Started By
Message

re: $25,000 to invest. Where to put it?

Posted on 7/25/13 at 1:32 pm to
Posted by austiger
Austin
Member since Apr 2012
743 posts
Posted on 7/25/13 at 1:32 pm to
Having made a ton of mistakes, I'd say you should put 80% into dividend bearing stops and let them DRIP... things that aren't going anywhere but help you compound interest early.

Take 20% for speculative bets... which for me would be growth stocks like FB, BIDU, NFLX, AMZN... things with no dividend but tons of growth potential.

austiger
Posted by wegotdatwood
Member since Aug 2009
17094 posts
Posted on 7/25/13 at 1:49 pm to
My goal is to have 30k in dividend income a year by the time I retire. I'm only 24, but my income won't go very high most likely.
Posted by Tigerstudent08
Lakeview
Member since Apr 2007
5776 posts
Posted on 7/25/13 at 2:18 pm to
Put $25k in ACO. Our earnings report is coming out tomorrow and the stock has been on a tear the last month. I predict it will go up 7% tomorrow and then I'm selling at the end of the day.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
27699 posts
Posted on 7/25/13 at 3:40 pm to
Iraqi dinar
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72615 posts
Posted on 7/25/13 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

My goal is to have 30k in dividend income a year by the time I retire. I'm only 24, but my income won't go very high most likely.



You will get there much sooner if you use real estate. Dividend paying stocks are great but they do not come even close to the returns you get with real estate.

Good thing is you are very young and time is definitely on your side.
Posted by jeepfreak
Back in the BR
Member since Oct 2003
19433 posts
Posted on 7/26/13 at 12:56 pm to
I"d research the following if I were you:

COTY
GME
CRM
CNC
VOL
BEAV

Posted by wegotdatwood
Member since Aug 2009
17094 posts
Posted on 7/26/13 at 1:00 pm to
I've considered that, I'm not too keen on the idea of being a landlord. I'll look into it
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72615 posts
Posted on 7/26/13 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

I've considered that, I'm not too keen on the idea of being a landlord. I'll look into it



you do not have to be a landlord. You can use a property manager and still have great PCF. It does not have to be local either. Depends on the market you want to invest in. Many cities are different. Look up the top 10 cities in the US to own rental property. That will get you started if you are in a bad market where you live or if it is tough to get PCF.
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19239 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 10:18 am to
I've wondered that. The property manager will do literally everything, to where you don't even have to live in the same state?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89512 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Not OT responses please. No hookers and blow. Give me a few stocks.


I would tell you that, seriously, most research suggests that you should invest in yourself, i.e. experiences. If you have put off vacations for a while, that would be a good use for perhaps as much as $3k to $4k of this money.

However, as to your point, have you read any of TheBigFella's research on Visa? I would just buy 100 shares of that, if I were in your position.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84785 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 11:28 am to
While you usually can't go wrong with large-cap dividend payers, a case can be made that the last few years of extremely low interest rates have made them a pricey acquisition. Personally, I'd look elsewhere.

Try VXF, the Vanguard Extended Market ETF. Indexes against virtually all US regularly traded stocks EXCEPT those in the S&P 500. I'm of the opinion that if this rally is going to continue, it will do so on the backs of the small-caps and/or growth oriented companies. Here is the Vanguard link. LINK
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89512 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Try VXF, the Vanguard Extended Market ETF. Indexes against virtually all US regularly traded stocks EXCEPT those in the S&P 500. I'm of the opinion that if this rally is going to continue, it will do so on the backs of the small-caps and/or growth oriented companies. Here is the Vanguard link.


And my retirement fund is in Indexes - I'm not against them, but the OP is obviously a stock investor. I like a number of larger companies with growth potential - PM is one, V is another. I think CAT, MMM, JNJ and a number of larger companies have the potential for some modest growth, on top of their solid history of dividends which almost guarantees you won't lose ground against inflation.

I have been, to a certain degree, converted to TBF's philosophy - what is the point of all this investing? For many people, it is to bet for or against parts of the market (or for the entire market) to grow an investment, to then later sell and pocket the profit. The dividend reinvestment strategy achieves growth by buying and holding a company that is making money, and will likely continue - ultimately, when you need the income, you stop the DRIP and start taking the dividends.

THAT makes more sense than the gambling nature of the speculative market - if you have time. Companies like these large cap, good dividend stocks are both hedges against inflation AND hedges against market fluctuations. You do not have the potential for large gains, short and mid term like small and mid caps, BUT, taking the risk down to such a level that, in time, you get those gains at the end.

Am I making any sense?
Posted by Chris Farley
Regulating
Member since Sep 2009
4180 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

You do not have the potential for large gains, short and mid term like small and mid caps, BUT, taking the risk down to such a level that, in time, you get those gains at the end.
Am I making any sense?



No, not really.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89512 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

No, not really.


Risk=cost (unless you're very lucky with choice, timing or both).

Lowering the risk, decreases the raw cost, which amplifies over time, and this compounds, just like interest. You don't have to be as lucky, but you might have to wait longer.
Posted by Chris Farley
Regulating
Member since Sep 2009
4180 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 12:11 pm to
It's not the same return if you have to wait longer.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89512 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

It's not the same return if you have to wait longer.


The average can be, if the big payoff comes at the end. But, I understand the argument against the DRIP strategy - some argue it's obsolete with ETFs and the whole range of indexes that are able to simulate some things. And, the big stocks do have volatility and are susceptible to retractions. But I like the certainty of it - when I look at my TSP balance, I see X of shares in C (S&P) 500 - but what do I own?

When I look at my shares of KO, for example, I know - hey? I own 0.000000000001% (or whatever) of the biggest beverage company in the world. I can choose to keep this investment in a company, product line and management team. If they do well, I maintain the position or buy more. If they disappoint me, I reduce or eliminate my position and invest in another company.

Yes, I can do the same thing with fund managers, but I'm ONLY investing in people, and relying on their decisions on the stock market.

I guess, on top of the security and lack of volatility, I like the control aspect of single stock investing (although I do not recommend it for retirement savings).

Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72615 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

I've wondered that. The property manager will do literally everything, to where you don't even have to live in the same state?



yup....and contrary to popular belief.............

killer cash flow!

No different than a job, you have to go where the money is and where the best deals are.
Posted by ThaBigFella
baton rouge
Member since Apr 2006
2043 posts
Posted on 7/27/13 at 8:49 pm to
Fat Bastard, I didn't want to start another thread to ask this, but in your opinion in real estate is it better to go after big dollar deals or is it better at the bottom?

What I mean is say I wanted to spend $500k in cash, would it be better to

1.Buy a $500k home cash and rent it
2.Buy (4) $125K homes and rent them
3.Buy (10) $50K homes and rent them

If you're going with a property manager anyways, the headache part wouldn't really matter but I've been wanting to begin looking in residential real estate, but I honestly hate dealing with realtors so I've tried to do my own research and obviously I feel the pricy single home would have more upside potential and the collection of $50k homes wouldn't really appreciate much.

but as far as renting and generating cash flow, I'd imagine the cheap homes lease right away, albeit to a crummy tenant and the pricier home would sit for a while if you were trying to rent.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89512 posts
Posted on 7/28/13 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Fat Bastard, I didn't want to start another thread to ask this, but in your opinion in real estate is it better to go after big dollar deals or is it better at the bottom?


On the theory side, you go with the axiom - you make your money in real estate when you buy, rather than sell. What that means is - if you can get the property at a discount, because the property or neighborhood is distressed or the seller is motivated, etc., that's the decision that makes you money. The closer you pay to market value, the longer it will take to recoup your investment, even if it was a quality purchase that rises in value. Also, the closer you pay to market value, strongly implies the less rehabilitation you have to do.

Now, why is this important when we're talking about rentals? Well, all other things being the same, your rental rates will track very closely to the appraised value of the property.

Now, having said that, there are pros and cons of each approach. The shotgun gives you a big buffer against fluctuations in demand for real estate. However, all of those transactions cost about the same, so you if go 4 or 10 instead of 1, you're increasing the cost of doing business.

On the other hand, if somebody can afford to rent a $500k house, they can definitely afford to buy. You will have far, far more potential renters in properties say, under $75k in most markets (in the Southeast, outside of speciality markets), than you will above $250k. Low income renters have a reputation for being a headache (especially when the rent is due), but high end renters are also very particular and can generate a high rate of complaints, etc.

Ideally a handful of mid-to-high tenants would allow you to focus on other things. The more total units (regardless of value), the more you will have to work them, even with a property manager handling day-to-day stuff.

If you want the truth? In Louisiana, trailer parks are a better way to go, from a pure profit margin. Once it is set up, pretty much zilch maintenance (a little grass cutting/weed eating), and if they don't pay, you just haul their trailer out. While the average joe may have trouble coming up with $450 or $500 - everybody can pony up $75 or $100 to keep their trailer lot.
This post was edited on 7/28/13 at 8:31 am
Posted by ThaBigFella
baton rouge
Member since Apr 2006
2043 posts
Posted on 7/28/13 at 9:27 am to
hey thanks for the info Ace. Definitely don't wanna deal with trailer park renters haha. I've just been thinking about rental condos recently but always figured that 1 expensive place would get me a "better" tenant ie no worries about bills paid on time and the odds of them being hooligans being less.

I was looking in Miami bc I want to move there full time in a year or two bc one of my businesses is there and it's well, gorgeous so I was looking into buying a place now,renting it out till I move and saving on a sure uptick in price in that timeframe. The issue is Miami is soooooo different from Dallas in the rental world. Condos in Dallas that are $800k rent for 2x the money that $2M condos in Miami rent for and with steeper maintenance fees and a higher mortgage its mind-boggling. I figured Miami would be pricier and easy to rent on the ocean, but I guess it's the lack of a real economy that causes rents to be cheap and units to be empty since vacationers aren't going to lease for 1 year. So it's had me really hesitant about buying anything down there before I move bc it seems like a lot of people in florida take a short term loss and recoup with capital gains that are astonishing, one condo building I liked, I looked through closed transactions and units that sold for $775K in early 2010, resold this year for $1.6M just wild.

I was thinking about getting a hotel rental unit but I was curious about the pros and cons of investing the same amount in 1 vs multiple units. Thanks again
This post was edited on 7/28/13 at 9:30 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram