 6/10/26 at 6:35 pm to
Good stuff! Two good finance YouTubers right there.
Posted by Dav
Dhan
Member since Feb 2010
8157 posts
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:42 pm to
Kamel sucks. Fake millionaire debt crusader.
Posted by Everyday Is Saturday
Member since Dec 2025
1938 posts
Posted on 6/10/26 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

Fake millionaire debt crusader.


Do you mean illiquid (home equity) millionaires?

Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
3251 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 8:58 am to
Kamel's man on street videos are the only finance content that resonates with my teens so I appreciate that. Sure, the Ramsey anti debt dogma is overly simplistic but serves a purpose for those starting out/struggling to get finances in order. Simple people need simple rules to live by. Leverage and good debt can come later.
This post was edited on 6/11/26 at 8:59 am
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
49613 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

Do you mean illiquid (home equity) millionaires?
no such thing. You need a place to live. I don’t even consider the value of my home which I have owned free and clear for a decade…what would be the point of that?
Posted by Everyday Is Saturday
Member since Dec 2025
1938 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 6:42 pm to
I think he is fanging Ramsey lieutenant for evangelizing no debt and creating “fake millionaires” because net worth is predominantly home equity (not liquid cash).

TorchtheflyingTiger gets it right above. About how I see it.

Not sure what you mean by no such thing? A millionaire by net worth who is, for example, $750,000 home equity of their $1million really only has $250,000 liquidity. Believe poster above is referring to this example as fake millionaires



This post was edited on 6/11/26 at 6:45 pm
Posted by Auburn80
Backwater, TN
Member since Nov 2017
10115 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 6:48 pm to
It’s what it’s worth to your heirs that matters. And Nancy Pelosi would like to tax it also.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
49613 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

It’s what it’s worth to your heirs that matters
. Nah. She doesn’t care and I don’t blame her. My point is there is no such thing as a home equity millionaire. You either have 1MM in cash or equivalents or you don’t
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
3251 posts
Posted on 6/11/26 at 9:04 pm to
You're just redefining a word to what you prefer. Millionaire is based on NW not you're chosen interpretation. Besides, they could sell or borrow to access home equity so it is obviously a useable financial asset. Not to mention, owning the home outright eventually reduces housing expenses.
Posted by SCwTiger
armpit of 'merica
Member since Aug 2014
6995 posts
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:31 am to
quote:

equivalents

Wouldn't your home and property be Equivalents?
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
49613 posts
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:49 am to
is my home a cash equivalent? No
Posted by Everyday Is Saturday
Member since Dec 2025
1938 posts
Posted on 6/12/26 at 11:35 pm to
Can’t eat equity. I hear you.

Net worth includes it by its definition. I think it’s a feel good status. But I also agree that liquid cash is what really matters, especially for one who is planning their financial independence / retirement income planning.

Posted by 98eagle
Member since Sep 2020
3194 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:16 pm to
Erin Moriarity has a really good financial YouTube channel. She has a lot of great videos regarding Retirement strategies, Portfolio and Income strategies, Social Security, Financial mindsets, Estate Planning, and more.

Concerning the discussion in this thread regarding millionaires with liquid assets vs. assets that are tied up in home equity, in the video below, Erin explains the difference between primarily Paper Millionaires vs Liquid Millionaires vs. Optimal Millionaires and the financial mindsets and freedoms of each even though they may have similar net worths.

This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 4:28 pm
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
49613 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 5:05 pm to
exactly
the goal should be considering your home as zero worth. You need a place to live. I do not take into account, and did not consider, the worth of my home when I decided to retire. My wife and I need a place to live. We probably won’t sell it until one of us dies or we both decide to move (and then guess what…we need another house ).

if you intend to sell your home with extensive equity then fine…calculate the equity less the cost of a new house into your worth.

liquid means freedom. Freedom to spend and enjoy life. Until you are liquid you can’t do that
Posted by 98eagle
Member since Sep 2020
3194 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

liquid means freedom. Freedom to spend and enjoy life. Until you are liquid you can’t do that
Couldn't agree more. My wife and I buy and do whatever we want, whenever we want.

I like the way Erin explains things, especially how your mindset and spending habits can change with a simple change of strategy allowing you to enjoy your retirement more. Her comparison of a Liquid Millionaire to an Optimal Millionaire was pretty awesome.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
49613 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

Her comparison of a Liquid Millionaire to an Optimal Millionaire was pretty awesome.
yes. Once you become securely liquid then the goal shifts to having that liquidity work harder for you than you ever could have worked before. And that’s why I’m still fully invested in equity to the extent I feel comfortable (I turn 60 in November). A great deal of my plan is for my liquid assets to grow considerably before I turn 80. But you have to have a lot of money first, not tied up in a house.

there is zero chance I could sell my house and come out ahead on a new place to live…if I got 300 I’d be lucky. Then what?
Posted by 98eagle
Member since Sep 2020
3194 posts
Posted on 6/13/26 at 8:23 pm to
An ideal scenario is that your Social Security plus other income (combinations that might include portfolio interest/dividends, pensions, rental income, etc.) will be greater than your normal spending requirements to support your desired lifestyle, before even touching your portfolio.

Even then (whether your income is more or less than your spending), as Erin explains, with a sizeable enough portfolio, it is still perfectly okay to draw down your portfolio from a draw down bucket while you let your remaining portfolio continue to grow. Some people spend their careers amassing large retirement accounts, but when they retire they are gun shy to withdraw sizeable amounts from them.

She gave an example where a 65 year old couple had $2 Million in retirement accounts plus $60K in annual social security and they wanted to withdraw $80K a year from their retirement accounts, but they were scared to do so. She said as an example, they could draw down $80K a year for 5 years from a $400K high yield savings account or equivalent equity in their retirement accounts and let the $1.6 Million continue to appreciate over the 5 years. The growth of the portfolio plus likely decline in annual spending would still have the couple in great financial shape.

That versus being scared to spend from their portfolio and enjoying their retirement less. It's a mindset. That couple would likely never spend their portfolio. But psychologically creating a draw down bucket of a cash equivalent regardless of market conditions allows the couple to spend to support their $140K a year lifestyle without worry.

Erin explains the caveats much better and in more detail than I can in her videos than I can ever do justice to, in typing on this board. My explanation is dumbed down in comparison to hers. She explains multiple examples where individuals or couples with the exact same age and portfolio value in retirement could actually accomplish the same annual spending with a significantly smaller portfolio than others who likely will need a larger portfolio to support the exact same annual spending. It's definitely helpful to see her different scenarios and examples.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 9:09 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram