Started By
Message

re: Why Orgeron may succeed against Bama - And why Miles didn't

Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:33 pm to
Posted by TchPowDog
Zachary, LA
Member since Sep 2015
4798 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:33 pm to
Yall need to lay off Ree. The dude's a diehard and most of his posts have actual substance, backed with links and facts. There are WAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYY worse posters on this site.
Posted by la_birdman
Northern GA via Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31567 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:34 pm to
I know. Just pointing out that he did beat Bama then.


But head to head, he beat him at least 3 times.
Posted by deaux
Member since Oct 2018
20267 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

Clemson did a decent job in the trenches against Bama. But without the Spread/RPO, Bama would have kicked the shite out of Clemson.

Clemson’s DL destroyed Bama in that game
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
59711 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:34 pm to
“Where have I ever pulled against Will Wade?”

Lmfao the last several times you and I have conversed in the Rant were arguments because of you attacking and lying about Will Wade and me defending him. Pages long knock down drag out fights over you making false accusations and treating rumor and assumptions as fact in order to smear Wade.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

It's the same way we beat Georgia, dude.
The trenches are critical. But no one in college football is beating Bama by playing an old-school offense. LSU isn't. And neither is Clemson. They have to be spread out and tricked. Dude.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
59711 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:36 pm to
Don’t take it as criticism, I just know that the psychos who love to play gotcha will use a small error like that to attack you so take it as more of a reminder. No harm intended.
Posted by TchPowDog
Zachary, LA
Member since Sep 2015
4798 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

The trenches are critical. But no one in college football is beating Bama by playing an old-school offense. LSU isn't. And neither is Clemson. They have to be spread out and tricked. Dude.

Trenches are more important. Without trenches, you lose to Bama.
quote:

But no one in college football is beating Bama by playing an old-school offense

This is a given. You're not going to beat LSU that way either.
This post was edited on 4/22/19 at 5:40 pm
Posted by la_birdman
Northern GA via Lake Charles
Member since Feb 2005
31567 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:37 pm to
quote:

Don’t take it as criticism



I didn’t. All good.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
59711 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:39 pm to
The teams that beat Bama do it through the passing game. A lot of those teams do have the threat of a mobile QB but they don’t ever lose to teams because of the QB running the ball. Hell even Nick Marshall at Auburn, a converted corner, threw for over 400 yards when they beat Bama. You attack their man coverage that’s how everyone who’s beats them does it.
This post was edited on 4/22/19 at 5:40 pm
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Clemson’s DL destroyed Bama in that game
A big factor was that Clemson's DB's took away Tua's ultra-quick hitters by keeping eyes on the QB in zone AND man. Screwed Tua's timing up. Had to hold the ball longer. Gave the Clemson DL time to get to him.
Posted by TchPowDog
Zachary, LA
Member since Sep 2015
4798 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

A big factor was that Clemson's DB's took away Tua's ultra-quick hitters by keeping eyes on the QB in zone AND man. Screwed Tua's timing up. Had to hold the ball longer. Gave the Clemson DL time to get to him.

I think you need to rewatch that game. Bama's OL got their shite pushed in.
Posted by Folsom
Folsom
Member since Mar 2006
3455 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

How'd his last two home games against Bama go again?



Either you can't read or didn't read Buckeye's thread.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

A lot of those teams do have the threat of a mobile QB but they don’t ever lose to teams because of the QB running the ball
It's not the issue of having fleet evasive QB. It is having a QB who runs well enough that they have to devote a player to being in range to stop the QB if he tucks and runs. It skews the defense and weakens it significantly.

RPO 101
Posted by Tiger Ree
Houston
Member since Jun 2004
24563 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:46 pm to
quote:

Lmfao the last several times you and I have conversed in the Rant were arguments because of you attacking and lying about Will Wade and me defending him


Should be easy enough to find a single one of your posts and then post the one you were replying to, right? Just one?

quote:

Pages long knock down drag out fights over you making false accusations and treating rumor and assumptions as fact in order to smear Wade.


You are a fricking LIAR. I have stated many times I don't enough about the ongoing crap to even have an opinion on the matter.

Now I did post links to articles that had copies of transcripts that were read by lawyers in a federal court of law.

I also posted my favorite gif of the FBI guys shaking their head while supposedly listening to a wiretap.

It's funny you are big enough of an idiot to be "attacking and lying about" Tiger Ree while accusing me of doing it to an LSU coach.

Post one piece of evidence you low-life.
This post was edited on 4/22/19 at 5:50 pm
Posted by TigerNAtux
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
17900 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:47 pm to
This shite is getting ridiculous.
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14402 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

RPO 101


RPO’s don’t require a running QB. The QB has to make the read and hand off or throw. A mobile QB adds another element, but isn’t a necessity. No one fears Brees tucking and running.
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

I think you need to rewatch that game. Bama's OL got their shite pushed in.


Saw it just fine. Getting passes away is a game of tenths of seconds. That's why QB's who get the ball in the air in 2.5 seconds do far better than QB's who take 2.8.

Sure, the trenches matter. But if you don't comprehend that Clemson's Spread/RPO was a deciding factor then I can't waste my time with you.
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
14402 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:49 pm to
Damn, Ree. How’s like treating you these days?
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
59711 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:49 pm to
While I agree that having a mobile QB does put extra stress on the defense once it’s clear they’re not being used in the game plan that kind of dissipates. And having a mobile QB doesn’t have anything to do with “RPO 101” lol, mobile QBs were stressing defenders long before RPOs were a thing. Saban was losing games long before RPOs were a fashionable talking point around here. Bama is a man coverage team and if you execute with the matchups capable of hurting man coverage you can beat them.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34710 posts
Posted on 4/22/19 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Why Orgeron may succeed against Bama - And why Miles didn't


quote:

Buckeye Jeaux


Shocking
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram