- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/10/23 at 6:34 pm to bulldogger
quote:
My stance is why do little c unt jobs like you need to make everything in to a political issue, you miserable f uck
Literally all they have in life is allegiance to their political tribe.
Posted on 9/10/23 at 6:40 pm to nitwit
You can not be convicted of a crime in a civil case, nitwit. In a civil case, you are not required to determine guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Precisely why they chose to pursue civil litigation and not criminal.
This is basic stuff.
This is basic stuff.
Posted on 9/10/23 at 6:45 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
Well … they would talk every two weeks , phone records say , about 27 times , for 30 mins . If she didn’t want the attention , she could just hang up . I think she had an interest in him . Again , he should have known better than to have an affair with a sexual assault /rape activist . Geez ! Should’ve hit the Vegas bunny ranch !
Posted on 9/10/23 at 6:46 pm to StadiumDormNEZ72
quote:
Politically correct" and "affirmative action" do hold some merit in many situations
Please go on I’m waiting to hear this.
Posted on 9/10/23 at 6:47 pm to Zippydog
She also could have felt that he would stop using her organization if she didn’t field his calls.
I agree that he should have known better regardless. Isn’t he married?
I agree that he should have known better regardless. Isn’t he married?
This post was edited on 9/10/23 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 9/10/23 at 6:48 pm to TigerOnTheMountain
For the record, Trump is not fit to be President....but the woke left is destroying our country.
Posted on 9/10/23 at 6:57 pm to BUKA
I down voted you. I don't recall that many interested in Tucker, and those that were thought he would succeed based on his track record. I don't recall any "wokeness" in those reasons. So really it seems you want to complain about wokeness, but there are much better arguments than the one you made and much better places to discuss it. So, downvote.
Now, I do remember lots of people having their panties in a wad when President Tate was hired expecting a "woke agenda" to be implemented. There doesn't seem to be much complaining about that anymore.
Now, I do remember lots of people having their panties in a wad when President Tate was hired expecting a "woke agenda" to be implemented. There doesn't seem to be much complaining about that anymore.
Posted on 9/10/23 at 6:57 pm to BUKA
Thank God we didn’t go after that LOSER !
Posted on 9/10/23 at 7:02 pm to BUKA
Woke? Just say the real meaning you a-hole!
Posted on 9/10/23 at 7:27 pm to BUKA
More than Wokesters did. He did a really good job at a mid-tier (at best) Big Ten school. Why would anyone not consider him before all this stuff tarnished his image (I don't really know enough to render an opinion on that yet).
Posted on 9/10/23 at 7:36 pm to BUKA
quote:
Wokesters wanted Mel Tucker in our coaching search
No, they didn't. That was a Boogeyman by some of our more delicate negatards.
Posted on 9/10/23 at 7:37 pm to DocBugbear
quote:
Now, I do remember lots of people having their panties in a wad when President Tate was hired expecting a "woke agenda" to be implemented. There doesn't seem to be much complaining about that anymore.
They were convinced that Tate was going to force Woody to hire Tucker. It was nonsense.
This post was edited on 9/10/23 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 9/10/23 at 7:42 pm to atltiger6487
quote:what the hell does this have to do with woke?
what the hell does this have to do with Trump?!?!
It's VERY telling that everybody jumped on the guy that said Trump, but only one person mentioned the idiocy of bringing "woke" into a hiring discussion.
Explain to me why hiring a black football head coach is considered "woke"?
All of this is ignorant and the main people talking about not bringing politics into everything are the exact ones doing it.
Posted on 9/10/23 at 7:51 pm to nitwit
Nitwit is the perfect name for you! But IDIOT is even better!
Posted on 9/10/23 at 8:13 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:
Explain to me why hiring a black football head coach is considered "woke"?
It’s not unless that’s the primary reason for their hiring. Ryan Clark flat out said LSU needs a black coach. Qualifications be damned.
Posted on 9/10/23 at 8:35 pm to BUKA
Yeah, and you are using later data, that was not available then, to criticize their opinion. That’s bogus.
It might have been bad advice, but if so it ws for reasons known at that time.
It might have been bad advice, but if so it ws for reasons known at that time.
Posted on 9/10/23 at 8:39 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:
Explain to me why hiring a black football head coach is considered "woke"?
2011 JAX 2-3
2019 Colorado 5–7
2020 Michigan State 2–5
2021 Michigan State 6-0 (when EdO was fired)
There is only one reason why a guy with that resume is on the list of a 3-time national champion
quote:
woke - adjective: alert to and concerned about social injustice and discrimination
Posted on 9/10/23 at 8:41 pm to The Boat
quote:
A requirement to be LSU’s football coach is to be a poon hound so he would have fit right in.
Posted on 9/10/23 at 8:43 pm to nitwit
quote:
nitwit
Apt.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News