Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Will be interesting to see what direction we go at Star without spears

Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:59 pm
Posted by Cd104
Member since Aug 2018
2433 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:59 pm
Do we simply move Jhase Thomas to star and keep Cooley/Benefield at safety or do you want Thomas’s speed and range at safety and slide Cooley back to nickel? I think regardless Jhase Thomas can thrive in either spot.

He has the cover skills and physicality to play the star and has the range to play deep safety. He doesn’t quite have spears size but I think he may be faster than spears. Sucks to lose such a unique chess piece in Dashawn tho no replacing his size and versatility .
Posted by GeauxLaneTrain
Coastal Empire
Member since Aug 2026
612 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:00 pm to
Curious for TE as well. Roman Mothershead is a big dude
Posted by Kato
Sec 102
Member since Nov 2006
3273 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:01 pm to
I wonder if Charles Ross could learn the star position. He sure seems athletic enough.
Posted by friendlyobservation
Member since Mar 2024
5913 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:01 pm to
Star is basically like your extra nickel guy I think he can thrive there. Would make sense to slide Ty over. I guess it depends on what they feel comfortable with. You can't have bad S play it will absolutely gut a defense because they're last line of defense. They might feel more comfortable with Ty back there with Cooley since they both have way more experience.
Posted by BasedTiger
Member since Mar 2016
55 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:02 pm to
They'll probably do what they did against OM.
Different packages, flow of the game will dictate Thomas / Jimcoily / Jackson stepping in
Not necessarily in the STAR, it will be more of a variable until someone stands out
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 5:03 pm
Posted by Cd104
Member since Aug 2018
2433 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

I wonder if Charles Ross could learn the star position. He sure seems athletic enough.


Ross absolutely has the athleticism it seems they moved him back To ILB after his freshmen year tho. With the injury to spears tho all options should be on the table
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
11838 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:03 pm to
Didn’t they move woodland to star?
Posted by Antib551
Houma, LA
Member since Dec 2018
1464 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:04 pm to
No idea, but defense was significantly better when Baker dropped the STAR (Jimcoily) and went back to a more traditional nickel with Jhase at safety and Cooley down in nickel.
Posted by tigersaint2
Member since Feb 2009
24 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:11 pm to
Seems like Faheem Delane would fit the star role perfectly. Perhaps they give him a shot?
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
3158 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:26 pm to
Move Ty to Star and Thomas to safety. Thomas may be better at coverage anyways.
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
11086 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:28 pm to
We suck. We won’t be able to do diddly poo!!
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
11838 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:43 pm to
I couldn’t see them moving their best safety to star. Could be wrong, but the star position is just a glorified nickel.

I expect it will change based off opponent and their offensive strengths. Will probably see a lot of changes in game at that position.
Posted by Gonadballbarian
Member since Dec 2017
1874 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:56 pm to
Roman will be used now in the role that Green played a lot. At tight end. Per Kiffin
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27855 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

you want Thomas’s speed and range at safety and slide Cooley back to nickel?


I think this would have to be the plan outside of GL situations

The defense was a lot more athletic and versatile once they made this move and replaced Jimcolly
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
3158 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

I couldn’t see them moving their best safety to star. Could be wrong, but the star position is just a glorified nickel. I expect it will change based off opponent and their offensive strengths. Will probably see a lot of changes in game at that position.


Ty isn’t the most instinctual in coverage. Haulcy was much better as of now. Ty’s size makes him good around the box and he’s much more instinctual in the run game.
Posted by Veritas
Member since Feb 2005
11838 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

Ty’s size makes him good around the box and he’s much more instinctual in the run game.


Which is why I think they will make their decision based off opponent.
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
31330 posts
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:37 pm to
Kiffin was asked and said that’s a competitive advantage. Nobody is like spears length and coverage skills for that position. Truly a dynamic and unique player
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram