- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
BOA spending $250MM a year on GLP-1 drugs
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:03 am
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:03 am
quote:LINK
Bank of America
spends more than $250 million a year covering GLP-1 weight loss drugs for its employees, CEO Brian Moynihan told CNBC on Wednesday, saying the rapidly rising cost is a worthwhile investment in his workforce.
The company sets aside more than $2 billion a year on healthcare overall for BofA’s roughly 211,000 employees, meaning that GLP-1 medications alone now account for roughly 13% of all healthcare spending, per figures provided by Moynihan.
“We spend about $250 million or more on GLPs, and that’s up from zero” four or five years ago, Moynihan told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin. “We see a great impact on the employees.”
Employers across the country have grappled with soaring demand for GLP-1 drugs such as Ozempic and Wegovy, which can cost thousands of dollars per patient annually. Many self-insured companies and public employers have restricted coverage or debated whether they can afford the treatments as utilization has climbed.
Moynihan acknowledged that some employees may leave Bank of America before the company realizes the long-term savings from improved health, but he said the decision ultimately reflects a push to provide valuable benefits.
Bank of America pairs access to the drugs with health coaching to help monitor weight loss and lifestyle adjustments, the CEO said. Beyond long-term preventative health, Moynihan pointed to emerging clinical data suggesting nearer-term benefits, including a lower incidence of cardiovascular events.
“It’s been fascinating to watch our teammates’ behavior on these adjustments — the loss of weight,” he said.
The nation’s second-largest lender by assets is also using its size to negotiate lower prices from drugmakers and pharmacy benefit managers, he said.
“Believe me, we’re pounding everybody on price and trying to get as cheap [as possible],” Moynihan said. “But our view is that [because of] the long-term health benefits, plus there may be more short-term health benefits ... it’s a good investment.”
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:12 am to bigjoe1
That is 0.86% of their net profit, they will survive
They are right in reduced healthcare costs, so perfect example of spending money to save money down the line.
They are right in reduced healthcare costs, so perfect example of spending money to save money down the line.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:31 am to bigjoe1
Our school district just came out and said they wouldn't cover a lot of the GLP-1 drugs, there are a few they will still cover but it can't be just for strictly weight loss. I know they're expensive, but as said above, they will cut down on your overall medical costs over time. Heck my wife's intake nurse, her husband is a diabetic and they put him on these and he is at the point now where is no longer actually diabetic.
I'm not saying these are perfect, but man they can go a long way to helping with a lot of people's issues.
I'm not saying these are perfect, but man they can go a long way to helping with a lot of people's issues.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:41 am to DarthRebel
quote:
They are right in reduced healthcare costs, so perfect example of spending money to save money down the line.
I agree. Obesity leads to so many other long term health issues so it is a wise investment.
Losing weight with diet and exercise would be the best option but for so many people they just don't have the will power
Posted on 8/5/26 at 10:50 am to grsharky
quote:
I know they're expensive
Their must be legal reasons they can only buy name brand GLP-1. In real life GLP-1s are cheap and abundant from compound pharmacies.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 11:30 am to bigjoe1
I'm surprised more companies dont do this honestly.
With how expensive health insurance has gotten, its pretty clear a huge issue with that is how unhealthy we are overall.
With how expensive health insurance has gotten, its pretty clear a huge issue with that is how unhealthy we are overall.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 12:42 pm to thunderbird1100
GLP-1s are terrible for people, but so is being obese.
I suppose bone density is “the lesser of two evils” (according to Boa)…these medications are egregiously bad. There will be demand, but there will also be major backlash in the coming years. (Already starting now)
I suppose bone density is “the lesser of two evils” (according to Boa)…these medications are egregiously bad. There will be demand, but there will also be major backlash in the coming years. (Already starting now)
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 12:43 pm
Posted on 8/5/26 at 12:47 pm to iPad
quote:yes, but any drug or chemical that has adverse side effects is bad for you regardless of your other symptoms. Interventional medicine will always carry side effects.
GLP-1s are terrible for people, but so is being obese
The answer is not getting fat in the first place but that horse is way out the barn. Live look at the obesity epidemic:

Posted on 8/5/26 at 12:56 pm to bigjoe1
Ozempic saved my life. The BP medication they had me on made me insulin resistant. First the type 2 diagnosis then came bypass surgery. Two years after the bypass, I started Ozempic. Two years after starting Ozempic my A1C dropped to 5.4 and now I take it occasionally. I lost about 80 pounds.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 12:59 pm to BCvol
that story is not unusual obviously, it’s why the drugs exist. You didn’t take them because you are fat though
Posted on 8/5/26 at 1:17 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
I'm surprised more companies dont do this honestly.
Most health plans can't take a 30-50% in immediate cost increases (which raises premiums) for a reduction in costs down the road.
Google around how much GLP-1 coverage increases overall plan spend and you'll see how insane the numbers are.
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 8/5/26 at 1:26 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
stuff like this needs to be disrupted. It’s a public health emergency. We cannot continue on this path if we want to maximize our opportunities as a nation. Our population skews fat and stupid. Both are self inflicted and both are fixable
Posted on 8/5/26 at 1:40 pm to BCvol
quote:
Ozempic saved my life. The BP medication they had me on made me insulin resistant. First the type 2 diagnosis then came bypass surgery. Two years after the bypass, I started Ozempic. Two years after starting Ozempic my A1C dropped to 5.4 and now I take it occasionally. I lost about 80 pounds.
Happy to hear and congratulations!
Posted on 8/5/26 at 2:21 pm to bigjoe1
if i worked for BOA i would want to know why i didnt get $1k/month as well but not for a shot since im not fat........
Posted on 8/5/26 at 2:34 pm to tigeraddict
why? Do you think every BOA employee uses/receives every benefit they offer?
Popular
Back to top
5







